| |
Roll CallCharles Bobbitt, Director John Gudvangen, Treasurer Tami Hasling, President Sandra Mann, Director Bob Null, Director
Tom Strand, Vice-PresidentJanet Tanner, Secretary
|
Item Action:
None |
| |
|
Motions
|
|
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present at Roll Call were President Tami Hasling, Vice-President Tom Strand, Secretary Janet Tanner, and Directors Sandra Mann and Bob Null. Treasurer John Gudvangen arrived during executive session and Director Charlie Bobbitt arrived during adoption of the agenda. Also present: Current Superintendent Dr. Terry Bishop, Incoming Superintendent Dr. Nicholas Gledich, Deputy Superintendent of Personnel Support Services Dr. Mary Thurman, Executive Director of Procurement and Contracting Mr. John Elliott, Deputy Superintendent of Educational Support Services Mr. Michael Poore, Human Resources Division Head Mr. David Schenkel, Communications Director Ms. Elaine Naleski, and Secretary to the Board of Education Julie Rene Stevens.
|
|
|
|
| A.3 - |
Moment of Silence - |
| A.4 - |
Adoption of the Agenda - |
| |
The agenda presented to the Board in the Board’s packet will be considered for approval at this time. A Board Director or the Superintendent may request to, add, delete or table an item, i.e., an emergency school closure approval action that is in accordance with Policies. Board Directors shall make a separate motion for each item they seek to have added, deleted, or tabled. Reordering items on the agenda requires approval of a single motion with a majority vote of the quorum present.
A Board Director’s request that a non-emergency item be added to the agenda, as action shall require for approval a two-thirds majority of the entire Board. The Director making the request shall provide a copy of the motion and materials to all Board Directors. A Board Director’s request that a non-emergency item be added to the agenda, as non-action shall require for approval a majority of the quorum present. The Director making the request shall provide a copy of the motion and materials to all Board Directors.
|
Item Action:
Approved |
| |
Recommendation That the Board of Education adopts the agenda, as presented (and/or amended). |
|
| |
|
Motions
|
|
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
|
| Approve |
|
Tom Strand |
Bob Null |
Passed |
|
Director Strand moved to adopt the agenda with the following modifications: remove action items C2- Contract Awards and C3-Budget Transfers, Appropriations and FTE Approvals, as there were no Contract Awards and C3-Budget Transfers, Appropriations or FTE Approvals; add revised pages 1-6 and an addendum to C5-Personnel Recommendations; remove non-action items D2-Consideration of the District's Hearing Impaired Program, from tonight's agenda to non-action on the May 6, 2009, agenda. Director Null seconded the motion, which passed, 6/0. Director Gudvangen was absent.
|
|
|
|
| A.5 - |
Executive Session - |
| |
The Board of Education may, under state statutes, go into Executive Session to discuss matters pertaining to:
1) property transactions [per C.R.S. 24-6-402(4)(a)] [particular matter:];
2) X legal advice [per C.R.S. 24-6-402(4)(b)] [particular matter: Negotiations, Current Superintendent's Contract];
3) security arrangements or investigations [per C.R.S. 24-6-402(4)(d)] [particular matter:];
4) X negotiations [per C.R.S. 24-6-402(4)(e)] [particular matter: Negotiations/Meet & Confer];
5) X personnel [per C.R.S. 24-6-402(4)(f)] [particular matter: Personnel, Current Superintendent's Contract];
6) individual student(s) [per C.R.S. 24-6-402(4)(h)] [particular matter: ]; 7) documents that may not be disclosed under the Colorado Open Records Act [per C.R.S. 24-6-402(4)(g)] [particular matter ]; and 8) matters required to be kept confidential by state or federal law [per C.R.S. 24-6-402(4)(c)][specific legal citation:]. Executive Session from approximately 5:30 p.m.-6:30 p.m. The Board of Education will reconvene into regular session at approximately 6:30 p.m.
|
Item Action:
Approved |
| |
Recommendation To convene into Executive Session. The Board of Education may, under state statutes, go into Executive Session to discuss matters pertaining to property transactions, legal advice, security arrangements or investigations, negotiations, personnel, individual students, documents that may not be disclosed under the Colorado Open Records Act and matters required to be kept confidential by law. |
|
| |
|
Motions
|
|
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
|
| Approve |
|
Tom Strand |
Bob Null |
Passed |
Director Strand moved to convene into Executive Session. Director Null seconded the motion, which passed, 6/0. Director Gudvangen was absent.
The Board of Education convened into Executive Session to discuss: legal advice [per C.R.S. 24-6-402(4)(b)] [particular matter: Negotiations, Current Superintendent's Contract]; negotiations [per C.R.S. 24-6-402(4)(e)] [particular matter: Negotiations/Meet & Confer]; and personnel [per C.R.S. 24-6-402(4)(f)] [particular matter: Personnel, Current Superintendent's Contract].
|
|
|
|
| A.6 - |
Pledge of Allegiance - |
| A.8 - |
Modification of the Agenda - |
| |
A Board Director, by a motion, or the Superintendent (via a recommendation for a motion), may cause the modification of the previously approved agenda only for the following reason: Required action following discussion in Executive Session.
|
Item Action:
Approved |
| |
Recommendation That the Board of Education adopts the agenda modifications. |
|
| |
|
Motions
|
|
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
|
| Approve |
Add an action item to the agenda |
Tom Strand |
Bob Null |
Passed |
|
Based on discussion in tonight's executive session, Director Strand moved that the Board of Education approve payment of $35,000 to the superintendent, on or about May 1, 2009, to apply against and reduce payments to be made to the superintendent with respect to sick and vacation leave payouts, which would occur at the termination of the superintendent's employment contract. President Hasling clarified that the motion was to add an action item to the agenda. Director Strand replied yes, and that it would be action item C2-Current Superintendent's Contract. Director Null seconded the motion, which passed, 7/0.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
President Hasling then introduced the future superintendent of District 11, Dr. Nicholas Gledich.
|
|
|
|
| |
The Board as a representative body of the District wishes to provide an avenue for any citizen to express his/her interest and concerns for the schools. Accordingly, the public is cordially invited to attend Board meetings. Meetings of the Board are conducted for the purposes of carrying on the business of the Board and are closed to the public only during executive sessions. There are three 20-minute time periods designated for Citizens’ Comments:
1.) During the Preliminaries section of the agenda, as the last item before the start of the Consent Items for the purpose of addressing other concerns that are not Action or Non-Action items on the agenda, 2.) At the beginning of Action for the purpose of addressing action items only, and 3.) At the beginning of Non-Action for the purpose of addressing Non-Action items only. Except when otherwise specified by the Board President, comments by individual citizens in a given time period shall be limited to three minutes with a 30-second warning on the time limit. In order that the Board may fairly and adequately discharge its overall responsibilities, citizens who wish to make requests, representations or proposals to the Board are requested to direct these to the Superintendent, who will deal with them according to the regulations approved by the Board. Ref: Policy BEDH/BEDH-R.
|
Item Action:
None |
| |
|
Motions
|
|
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
|
|
Elaine Naleski and LouAnn Dekleva |
|
|
|
Communications Director Elaine Naleski and Supervisor of Volunteer Services LouAnn Dekleva, topic: Board Member Recognition. Ms. Naleski announced that this was National Volunteer Week, and that the school board positions are not paid positions, but volunteer positions, saying that "Our board members give countless hours to the district and we really appreciate what they do."
Ms. Dekleva commented that they had cards and gifts for board members. The quote on the card said, "Leaders learn by leading, and they learn best by leading in the face of obstacles. As weather shapes mountains, problems shape leaders." Ms. Dekleva thanked board members for their hard work this year.
Ms. Naleski and Ms. Dekleva passed out cards and gifts to each board member.
|
|
|
|
Katrina Krause |
|
|
|
|
Katrina Krause, student body president, Doherty High School, topic: Dennis Vigil. Ms. Krause read her comments supporting Mr. Vigil as principal of Doherty High School.
|
|
|
|
Lexie Jones |
|
|
|
|
Lexie Jones, senior at Doherty High School, topic: Dennis Vigil. Ms. Jones commented in support of Dennis Vigil. She asked board members to explain the process and made several other points.
|
|
|
|
Kristyn Brisnehan |
|
|
|
|
Kristyn Brisnehan, senior, Doherty High School, topic: Dennis Vigil. Ms. Brisnehan also commented in support of Dennis Vigil. Ms. Brisnehan submitted her comments electronically, and they are attached to the minutes.
|
|
|
|
Sandy Clements-Albertson |
|
|
|
|
Sandy Clements-Albertson, topic: School Closure-Adams Elementary School. Ms. Clements-Albertson commented that she would take further action against Dr. Cutter, Linda Hunt-Stone and District 11. She said she had documentation to support her.
|
|
|
|
Robin Bonner |
|
|
|
|
Robin Bonner, Doherty parent, topic: Dennis Vigil. Mrs. Bonner spoke in support of Dennis Vigil.
|
|
|
|
Melinda Lawson |
|
|
|
|
Melinda Lawson, topic: School Closures/Boundaries. Ms. Lawson claimed that closing Adams elementary school and shuffling their children to crowded schools and re-drawing boundary lines would have the effect of killing her community. She commented on a public version of a financial pet peeves document, promising that she would make public, in great detail, each and every cost saving alternative to closing neighborhood schools.
|
|
|
|
Lori Thom |
|
|
|
|
Lori Thom, educational support professional (ESP) at Doherty High School, topic: ESP support for Doherty's Principal, Dennis Vigil. Ms. Thom gave some brief history on the Educational Support Professionals employee group and said it was important to educational support professionals that they have the respect of their principal, and they have that at Doherty. She continued speaking in support of Dennis Vigil. Ms. Thom also presented a petition of ESP support for Dennis Vigil to the board.
|
|
|
|
Ashley Bonner |
|
|
|
|
Ashley Bonner, student body vice-president, Doherty High School, topic: Dennis Vigil. Ms. Bonner spoke in support of Dennis Vigil.
|
|
|
|
Amberly Brown |
|
|
|
|
Amberly Brown, BAAC president at Doherty High School, topic: Dennis Vigil. As BAAC president, Ms. Brown was involved in the interview process for the Doherty High School Principal position; she asked for an explanation of the process, or policy used in posting and hiring for a principal position.
|
|
|
|
| B.1 - | Adoption of Consent Items - 2 minutes | Item Action: Approved | | | Consent items are placed in the consent portion of the agenda. If board members have any questions concerning these items, they should be directed to the Superintendent or designee prior to the board meeting. If discussion is required on any one of the items, it may be removed from the consent agenda. Those items indicated as being consent items will be adopted by one single motion unless a member of the board requests an item be removed from the consent agenda. Ref. Page: | | | | Recommendation To adopt all consent items as designated in the agenda. Consent items: - B.2. Minutes of Board Meetings
| | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
| | Approve | consent | Jan Tanner | Tom Strand | Passed | Director Tanner moved to adopt all consent items as designated in the agenda. Consent items:
- B.2. Minutes of Board Meetings
Director Strand seconded the motion, which passed, 7/0. | |
|
| B.2 - | Approval of Board Meeting Minutes | Item Action: None | | | Ref. Pages: Under Separate Cover | | | | Recommendation That the Board of Education approves the minutes of the April 8, 2009, regular board meeting. All minutes are available on the district website after approval by the Board of Education.
| | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
| | | | | | | The Board of Education approved the minutes of the April 8, 2009, regular board meeting. All minutes are available on the district website after approval by the Board of Education.
| |
|
| C.1 - | Citizens' Comments | Item Action: None | | | The Board as a representative body of the District wishes to provide an avenue for any citizen to express his/her interest and concerns for the schools. Accordingly, the public is cordially invited to attend Board meetings. Meetings of the Board are conducted for the purposes of carrying on the business of the Board and are closed to the public only during executive sessions. There are three 20-minute time periods designated for Citizens’ Comments:
1.) During the Preliminaries section of the agenda, as the last item before the start of the Consent Items for the purpose of addressing other concerns that are not Action or Non-Action items on the agenda, 2.) At the beginning of Action for the purpose of addressing action items only, and 3.) At the beginning of Non-Action for the purpose of addressing Non-Action items only. Except when otherwise specified by the Board President, comments by individual citizens in a given time period shall be limited to three minutes with a 30-second warning on the time limit. In order that the Board may fairly and adequately discharge its overall responsibilities, citizens who wish to make requests, representations or proposals to the Board are requested to direct these to the Superintendent, who will deal with them according to the regulations approved by the Board. Ref: Policy BEDH/BEDH-R. | | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
| | Lori Morrow | | | | Lori Morrow, topic: School Utilization: Irving. Ms. Morrow spoke regarding the closure of Irving Middle School. | | | Esther Mueller | | | | | Esther Mueller, topic: School Utilization-Galileo and North Middle Schools. Ms. Mueller spoke regarding the proposed boundary changes for middle schools. She asked the board to amend the motion tonight and not vote on the middle school boundaries until a better balance could be achieved.
| | | Brian Kachel | | | | | Brian Kachel, teacher at Grant Elementary School, topic: Proposed Boundary Change. He commented on Grant's capacity and said that they are already "squeezed" in their school. He spoke regarding his PE class and the issue they face next year. Mr. Kachel said one solution proposed to address the lack of space at Grant was to soundproof the gym and use it for tutoring and Special Education; he gave reasons on why that wouldn't work. He commented that the wall would cost $25,000.
| | | SueAnn Gurwell | | | | | SueAnn Gurwell, teacher at Jefferson for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing program, topic: School Utilization-Jefferson Elementary. Ms. Gurwell provided some history on the D/HH program. She then commented that she felt her students were not wanted at Stratton, and gave examples why. Ms. Gurwell said she felt Stratton could be the best fit for these kids and the program. She listed pros about being close to Mann Middle School and that they would finally be in the Palmer Cluster.
| | | Robyn Carr | | | | | Robyn Carr, parent of a deaf and hard of hearing child at Jefferson, topic: School Utilization-Jefferson. Ms. Carr said that she was the parent of a profoundly deaf child and said that one reason her family moved to Colorado Springs and District 11 was because of the Deaf and Hard of Hearing program at Jefferson. She spoke regarding the proposed relocation of the program to Stratton. She was recently informed that there was some resistance to the kids and program moving to Stratton, saying, "It's sad to know that there is still such ignorance within the educational community." Ms. Carr commented that it was devastating that a small cluster of teachers were making this transition disastrous. She continued speaking on why she chose District 11 instead of the Colorado Springs Deaf and Blind school and other positives of relocating the program to Stratton Elementary School.
| | | Dave Cook | | | | | Dave Cook, president of CSPA, topic: School Utilization/Proposed Boundary Recommendations. Mr. Cook said he was here tonight representing the Colorado Springs Principals Association and commented on boundary decisions and the fact that the district is proposing moving around a great deal of teachers and students in the district. He said the numbers and projections need to be correct and asked where did those numbers come from? Mr. Cook said the principals would like the opportunity to sit down with departments to review the numbers and projections to make sure they were dealing with accurate numbers.
| |
|
| C.2 - | Contract Awards | Item Action: Approved | | | The purpose of this agenda item is to have a standing agenda item in place on a continual weekly basis. This agenda item will be used for capital investment and other contracts. Timing of contract actions is such that it will require continual expeditious board approval of contracts. Some weeks will not have any contracts, while many other weeks will have lists of proposed contracts for board approval. Each week a reference will be submitted listing any proposed contract actions with appropriate information. Solicitation documents and information about each procurement action are available for examination and review in the Business Office.
| | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
| | Approve | Superintendent's employment contract payment | Tom Strand | Charles Bobbitt | Passed | | Director Strand moved that the Board of Education approves the payment of $35,000 to the Superintendent on or about May 1, 2009, to apply against and reduce any payments to be made to the Superintendent with respect to sick leave and vacation leave payouts at termination under the Superintendent's employment contract. Director Bobbitt seconded the motion, which passed, 7/0.
| |
|
| C.3 - | Budget Transfers, Appropriations and FTE Approvals | Item Action: None | | | Board Policy DBJ-Budget Transfers requires the board to approve budget transfers for any fund when: (1) the aggregate amount to be transferred to support any line item, single issue or purpose exceeds $100,000; or (2) the accumulation of budget transfer needs is expected to significantly impact the annual budget; or (3) transfers from one major function category to another major function category exceed $20,000 or (4) strategic plan resource allocations need to be re prioritized. Board approval is also required for general fund contingency transfers over $50,000, or in the event the contingency reserve will be reduced by more than 25% for the fiscal year. Board policy DBJ also states that all capital reserve fund project budget appropriations shall be approved by the board; therefore, any transfer of unspent, or unencumbered monies to other projects, shall be approved by the board. CRS-32-109 (1) (f) (l) states the Board of Education has the specific duty to employ all personnel...and to fix and order paid their compensations. Since the budgetary impact of adding a new position must first be considered prior to the hiring process, Board approval is required when there is a proposed change to the authorized staffing level. | | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
| | There were no budget transfers, appropriations or FTE approvals | | | | | |
|
| C.4 - | Designation of Official Posting Location for Board of Education Meetings & Notices - 10 minutes | Item Action: Approved | | | Colorado law and the Board of Education bylaws require that the Board designate a public place or places for posting notices of Board meetings each year at the Board’s first regular meeting during the calendar year.
The Board of Education Office will be re-located to the Galileo School during the renovation of the main administration building; therefore, board meeting notices, agendas and other official notices will need to be posted at this temporary location.
| | | | Recommendation That the Board of Education designates an area outside the boardroom at 1115 N. El Paso Street, Colorado Springs, Colorado 80903, as the official location for posting notices of the remaining Board meetings for 2008-09, effective April 22, 2009, as submitted by the Administration.
| | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
| | Approve | | Charles Bobbitt | Tom Strand | Passed | Dr. Bishop commented that State law requires that there be an official location for the posting of Board of Education meetings and notices, and since administration had relocated back into the administration building at 1115 N. El Paso from the Galileo School (where board meetings and notices have been posted for the past six months) this item was added to the agenda.
Director Bobbitt moved that the Board of Education designates an area outside the boardroom at 1115 N. El Paso Street, Colorado Springs, Colorado 80903, as the official location for posting notices of the remaining Board meetings for 2008-09, effective April 22, 2009, as submitted by the Administration. Director Strand seconded the motion, which passed, 7/0.
| |
|
| C.5 - | Personnel Recommendations - 2 minutes | Item Action: Approved | | | The Division of Human Resources provides for consideration a list of Personnel Recommendations. The Board may remove an individual personnel recommendation for separate consideration by amending the original motion to approve the recommendation list. Presenters: Dr. Thurman/Mr. Schenkel
Ref. Pages: 20-31 | | | | Recommendation That the Board of Education approves the April 22, 2009, Personnel Recommendations, as submitted by the Administration.
| | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
| | Approve | | Jan Tanner | Charles Bobbitt | Passed | Dr. Bishop introduced the topic.
Director Tanner moved that the Board of Education approves the April 22, 2009, Personnel Recommendations, as amended and added to (adding revised pages 1-6 and an addendum) by the Administration. Director Bobbitt seconded the motion, which passed, 7/0.
| |
|
| C.6 - | Proposed Boundary Recommendations - 60 minutes | Item Action: Approved | | | These are the recommended boundary changes needed to implement the Utilization Plan changes for school year 2009-10. As such they are only for the elementary and middle school levels and do not include changes for any K-8 implementation or high schools. Presenters: Dr. Thurman/Mr. Poore/Mr. Gustafson/Mr. Bernhard/Mr. BairRef. Pages: 32-44 | | | | Recommendation - That the Board of Education approves the proposed boundary changes for various elementary and middle schools as presented.
- That the Board of Education approves the proposed transported area changes for various elementary and middle schools as presented.
| | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
| | Approve | Proposed boundary recommendations | Jan Tanner | Tom Strand | Passed | Dr. Bishop and Dr. Thurman introduced the topic and turned over the presentation to John Kerr.
Consultant John Kerr reviewed the revised recommendations.
Director Tanner moved that 1. the Board of Education approves the proposed boundary changes for various elementary and middle schools as presented, and 2. that the Board of Education approves the proposed transported area changes for various elementary and middle schools as presented. Director Strand seconded the motion.
President Hasling called for a recess so the board could discuss what was really included in the motion. The main motion, as amended, passed 7/0.
The Board of Education approved 1. the proposed boundary changes for various elementary and middle schools as presented, and 2. approves the proposed transported area changes for various elementary and middle schools, and removed the Trailblazer and Chipeta boundaries from the motion and directed administration to re-examine the proposed boundary issues concerning Chipeta and Trailblazer, with the goal to better balance the two schools.
| | | Approve | Amendment #1 | Tom Strand | Charles Bobbitt | Passed | Director Strand moved to amend the motion by directing the administration to re-examine the proposed boundary issues concerning both Chipeta and Trailblazer elementary schools, with the goal to better balance the two schools. Director Bobbitt seconded the motion. Director Strand spoke to his amendment and explained his concerns.
Discussion and comments followed on a K-8 possibility at Trailblazer in the future and the timing to those proposed boundary changes and impact on neighborhoods and families.
President Hasling clarified Director Strand's amendment, and confirmed that he wanted to remove the Trailblazer and Chipeta boundaries from consideration tonight; Director Strand agreed and said that he also wanted to direct the administration to re-examine the imbalance between the two schools. Director Gudvangen asked Director Strand to re-state his motion, because that it not what it said to begin with. Director Strand withdrew his previous amendment and restated his amendment to then state: withdraw the Trailblazer and Chipeta boundaries from consideration tonight; and that the Board of Education directs the administration to re-examine the proposed boundary issues concerning Chipeta and Trailblazer elementary schools, with the goal of better equalizing the number of students attending both schools. Director Bobbitt, as the second, agreed.
Director Gudvangen asked if the proposed Howbert/Jackson boundary changes were now off the table, saying that in this proposal, some of the Howbert/Jackson area goes to Chipeta and he didn't want to tie the hands of those making the consideration. He commented, "I guess what I'm doing is speaking against this particular motion. We still have opportunities to make this change next year when we know where we're headed; disrupting fewer numbers of students in multiple year settings."
Discussion continued. Director Strand commented that he didn't want to delay all the boundary changes, just this area.
Dr. Kerr confirmed that he heard was that the board would like to look at balancing the two schools, Chipeta and Trailblazer now and deal with the K-8 (when and if it happens) later. He reviewed the proposed northern boundary changes, saying that the district would be looking for about 125-150 students in the northern part of the Chipeta boundary to move to Trailblazer, leaving Trailblazer a little smaller, so they could absorb a K-8 change.
Discussion continued, with board members weighing in. Director Tanner said the she was in favor of alleviate the population issue at Chipeta and adding a small amount to Trailblazer; however, she was not in favor of equalizing this area if kids were going to be moved again next year.
Dr. Kerr said they could bring back some scenarios/options. Director Tanner said she wanted to know that if the district moved a small number of students, would Trailblazer still accommodate those students in a K8. Dr. Kerr understood and confirmed that they would work that into the options brought back to the board.
The amendment passed, 6/1. Director Gudvangen voted no.
| | | Approve | Amendment #2 | Charles Bobbitt | | | Director Bobbitt asked about an area in the north proposed Rogers area permitting into Queen Palmer. His point was that it was an easy walk to Queen Palmer from that area, yet the district has proposed busing those students to Rogers. There were thirteen students in that area per Dr. Thurman.
Director Bobbitt moved to amend the main motion by leaving the Queen Palmer boundary as it currently is and not busing those students to Rogers. There was no second; therefore, the motion died.
Director Bobbitt asked about the Grant/Penrose boundaries, specifically the VanTeylingen area. Mr. Bernhard replied to his concerns, saying that the VanTeylingen area has sixty-three students within it. Adding these students to Grant would put Grant at one student over capacity (would be at 100% capacity). Mr. Bernhard explained in further detail. Dr. Thurman advised that the proposed boundary recommendation would put Penrose at 105% occupancy. Director Bobbitt commented that jamming students into a school takes away from their education.
| | | Approve | Amendment #3 | Sandra Mann | Charles Bobbitt | | Director Null moved, with regard to the overall transportation impact and utilizing the transportation metrics and rules, authorize the transportation advisory committee to make exceptions to the rules when justified for reasons such as safety and security. Decisions can be appealed to the Board of Education. Director Bobbitt seconded the motion. Director Null spoke to his motion and said that he didn't see anything wrong with giving the Transportation Advisory Committee (TAC) the authority to waive and approve transportation for safety and security reasons. President Hasling commented that it was her understanding that TAC already has that authority. Mr. Bernhard replied that there were two mechanisms built into the Transportation Service Index (TSI) to handle these types of decisions, and that a person can challenge or appeal a decision. A challenge/appeal to the TSI can come from anyone; any avenue. After Mr. Bernhard's response, Director Null withdrew his motion.
Director Bobbitt restated his concern about Adams students walking to Hunt. Discussion followed. Mr. Bernhard confirmed that the board approves the rubric and transported areas. Mr. Bernhard offered to have District 11 Security Director José Gurulé speak on the issues raised by the Adams principal; however, that did not happen. Dr. Thurman informed the board that after the initial concern was voiced the committee did go back and discuss it. They also asked Mr. Gurulé to check into her concerns. Mr. Gurulé did as requested and delivered a report on his findings to the committee.
| | | Approve | Amendment #4 | Bob Null | Charles Bobbitt | Failed | Director Null asked Freedom Elementary School principal said they could handle the change without portables. Dr. Thurman replied, yes.
Director Null moved that the Board of Education task administration to study/assess and report back to the board in the near future, on the use of portables and when existing portables could be replaced with permanent facilities. Director Bobbitt seconded the motion. Discussion continued. Director Bobbitt commented that it was a security issue, and was not a good learning environment. Director Null wanted to phase them out, and wanted administration to prepare a sunset statement on the use of portables in the district, and propose an end use date for each one being used now, to be replaced by permanent facilities.
Discussion followed.
Director Null offered to amend his amendment to justify keeping them (portables) forever. He did not have a problem if schools used portables for storage; his issue was with teaching kids in portables.
The motion failed, 2/5. Directors Gudvangen, Hasling, Mann, Strand and Tanner voted no.
| | | Approve | Grandfathering of Students and Transportation | Charles Bobbitt | | | Director Bobbitt moved to remove Part III-Grandfathering, Capping and Permits from the main motion. President Hasling advised that this wasn't part of the main motion being considered. Director Bobbitt withdrew his motion. However, Dr. Kerr was asked to clarify.
Dr. Kerr said that the Grandfathering part was a recommendation from the committee that would need to be approved separately from the boundary considerations. The committee gave the board some suggestions regarding the capping and permits, but changes would have to be made by the board's policy sub-committee.
Discussion continued on the grandfathering, capping and permits issues. President Hasling clarified that the grandfathering was part of the main motion and that there would not be a separate motion or vote on it. Dr. Thurman agreed. President Hasling read that motion, "Move that the Board of Education approve the proposed boundary changes of various elementary and middle schools and that the Board of Education approve the proposed transported area changes for various elementary and middle schools as presented." Discussion continued.
Director Gudvangen commented that he believed the motion on the floor was from a document titled, Transportation Change Recommendations, which said, "A. The Boundary Advisory Committee recommended that students currently enrolled going into fifth, seventh or eighth grade be Grandfathered at current schools where applicable and B. it is also recommended that these students be eligible for transportation back to their Grandfathered school if there are 30 or more students from the neighborhood eligible for Grandfathering." He reiterated that it said nothing about capping.
President Hasling suggested that the board take a short recess and then come back and discuss exactly where they were at in the process, which they did.
When the board returned from recess, President Hasling confirmed that the motion encompassed everything as presented and was what the board received today in an e-mail. President Hasling called for the vote on the main motion, which included the Transportation Change Recommendations, as clarified by Director Gudvangen previously.
The Board of Education approved 1. the proposed boundary changes for various elementary and middle schools as presented, and 2. approves the proposed transported area changes for various elementary and middle schools, and removed the Trailblazer and Chipeta boundaries from the motion and directed administration to re-examine the proposed boundary issues concerning Chipeta and Trailblazer, with the goal to better balance the two schools.
| |
|
| C.7 - | FY09-10 Preliminary Budget Development Assumptions - 30 minutes | Item Action: Approved | | | Each year prior to preparing the proposed budget document the Budget Office provides preliminary budget information to the Board of Education for approval.
Presenter: Ms. Kluck
Ref. Pages: 45-47 | | | | Recommendation That the Board of Education approves the revised preliminary budget development assumptions as presented on April 22, 2009, by the administration.
| | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
| | Approve | PBDA | Tom Strand | Jan Tanner | Passed | Executive Director of Budget and Planning Rebecca Kluck presented the preliminary budget development assumptions and reviewed them in detail with the board.
Director Strand moved that the Board of Education approves the revised preliminary budget development assumptions, as presented on April 22, 2009, by the administration. Director Tanner seconded the motion. Discussion, questions and answers followed.
Director Strand revised his motion to say: that the Board of Education reviewed and considered the revised preliminary budget development assumptions, as presented on April 22, 2009, by the administration. Director Null seconded. Discussion continued on if the board had to approve the preliminary budget development assumptions by a specific date.
Ms. Kluck advised that there is not a specific date to approve the preliminary budget development assumptions (PDBA). Human Resources Division Head Mr. Schenkel spoke about the parameters. He said the parameter would always be fluid and that one of the key reasons they used to push for the PBDA was class size issues and to get staffing started. However, class size hasn't been an issue since the mill levy was passed. He said he didn't need an approval by the board because the parameter would be what it would be and if they had to renegotiate, they would renegotiate. Director Strand withdrew his motion.
Director Strand then moved that the Board of Education approved and considered the revised preliminary budget development assumptions, as presented on April 22, 2009, by the administration. Director Null seconded the motion.
Director Gudvangen moved to amend the motion by adding the words, "and directs the administration to consider adjustments to all budget items in order to meet the district's mission and goals," to the end of Director Strand's motion. Director Null seconded.
President Hasling requested that the motion be read in its entirety by the two directors.
Director Strand said that he moved that the Board of Education has reviewed and considered the revised preliminary budget development assumptions (then Director Gudvangen inserted his amendment) and directs the administration to consider adjustments to all budget items in order to meet the district's mission and goals. Director Null restated his second.
Discussion continued.
The motion, that the Board of Education has reviewed and considered the revised preliminary budget development assumptions, and directs the administration to consider adjustments to all budget items in order to meet the district's mission and goals, passed, 7/0.
| |
|
| C.8 - | Instructional Materials & Secondary Courses Approval - 20 minutes | Item Action: Approved | | | Instructional MaterialsExecutive Summary
The Board of Education has the responsibility to adopt textbook materials, periodicals, newspapers, computer software, and content posters. The adoption of new instructional materials originates at the site based on identified curricular needs. The process is progressive in that it originates with an individual staff member. The department chairperson or elementary principal reviews the proposed media. The appropriate curriculum committee reviews the instructional materials and asks a citizen to review and make a written recommendation. The curriculum committee recommends the instructional materials for general or specific use and then submits the instructional materials for recommendation to the appropriate content area facilitator. Once the appropriate facilitator approves the instructional materials, a request for adoption is made to the Deputy Superintendent.
All instructional materials submitted for adoption have completed the required process as specified in the Board of Education policy IJJ-R. The Textbook Selection and Adoption policy states “The Board will receive requests to adopt titles recommended by the curriculum committees along with the citizens’ comments and the curriculum committee’s analysis of the citizens’ comments.” Secondary CoursesExecutive Summary
The Board of Education is required by state statutes to determine the educational programs delivered to the schools of the district. The development of new courses is driven by educational needs at school sites. The process is progressive in that it originates at the school with identified student needs. A proposed course is then reviewed by the building principal. The proposal moves to the appropriate curriculum committee where it is approved or not approved based on the following:
1. Relationships to content standards and benchmarks
2. Assessment procedures
3. Instructional strategies and objectives
4. Materials and resources
Once approved by the curriculum committee, the appropriate Curriculum Facilitator signs the course approval and submits it to the Deputy Superintendent of Educational Support Services for approval.
All course proposals submitted for approval or deletion have completed the required process of the Division of Educational Support Services. Board of Education Policy IGA (Curriculum Development) states that “Curriculum development shall be the responsibility of the professional staff… under the direction of the Deputy Superintendent…After planning by the faculty and approval by the administration, new courses shall be presented to the Board for its approval/disapproval.” Policy IGD (Curriculum Adoption) states that “all new programs and courses of study, as well as the elimination or extension of the content of current programs, shall be presented by the superintendent/designee to the Board for its consideration and action.” Presenters: Mr. Poore/Mr. MaloneRef. Pages: 48-49 | | | | Recommendation Instructional Materials
The instructional materials on the enclosed list of materials have been selected and recommended for adoption according to Board of Education Policy IJJ-R. These materials include textbooks, periodicals, newspapers, computer software, and content posters.
Secondary Courses
The Division of Educational Support Services presents new, changed and/or deleted courses, as attached, which have been developed according to Board of Education Policy IG and IGD. These courses are designed to support the needs of secondary students and are related to content standards and benchmarks.
| | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
| | Approve | | Tom Strand | Charles Bobbitt | Passed | Deputy Superintendent Mike Poore introduced the topic. He and Director of Curriculum David Malone gave a brief review of the Instructional Materials and Secondary Courses.
Director Strand moved that the Board of Education approves the new Instructional Materials and Secondary Courses, as submitted by the administration. Director Bobbitt seconded the motion. Discussion followed.
The Board of Education approved the new Instructional Materials and Secondary Courses, as submitted by the administration, 7/0.
| |
|
| D.1 - | Citizens' Comments | Item Action: None | | | The Board as a representative body of the District wishes to provide an avenue for any citizen to express his/her interest and concerns for the schools. Accordingly, the public is cordially invited to attend Board meetings. Meetings of the Board are conducted for the purposes of carrying on the business of the Board and are closed to the public only during executive sessions. There are three 20-minute time periods designated for Citizens’ Comments:
1.) During the Preliminaries section of the agenda, as the last item before the start of the Consent Items for the purpose of addressing other concerns that are not Action or Non-Action items on the agenda, 2.) At the beginning of Action for the purpose of addressing action items only, and 3.) At the beginning of Non-Action for the purpose of addressing Non-Action items only. Except when otherwise specified by the Board President, comments by individual citizens in a given time period shall be limited to three minutes with a 30-second warning on the time limit. In order that the Board may fairly and adequately discharge its overall responsibilities, citizens who wish to make requests, representations or proposals to the Board are requested to direct these to the Superintendent, who will deal with them according to the regulations approved by the Board. Ref: Policy BEDH/BEDH-R. | | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
| | Cindy Church | | | | President Hasling allowed Ms. Church to speak, as Ms. Church was not aware that the non-action item was pulled from the agenda.
Cindy Church, administrative assistant at Stratton Elementary School, topic: School Utilization-Stratton. Ms. Church commented that she has been the administrative assistant (secretary) at Stratton Elementary School for the past eight years, during which time she experienced a lot of change. Ms. Church said the people within the walls of Stratton are warm and welcoming and passionate. She said, "This is who we are. We are a school of compassion. A lot of decisions are being made that affect us all and I would like to say to you, and if I may, to our friends at Jefferson Elementary, that the issues surrounding the movement of the Deaf and Hard of Hearing Program is not about Stratton not wanting the students and the parents and the staff of Jefferson to join our family. Our efforts are solely perpetuated by the physical lack of space. There is absolutely no other motive driving our efforts. It has never been our intent to convey anything otherwise." She implored the board to evaluate the situation with the facts that had been presented over the past several months.
| |
|
| D.2 - | Consideration of the District's Hearing Impaired Program - 20 minutes | Item Action: None | | | During the February 25, 2009, regular meeting the Board of Education approved closing Jefferson Elementary and moving the Hearing Impaired program from Jefferson to the Stratton site effective August 1, 2009.
Additionally, at the April 8, 2009, regular meeting, the Board of Education approved the appropriation and transfer of $1,140,000 from the general fund contingency reserve with the additional requirement that the contingency reserve be replenished by $1,140,000 from the reutilization savings as soon as practicable. The detail was amended by removing the $10,000 for the Stratton hearing impaired improvement.
Administration will present a recommendation regarding the location of the District's Hearing Impaired Program.
| | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
| | This item was postponed under Adoption of the Agenda to the May 6, 2009, regular board meeting | | | | | |
|
| E. | REPORTS AND DISCUSSION ITEMS |
| E.1 - | Superintendent/Administrative Reports | Item Action: None | | | This agenda item is reserved for presentations, status reports, and announcements to the Board by the Superintendent and the Administration that have not been provided as information only in the Board packets. Unless otherwise directed by the Board, annual and standing reports not requiring Board action are to be provided in hard copy for information only in the Board Director packets. The superintendent has the opportunity to report on a range of topics during this time.
| | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
|
|
| E.2 - | Other Discussion Items | Item Action: None | | | Board members will have the opportunity for open discussion. | | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
| | | | | | Director Null commented that he believed that there was a health issue at Stratton, specifically the Quonset hut. He proposed that it be inspected by the Health Department. He also said the bathroom in the Quonset hut was not handicapped equipped.
Director Strand commented that when he attended the DAAC meeting last week, an individual asked that the board determine what they want from DAAC and tell them.
Director Gudvangen commented that he had the sense that DAAC felt like they were being ignored; perhaps they need some revitalization. The board should consider making them more mission critical. He said that the board did a lot of important work this year and perhaps didn't use them (DAAC). Director Gudvangen suggested that the board give DAAC a good charge and use them. They have the potential to tap each school. The board agreed to schedule a time to meet with them given.
Director Tanner commented that Director Strand's account was overdrawn. She requested head nods to transfer funds from other board member accounts to cover his expenditures. Approval head nods were given. Board members will be brought up to date with their accounts.
President Hasling informed the board that the April 29 work session would be held in the boardroom at 5:30 p.m.
| |
|
| E.3 - | Board Subcommittee Reports | Item Action: None | | | Board members will have the opportunity to report on their respective subcommittees. | | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
|
|
| F.1 - | New Agenda Items from Board Discussion | Item Action: None | | | Board members have the opportunity to bring forward items for a future agenda. | | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
|
|
| F.2 - | Magnet School Concepts - TBD | Item Action: None | | | Magnet School Concepts will be presented sometime after the November elections. | | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
|
|
| G. | FUTURE WORK SESSIONS LIST REVIEW AND DISCUSSION FOR ADDITIONAL WORK SESSIONS ITEMS |
| G.1 - | April 29, 2009, Work Session | Item Action: None | | | Work Session Topics: Project Now and Response to Intervention (RtI) and Positive Behavior Support (PBS)
| | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
|
|
| H. | ADMINISTRATION’S TASK LIST REVIEW AND UPDATE |
| H.1 - | Task List Review 2 minutes | Item Action: None | | | The Administration Task List consists of requests from Board directors for information/analysis within specified time lines and will be reviewed and updated during this time. These requests should primarily be tasking for information/analysis and should not be for the scheduling of future agenda items. A recommendation should be included with the task for the purpose indicating as whether or not it needs to be included on the Calendar. Items may be added to the task list with the agreement of four Board Directors as indicated by head nods. Ref. Pages: 58-62 | | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
|
|
| I. | CALENDAR REVIEW AND UPDATE |
| I.1 - | Calendar Review 2 minutes | Item Action: None | | | The Board's Calendar will be reviewed and updated during this time.
Items may be added to the Calendar with the agreement of four Board Directors as indicated by head nods.
To look at district events and to access the District Calendar go to our home page at www.d11.org. On the left hand side of the screen, click on Calendars, then D11 Calendars. In the center of that page, in the drop down box, select District Calendar.
Upcoming meetings/events (tentative) refer to the attached Master Planning Calendar: - April 22, 2009, regular meeting
- April 29, 2009, work session
- May 6, 2009, regular meeting
- May 13, 2009, work session/retreat
- May 20, 2009, regular meeting
Ref. Pages: 63-75 | | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
|
|
| | | Item Action: None | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
| | adjourned | | | | The Board of Education adjourned at 10:53 p.m.
Julie Rene Stevens, Secretary to the Board of Education
| |
|
|