| |
Roll CallCharles Bobbitt, Director John Gudvangen, Treasurer Tami Hasling, President Sandra Mann, Director Bob Null, Director
Tom Strand, Vice-PresidentJanet Tanner, Secretary
|
Item Action:
None |
| |
|
Motions
|
|
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present at Roll Call were President Tami Hasling, Vice-President Tom Strand, Secretary Janet Tanner, and Directors Charlie Bobbitt, Sandra Mann and Bob Null. Treasurer John Gudvangen arrived after Adoption of the Agenda. Also present: Superintendent Dr. Terry Bishop, Deputy Superintendent of Personnel Support Services Dr. Mary Thurman, Chief Financial Officer/Deputy Superintendent Mr. Glenn Gustafson, Deputy Superintendent of Educational Support Services Mr. Michael Poore, Human Resources Division Head Mr. David Schenkel, Communications and Community Relations Director Ms. Elaine Naleski, and Secretary to the Board of Education Julie Rene Stevens.
|
|
|
|
| A.3 - |
Moment of Silence - |
| A.4 - |
Adoption of the Agenda - |
| |
The agenda presented to the Board in the Board’s packet will be considered for approval at this time. A Board Director or the Superintendent may request to, add, delete or table an item, i.e., an emergency school closure approval action that is in accordance with Policies. Board Directors shall make a separate motion for each item they seek to have added, deleted, or tabled. Reordering items on the agenda requires approval of a single motion with a majority vote of the quorum present.
A Board Director’s request that a non-emergency item be added to the agenda, as action shall require for approval a two-thirds majority of the entire Board. The Director making the request shall provide a copy of the motion and materials to all Board Directors. A Board Director’s request that a non-emergency item be added to the agenda, as non-action shall require for approval a majority of the quorum present. The Director making the request shall provide a copy of the motion and materials to all Board Directors.
|
Item Action:
Approved |
| |
Recommendation That the Board of Education adopts the agenda, as presented (and/or amended). |
|
| |
|
Motions
|
|
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
|
| Approve |
|
Tom Strand |
Jan Tanner |
Passed |
Director Strand moved that the Board of Education adopts the agenda, as amended by removing action item C.2. Contract Awards, and move C.5. Personnel Recommendations to Consent Items. Director Tanner seconded the motion, which passed, 6/0. Director Gudvangen was absent.
|
|
|
|
| A.5 - |
Executive Session - |
| |
The Board of Education may, under state statutes, go into Executive Session to discuss matters pertaining to:
1) property transactions [per C.R.S. 24-6-402(4)(a)] [particular matter:];
2) X legal advice [per C.R.S. 24-6-402(4)(b)] [particular matter: superintendent's contract];
3) security arrangements or investigations [per C.R.S. 24-6-402(4)(d)] [particular matter:];
4) X negotiations [per C.R.S. 24-6-402(4)(e)] [particular matter: superintendent's contract, Teachers, and Meet and Confer ESP, and Executive Professionals]
5) personnel [per C.R.S. 24-6-402(4)(f)] [particular matter: ];
6) individual student(s) [per C.R.S. 24-6-402(4)(h)] [particular matter: ]; 7) documents that may not be disclosed under the Colorado Open Records Act [per C.R.S. 24-6-402(4)(g)] [particular matter ]; and 8) matters required to be kept confidential by state or federal law [per C.R.S. 24-6-402(4)(c)][specific legal citation:]. Executive Session from approximately 5:30 p.m.-6:30 p.m. The Board of Education will reconvene into regular session at approximately 6:30 p.m.
|
Item Action:
Approved |
| |
Recommendation To convene into Executive Session. The Board of Education may, under state statutes, go into Executive Session to discuss matters pertaining to property transactions, legal advice, security arrangements or investigations, negotiations, personnel, individual students, documents that may not be disclosed under the Colorado Open Records Act and matters required to be kept confidential by law. |
|
| |
|
Motions
|
|
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
|
| Approve |
|
Tom Strand |
Jan Tanner |
Passed |
|
Director Strand moved to convene into executive session to discuss legal advice [per C.R.S. 24-6-402(4)(b)] [particular matter: superintendent's contract], and negotiations [per C.R.S. 24-6-402(4)(e)] [particular matter: superintendent's contract, Teachers, and Meet and Confer ESP, and Executive Professionals]. Director Tanner seconded the motion, which passed, 7/0.
|
|
|
|
| A.6 - |
Pledge of Allegiance - |
| A.8 - |
Modification of the Agenda - |
| B.1 - | Adoption of Consent Items - 2 minutes | Item Action: Approved | | | Consent items are placed in the consent portion of the agenda. If board members have any questions concerning these items, they should be directed to the Superintendent or designee prior to the board meeting. If discussion is required on any one of the items, it may be removed from the consent agenda. Those items indicated as being consent items will be adopted by one single motion unless a member of the board requests an item be removed from the consent agenda. Ref. Page: 10 | | | | Recommendation To adopt all consent items as designated in the agenda. Consent items: - B.2. Exclusive Chartering Authority
| | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
| | Approve | | Tom Strand | Charles Bobbitt | Passed | Director Strand moved that the Board of Education adopts all consent items as designated in the agenda. Director Bobbitt seconded the motion, which passed, 7/0.
Consent items:
- Exclusive Chartering Authority
- Personnel Recommendations
| |
|
| B.2 - | Personnel Recommendations-2 minutes | Item Action: None | | | The Division of Human Resources provides for consideration a list of Personnel Recommendations. The Board may remove an individual personnel recommendation for separate consideration by amending the original motion to approve the recommendation list. Presenters: Dr. Thurman/Mr. Schenkel
Ref. Pages: 26 & Under Separate Cover (personnel recommendations were not received before going to print)
| | | | Recommendation That the Board of Education approves the February 25, 2009, Personnel Recommendations, as submitted by the Administration.
| | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
| | | | | | The Board of Education approved the February 25, 2009, personnel recommendations. | |
|
| B.3 - | Exclusive Chartering Authority | Item Action: None | | | CRS 22-30.5-504 permits local Boards of Education to seek Exclusive Chartering Authority (ECA) within geographic boundaries of the school district. The statute was changed effective this year making it more difficult to obtain ECA, but once ECA is granted it does not have to be renewed each year, as in the past.
ECA gives the Board of Education the right to review each charter school application within its jurisdictional boundaries (on line charter school programs are an exception) or relinquish this authority on a case by case basis to the Colorado Charter School Institute (CSI).
If the Board of Education decides not to request ECA or the request is denied by the State Board of Education, charter school applicants will have the authority to apply to either our district and/or the Charter School Institute (CSI).
To retain ECA the Board of Education must present a written resolution to the State Board of Education on or before March 1, 2009.Ref. Pages: 11-19 | | | | Recommendation That the Board of Education approves the resolution to retain Exclusive Chartering Authority currently held by the District.
| | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
| | | | | | | The Board of Education approved the resolution to retain Exclusive Chartering Authority currently held by the District.
| |
|
| C.1 - | Citizens' Comments | Item Action: None | | | The Board as a representative body of the District wishes to provide an avenue for any citizen to express his/her interest and concerns for the schools. Accordingly, the public is cordially invited to attend Board meetings. Meetings of the Board are conducted for the purposes of carrying on the business of the Board and are closed to the public only during executive sessions. There are three 20-minute time periods designated for Citizens’ Comments:
1.) During the Preliminaries section of the agenda, as the last item before the start of the Consent Items for the purpose of addressing other concerns that are not Action or Non-Action items on the agenda, 2.) At the beginning of Action for the purpose of addressing action items only, and 3.) At the beginning of Non-Action for the purpose of addressing Non-Action items only. Except when otherwise specified by the Board President, comments by individual citizens in a given time period shall be limited to three minutes with a 30-second warning on the time limit. In order that the Board may fairly and adequately discharge its overall responsibilities, citizens who wish to make requests, representations or proposals to the Board are requested to direct these to the Superintendent, who will deal with them according to the regulations approved by the Board. Ref: Policy BEDH/BEDH-R. | | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
| | Sallie Clark | | | | Sallie Clark, county commissioner, topic: School Utilization Plan. Ms. Clark commented that a number of the schools in the utilization plan are in her commissioner district. She spoke regarding proposals, increased public process and providing more options to the board other than just closing schools. Ms. Clark commented that she thought the proposal to move elementary students into the West Middle School building had not been thought out as much as it should have. She said, "As an El Paso County Commissioner and as a resident of School District 11, of which I have worked for mill levy overrides and school issues in the past and appreciate the work that you all do, that we have a new superintendent coming and I would hope that you would think about not leaving him with a difficult job ahead of having a black mark on his record before he even comes to town. I think that it's important that we provide a good education for our kids; that we provide good schools and that we also provide a good public process, where parents and kids are taken into consideration as an integral part not looking from the outside in." She hoped the board would listen to some of the speakers coming after her, primarily the Council of Neighbors and Organizations (CONO) and recommendations made tonight. | | | Jerry Heimlicher | | | | Jerry Heimlicher, city councilmember, topic: School Utilization. Mr. Heimlicher referred to a letter from the mayor delivered to board members yesterday regarding the West Intergenerational Center. He spoke regarding the city's concern with details of that contract. He also stated that seven of the nine schools targeted for closure were in his district; he asked the board to consider giving more time for parent input and research into other alternatives other than West. | | | Pam Staley | | | | | Pam Staley, topic: School Utilization. Ms. Staley spoke in support of Midland International Baccalaureate School. She had concerns about moving the Midland IB program, moving the IB program without an authorized principal, "moving one hundred any kids into our program that are not on the same page will lower our composite score, according to the International Baccalaureate this will lose our authorization." Ms. Staley said that parents in her neighborhood would not follow the program to North Middle School.
| | | Diane Bean | | | | | Diane Bean, topic: School Utilization (Pike and others). Ms. Bean said change is inevitable, but when it happens it must be done with excellence. She said that what is being proposed is huge; she asked the board to please consider waiting before shutting the doors of the schools.
| | | Shirley Sharp | | | | | Shirley Sharp, topic: School Utilization (Washington). Ms. Sharp spoke regarding e-mails she sent and that she intentionally placed an error in the numbers to see if the board would catch it, no one caught it. She then commented that the utilization plan she read had quite a few big numbers that were wrong. She urged the board to slow down, get the correct data from the schools, not from a consultant. She asked board members to walk every school that is being proposed for closure.
| | | Marie Lopez | | | | | Marie Lopez, topic: School Utilization (Washington). Ms. Lopez said it seems as though the board has already made the decision and that this decision will destroy the west side. She said the board was not listening and that this decision will affect her life for the next four years. She asked the board to just listen to their pleas, comments and information.
| | | Kimbra Smith | | | | Dr. Kimbra Smith, assistant professor of Anthropology at UCCS, topic: Utilization Plan. Dr. Smith said she had spoken with some board members, and as they requested she was here tonight with a proposal that would benefit everyone. the first part of the proposal involved chartering a group of citizens and board members to come up with a strong and transparent business plan, one that addresses community concern , as well as district needs. The second part of the plan involves improving student success throughout the district, especially in less advantaged communities. Her research data shows that small schools are best; she could provide the board with this data before the March 11 meeting. She spoke further on "placed-based education." Dr. Smith said she and her UCCS colleague, Mike Larkin, promise to the district and to the board, a long-term commitment to this project, "We want our schools to succeed." She said they would seek and secure external funding and if the district needed to apply for grants, they would prepare those grants proposals, and set up a solid infrastructure for this project that would cost the district nothing beyond the normal investment in each school. Dr. Smith requested permission to work with interested schools in ways that would ensure their academic and financial success and adequate time to implement the programs. "Give us a year and assess us; then give us three more years and five pilot schools and assess us again; let us bring students back to District 11...my colleague, students and I are not politicians, and we're not consultants charging fees; we're simply educators who believe in dedicating time and energy to our schools. We want Colorado Springs to be a strong, vibrant community, not the desolate inner city wasteland you fear. Keep our neighborhood schools, keep your tens of millions of dollars in construction costs and let us assist you in helping every school succeed." | | | Dave Munger | | | | Dave Munger, topic: School Utilization. Mr. Munger restated Council of Neighbors and Organizations' (CONO' interest in being supportive of a more robust public process. Specifically, he suggested that if the board adopts the administration's plan, they do it in principle only and decide tonight to develop a process to fully engage the public and the business community in a review of that plan.
Mr. Munger said he was greeted at the door by a group of parents, who asked him to deliver a petition to the board, which he did.
| | | Sandy Clements Albertson | | | | | Sandy Clements Albertson, topic: School Utilization (Adams). Ms. Albertson asked the board to think of other alternatives. She suggested that the district go to a four day work/school week.
| | | Christine Smallwood | | | | | Christine Smallwood, Washington parent, topic: School Utilization. Ms. Smallwood said that she permits in to Washington because the school makes her children feel safe, "If you close it, they're not going to feel safe at all."
| | | Patrick Carter | | | | Patrick Carter, topic: School Utilization (Irving). Mr. Carter commented on the process and spoke in favor or saving Irving Middle School. Mr. Carter made reference to the new superintendent coming in and that it seemed logical that the new superintendent would have some input as to the direction the district is going. He also commented on the plan and that when it first came out, it was a ten-year plan. He said the faces of Irving Middle School were here tonight, and students in the audience stood for recognition. | |
|
| C.2 - | Contract Awards | Item Action: None | | | The purpose of this agenda item is to have a standing agenda item in place on a continual weekly basis. This agenda item will be used for capital investment and other contracts. Timing of contract actions is such that it will require continual expeditious board approval of contracts. Some weeks will not have any contracts, while many other weeks will have lists of proposed contracts for board approval. Each week a reference will be submitted listing any proposed contract actions with appropriate information. Solicitation documents and information about each procurement action are available for examination and review in the Business Office. | | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
| | There were no contract awards | | | | | |
|
| C.3 - | Budget Transfers, Appropriations and FTE Approvals - 20 minutes | Item Action: Approved | | | Board Policy DBJ-Budget Transfers requires the board to approve budget transfers for any fund when: (1) the aggregate amount to be transferred to support any line item, single issue or purpose exceeds $100,000; or (2) the accumulation of budget transfer needs is expected to significantly impact the annual budget; or (3) transfers from one major function category to another major function category exceed $20,000 or (4) strategic plan resource allocations need to be re prioritized. Board approval is also required for general fund contingency transfers over $50,000, or in the event the contingency reserve will be reduced by more than 25% for the fiscal year. Board policy DBJ also states that all capital reserve fund project budget appropriations shall be approved by the board; therefore, any transfer of unspent, or unencumbered monies to other projects, shall be approved by the board. CRS-32-109 (1) (f) (l) states the Board of Education has the specific duty to employ all personnel...and to fix and order paid their compensations. Since the budgetary impact of adding a new position must first be considered prior to the hiring process, Board approval is required when there is a proposed change to the authorized staffing level. | | | | Recommendation Contingency Transfer Request for PeopleSoft Consultation
That the Board of Education approves the General Fund contingency transfer request for additional PeopleSoft on-line application consultation in the amount of $20,625. Presenter: Mr. Schenkel Ref. Pages: 21-23
FTE Request for K-5 Math Trainer That the Board of Education approves the assignment of Julie Shaw as .5 K-5 Math trainer to be paid for out of the Curriculum and Instruction budget. Presenter: Mr. Malone Ref. Pages: 21-22 & 24-25 | | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
| | Approve | Contingency Transfer Request for PeopleSoft Consultation | Jan Tanner | Tom Strand | Passed | Dr. Bishop introduced the topic and turned over the presentations of the budget transfers to Deputy Superintendent/CFO Glenn Gustafson.
Mr. Gustafson spoke briefly to each item and turned over the explanation of the contingency transfer request to Human Resources Division Head David Schenkel. Mr. Schenkel explained in detail the request and why it was necessary.
Director Tanner moved that the Board of Education approves the General Fund contingency transfer request for additional PeopleSoft on-line application consultation in the amount of $20,625. Director Strand seconded the motion.
Questions and answers followed. Director Bobbitt asked if this wasn't part of the original contract. Ms. Schenkel responded no; the original contract was to get the base system up and running; they anticipated that there could be additional expense. Director Bobbitt commented that should have been taken into consideration on the original contract. Discussion continued.
The motion, that the Board of Education approves the General Fund contingency transfer request for additional PeopleSoft on-line application consultation in the amount of $20,625, passed, 6/1. Director Bobbitt voted no.
| | | Approve | FTE Request for K-5 Math Trainer | Tom Strand | Charles Bobbitt | Passed | Deputy Superintendent of Educational Support Services Mike Poore briefed the board on the topic. Director of Curriculum David Malone explained further the training costs with the math curriculum, Every Day Math.
Director Strand moved that the Board of Education approves the assignment of Julie Shaw as .5 K-5 Math trainer to be paid for out of the Curriculum and Instruction budget. Director Bobbitt seconded the motion. Questions and answers followed.
The motion, that the Board of Education approves the assignment of Julie Shaw as .5 K-5 Math trainer to be paid for out of the Curriculum and Instruction budget, passed, 7/0.
| |
|
| C.4 - | New Superintendent | Item Action: Approved | | | Recommendation That the Board of Education offers the Superintendent position to _____________________, whose employment shall be contingent upon successful contract negotiations.
| | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
| | Approve | | Charles Bobbitt | Tom Strand | Passed | President Hasling commented that two board members traveled to Orlando, Florida to interview Orange County Public School District personnel on Dr. Nicholas Gledich. She asked those board members to speak about their trip and findings.
Director Gudvangen spoke first. He and Director Bobbitt met with twenty-eight people and seven formal groups. Orange County Public School District is the eleventh largest school district in the nation, with approximately 176,000 students; board members are paid $45,000 per year. Director Gudvangen commented that it was extremely useful to do a site visit and explained why he felt that way. He commented that he had different first choice for a superintendent; however, the board had three great finalists for the position, and it was good for him to go to Florida. "For me in some ways, this was all the harder to be able to go and ask some hard questions knowing that I probably would have chosen someone different than who we're going to go with. Let me also say this, I want it to be a great start for the new superintendent and that will be Dr. Gledich; I want it to be a 7/0 vote and he is the one candidate who can get that support from the entire board, which I think is crucial. I also think it is clear that we have a really fine candidate to support here." Director Gudvangen summarized when they met with Dr. Gledich's direct reports, the first thing they told them was that as their boss, they had produced the best work they have ever done professionally; he inspires them. Support staff indicated that they respect and like Dr. Gledich; he trusts them, and therefore, they give their trust back to him. It was made clear to Directors Bobbitt and Gudvangen that the superintendent turns to Dr. Gledich often as the problem solver, the person who can handle difficult situations. An area superintendent for the Orange County Public School system oversees a school system larger than our district. He has experience in both the operational and academic side. Director Gudvangen commented that the Chief Academic Officer spoke with he and Director Bobbitt, she said Dr. Gledich is the brightest person she knows and that he makes the connection across all areas. This is a person of integrity, friendship and a strong home base.
Director Bobbitt echoed Director Gudvangen's comments, and said that Dr. Gledich has a great sense of humor, he's a good guy. Nothing but glowing, positive comments. Director Bobbitt said he felt that Dr. Gledich will bring a lot of pluses that will really help our district and staff.
President Hasling thanked both Director Gudvangen and Bobbitt for traveling out to Florida for the site visit.
Director Bobbitt moved that the Board of Education offers the Superintendent position to Dr. Nicholas Gledich, whose employment shall be contingent upon successful contract negotiations. Director Strand seconded the motion. Comments from each board member followed.
The motion, that the Board of Education offers the Superintendent position to Dr. Nicholas Gledich, whose employment shall be contingent upon successful contract negotiations, passed, 7/0.
| |
|
| C.5 - | Read Across America Resolution - 5 minutes | Item Action: Approved | | | “Read Across America” is a national celebration of Dr. Seuss’s birthday, promoting reading and adult involvement in the education of a community’s students. Presenters: Dr. Thurman/Mr. Schenkel/Mr. Marshall
Ref. Pages: 27-28 | | | | Recommendation That the Board of Education approves the resolution endorsing “Read Across America,” as submitted by the Administration.
| | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
| | Approve | | Tom Strand | Bob Null | Passed | Dr. Thurman spoke briefly about Read Across America and turned the podium over to Mr. Kevin Marshall, president of Colorado Springs Education Association (CSEA). Mr. Marshall advised that CSEA and district teachers founded two libraries that benefit children and families in our district, one at New Hope, which provides temporary housing for those in need and the other at the Tesla child care center. He read a poem by Denise Coughlin, a teacher at Keller Elementary School, inspired by Dr. Seuss. Mr. Marshall thanked the board for supporting the National Education Association's Read Across America program.
Director Strand read the resolution endorsing Read Across America.
Director Strand moved that the Board of Education approves the resolution endorsing "Read Across America, " as submitted by the administration. Director Null seconded the motion, which passed, 7/0. | |
|
| C.6 - | School Utilization Plan - 60 minutes | Item Action: None | | | District 11 has been engaged in numerous forms of utilization studies and recommendations over the past ten years. This year the Board hired a consultant team that conducted a utilization study. That study shared patterns of enrollment as well as projections for future enrollment. The District Administration Team then formed a Steering Committee to assist in developing a recommendation, created a community involvement plan, and provided guidance in our delivery to you as a Board. Presenters: Mr. Poore and team
Ref. Page: 29 | | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
| | Approve | 1. A. Recommendation: Elementary Schools, Motions, Vote | Tom Strand | Bob Null | Passed | Dr. Bishop turned over the topic and presentation to Mr. Poore. Mr. Poore provided a brief history of the process to date and guided the board to the recommendations.
President Hasling provided direction on how she saw the board proceeding with the recommendations and amendments to the motions.
I. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR IMPLEMENTATION BEGINNING AUGUST 1, 2009 FOR THE 2009-2010 SCHOOL YEAR.
A. Recommendation: Elementary Schools
Director Strand moved that the Board of Education directs the administration to work with students, staff, and community in taking the appropriate steps to close the following elementary buildings and assist in the movement of children and programs based on a boundary study to be completed and approved by the Board of Education on or before April 30, 2009. All factors listed in the Utilization PLAN are to be considered as these moves are planned. These closures and redistribution of students will be effective August 1, 2009.
a. Buena Vista, Washington, and Whittier predominantly to the West building
b. Ivywild
c. Pike
d. Combine Adams and Hunt into the Hunt building
e. Longfellow
f. Jefferson
2. The Board of Education directs the administration to immediately develop plans to add an addition onto Jackson that will house any additional students that will be assigned to that site from the boundary changes caused by the closing of Pike. Plans are to be presented to the Board of Education for approval in a timely manner so that the addition could be ready for occupation by second semester of the 2009-2010 school year.
Director Null seconded the motion. Amendments followed:
Director Bobbitt moved to take each item as an individual motion. Director Null seconded the motion. Comments followed. The motion to take each item individually, failed, 4/3. Directors Gudvangen, Hasling, Mann and Tanner voted no.
Director Null moved with regard to Buena Vista, that the district not separate the traditional strand from the Montessori strand. Director Strand seconded the motion. Discussion followed. The motion to not separate the traditional strand from the Montessori strand failed, 5/2. Directors Gudvangen, Hasling, Mann, Strand and Tanner voted no.
Director Bobbitt moved to remove or strike item "b." Ivywild from the recommendation, thus not closing Ivywild. Director Null seconded the motion. Questions and answers followed. The motion to remove Ivywild from consideration of closure failed, 5/2. Directors Gudvangen, Hasling, Mann, Strand and Tanner voted no.
Director Bobbitt moved to delay the closure of Pike one year. Director Null seconded the motion. Discussion followed. The motion to delay the closure of Pike one year failed 5/2. Directors Gudvangen, Hasling, Mann, Strand and Tanner voted no.
Director Bobbitt moved to amend the main motion, item "d." to say "combine Hunt into Adams." Director Strand seconded the motion. Discussion followed. The motion to amend the main motion to say "combine Hunt into Adams" failed, 4/3. Directors Hasling, Null, Strand and Tanner voted no.
Director Bobbitt moved to amend the main motion removing item "e. Longfellow" and keep Longfellow open. Director Null seconded the motion. Comments followed. The motion to remove Longfellow from the main motion and consideration of closure failed 5/2. Directors Gudvangen, Hasling, Mann, Strand and Tanner voted no.
Director Bobbitt moved to not move any students to poorer performing schools than their original school. Director Null seconded the motion. Discussion followed. The motion failed, 6/1. Directors Gudvangen, Hasling, Mann, Null, Strand and Tanner voted no.
The main motion that the Board of Education directs the administration to work with students, staff, and community in taking the appropriate steps to close the following elementary buildings and redistribute (assist in the movement) of students and programs based on a boundary study to be completed and approved by the Board of Education on or before April 30, 2009. All factors listed in the Utilization PLAN are to be considered as these moves are planned. These closures and redistribution of students will be effective August 1, 2009.
a. Buena Vista, Washington, and Whittier predominantly to the West building (B.2 & b.5) b. Ivywild (B.7)
c. Pike (C.1)
d. Combine Adams and Hunt into the Hunt building (D.1)
e. Longfellow (E.3)
f. Jefferson (D.5)
and,
2. The Board of Education directs the administration to immediately develop plans to add an addition onto Jackson that will house any additional students that will be assigned to that site from the boundary changes caused by the closing of Pike. Plans are to be presented to the Board of Education for approval in a timely manner so that the addition could be ready for occupation by second semester of the 2009-2010 school year. (C.4), passed, 5/2. Directors Bobbitt and Null voted no.
| | | Approve | B. Recommendations for Reuse of Closed Buildings | Jan Tanner | Tom Strand | Passed | B. Recommendation: Reuse of closed buildings Director Tanner moved that the Board of Education directs the administration to work with appropriate groups to place programs in buildings which have been closed. These options to be presented to the Board of Education no later than May 1, 2009.
a. Move the Montessori program to the Washington site effective August 1, 2009.
b. Move the Hearing Impaired program from Jefferson to the Stratton site effective August 1, 2009.
c. Move the Adult Education program from Hunt to the Jefferson site effective August 1, 2009.
d. Move the Home School program from Audubon to Jefferson effective August, 2009.
e. Work with representatives from GLOBE Charter School to use one wing of Longfellow with the charter school taking responsibility for all overhead costs for the use of (or part of) the building.
f. Develop a plan to move AERO out of leased space no later than August 1, 2009.
Director Strand seconded the motion. Discussion followed.
Director Bobbitt moved that the Board of Education directs administration to provide additional support to the Montessori program in Washington. There was no second; therefore, the motion died.
Director Bobbitt moved to delete or remove item "d. move the home school program from Audubon to Jefferson effective August 2009." Director Strand seconded the motion. Discussion followed. The motion failed, 5/2. Directors Gudvangen, Hasling, Mann, Null and Tanner voted no.
Director Bobbitt moved to delete or remove item "f. Develop a plan to move AERO out of leased space no later than August 1, 2009." Director Null seconded. Discussion followed. The motion failed 6/1. Directors Gudvangen, Hasling, Mann, Null, Strand and Tanner voted no.
Director Gudvangen asked for clarification on item "e." saying, "I don't know if we need to limit our options at what might go to Longfellow, maybe this isn't limiting them." Would this provide limitations on further options for Longfellow in addition to GLOBE. Mr. Poore responded that administration felt the board gave them direction to find a spot for GLOBE. This was administration's best recommendation on where to locate GLOBE. Discussion continued on space utilization. Mr. Poore advised that the other part of the recommendation for the Longfellow building utilization was to pursue a 'for profit' preschool option, to explore that. Director Gudvangen was satisfied with the response.
The main motion passed, 7/0. Motion: that the Board of Education directs the administration to work with appropriate groups to place programs in buildings which have been closed. These options to be presented to the Board of Education no later than May 1, 2009.
a. Move the Montessori program to the Washington site effective August 1, 2009.
b. Move the Hearing Impaired program from Jefferson to the Stratton site effective August 1, 2009.
c. Move the Adult Education program from Hunt to the Jefferson site effective August 1, 2009.
d. Move the Home School program from Audubon to Jefferson effective August, 2009.
e. Work with representatives from GLOBE Charter School to use one wing of Longfellow with the charter school taking responsibility for all overhead costs for the use of (or part of) the building.
f. Develop a plan to move AERO out of leased space no later than August 1, 2009.
| | | Approve | C. Recommendations for Middle School | John Gudvangen | Charles Bobbitt | Passed | C. Recommendation: Middle School
Director Gudvangen moved that the Board of Education directs the administration to work with students, staff, and community in taking the appropriate steps to place no students at Emerson Middle School for the 2009-10 school year and leave Irving Middle School open for the 2009-10 school year. Director Bobbitt seconded the motion.
Director Gudvangen commented that he wasn't ready to say it's time to close Irving; however, he did not want to have two middle schools operating next year, both Emerson and Irving, saying, "I don't think I'm ready to close Irving and I don't think we're ready to open Emerson." Discussion followed on the ramifications of this motion and the partnership with the Space Foundation to place them at the Emerson facility. Mr. Poore said that the grade configuration at Emerson was on tonight's agenda and was still to be decided, and that the Space Foundation wanted to be good partners with the district and was willing to look at other locations beyond Emerson, but their preferred site was Emerson. Discussion continued.
Director Mann called the vote, which immediately stopped discussion, and passed, 5/2. Directors Bobbitt and Gudvangen voted no.
Secretary to the Board of Education Julie Stevens asked President Hasling if she would like her to read the motion approved by the board on December 17, 2008. President Hasling gave her permission to read the approved motion from the 12-17-08 meeting on the Emerson issue, which was that the Board of Education approves that the Emerson-Edison Academy be restructured as required by NCLB for the 2009-2010 school year, to re-open as a District 11 school. Further move that the Board of Education directs administration to hire and principal and administrative assistant to facilitate the opening of the new District 11 school with such funds approved for fiscal year 08/09 general fund contingency fund. This motion passed, 7/0 on December.
Director Gudvangen protested that this was not pertinent to the motion and that the board should move immediately to vote on the main motion. The board then went straight to the vote: the motion that the Board of Education directs the administration to work with students, staff, and community in taking the appropriate steps to place no students at Emerson Middle School for the 09/10 school year and leave Irving Middle School open for the 09/10 school year, failed, 2/5. Directors Hasling, Mann, Null, Strand and Tanner voted no.
Director Mann moved that the Board of Education work with the Space Foundation to move the program to Irving, that the district keeps Irving open, and that the district does not open Emerson in the fall. Director Bobbitt seconded the motion. Discussion followed.
Director Null commented that he felt there might be a legal issue with this motion and moved amend the motion, replacing "Irving" with "Emerson." He said Director Mann's motion contradicts what the board approved in December. There was no second to Director Null's amendment. The board returned to Director Mann's motion. Discussion continued on the partnership with the Space Foundation and providing them with a facility.
Director Mann amended her motion to say, keep Irving open, but do not open Emerson, and that the board rescind the December 17, 2008, approval of keeping Emerson open and to work with the Space Foundation to see what best fits for that partnership. Director Bobbitt seconded the amendment. Discussion continued.
President Hasling and Ms. Naleski noted that the board would need to pass this vote on a two-thirds majority (to rescind a previous vote). Director Gudvangen suggested that the part about the board rescinding the December 17, 2008, approval of keeping Emerson open be kept out of Director Mann's motion, leaving three pieces to the motion being considered: leave Irving open, don't open Emerson, and work with the Space Foundation to find an appropriate location. Director Mann agreed, but Director Null disagreed. Director Mann said she wanted to make sure the board rescinds their prior vote to place the Space Foundation at Emerson, and keep Irving open and work with the Space Foundation to find another location. The motion failed 4/3. Directors Hasling, Null, Strand and Tanner voted no.
Director Strand moved that the Board of Education directs the administration to work with students, staff, and community in taking the appropriate steps to close Irving Middle School and assist in the movement of students and programs based on a boundary study to be completed and approved by the Board of Education on or before April 30, 2009. All factors listed in the Utilization PLAN are to be considered as these moves are planned. This closure and redistribution of students will be effective August 1, 2009. Director Null seconded the motion. Discussion followed. The motion passed, 4/3. Directors Bobbitt, Gudvangen and Mann voted no.
Approved motion: that the Board of Education directs the administration to work with students, staff, and community in taking the appropriate steps to close Irving Middle School and redistribute students and programs based on a boundary study to be completed and approved by the Board of Education on or before April 30, 2009. All factors listed in the Utilization PLAN are to be considered as these moves are planned. This closure and redistribution of students will be effective August 1, 2009.
| | | Approve | D. Recommendations for High School | Tom Strand | Bob Null | Passed | D. Recommendation: High School Director Strand moved that the Bijou Alternative School into the Whittier building effective August 1, 2009. Director Null seconded the motion, which passed, 7/0.
| | | Approve | E. Recommendation to Develop a Plan for Boundary Changes | Bob Null | Tom Strand | Passed | E. Recommendation to Develop a Plan for Boundary Changes
Director Null moved that the Board of Education directs the administration to immediately develop a plan for boundary changes for the 2009-2010 school year that will institute the changes approved above and present a plan to the Board of Education no later than April 15, 2009. All factors listed in the Utilization PLAN are to be considered as these changes are planned. Director Strand seconded the motion, which passed, 6/1. Director Bobbitt voted no.
| | | Approve | F. Recommendation to Develop a Plan for Administration Reduction of $1 million | Jan Tanner | Bob Null | Passed | F. Recommendation to Develop a Plan for Administration Reduction of $1 million
Director Tanner moved that the Board of Education directs the administration to develop a plan for a central administration reduction of at least one million dollars effective in August, 2010. Director Null seconded the motion.
Director Strand moved to amend the motion by deleting the word "central" from the motion. Director Mann seconded the amendment, which passed, 6/1. Director Bobbitt voted no.
The main motion, as amended, passed, 6/1. Director Bobbitt voted no.
| | | Approve | II. A. 1. Wasson | Tom Strand | Bob Null | | II. Recommendations for Study During the 2009-2010 School Year, A. A. 1. Director Strand moved that the Board of Education directs the administration to work with appropriate groups during the 2009-2010 school year to complete a plan/study for the following items: that would allow Wasson High School to remain a comprehensive high school for at least three years, with boundaries, and further that it have math, science and arts magnet or similar specialized programs, and also Wasson should pursue a series of specialized career pathway programs, and that Mitchell high school should also be provided support and involvement in career pathway programs. Director Null seconded the motion. Discussion followed.
Director Gudvangen moved to amend the motion by striking the phrase, "career and technical pathway programs" for both Wasson and Mitchell high schools. Director Null seconded this motion. Director Gudvangen spoke to his amendment. The amendment passed, 7/0.
The main motion was amended to read, allow Wasson High School to remain a comprehensive high school for at least 3 years with boundaries and further have math, science and arts magnet or similar specialized programs. Discussion followed. This motion failed 4/3. Directors Gudvangen, Hasling, Mann and Tanner voted no.
Director Null moved that Wasson remain as is, a comprehensive high school with boundaries and re-evaluate in three years. Director Bobbitt seconded the motion. Discussion followed. The motion failed, 4/3. Directors Gudvangen, Hasling, Mann and Tanner voted no.
Director Tanner moved that the Board of Education directs the administration to work with appropriate groups during the 2009-2010 school year to complete a plan/study for the following item: make Wasson a small magnet high school, with no defined boundaries, for performing arts and math science. The plan is to be presented to the Board of Education no later than February 1, 2010 for approval and implementation in August, 2010. Director Mann seconded the motion. Discussion followed. This motion failed, 4/3. Directors Bobbitt, Gudvangen, Null and Strand voted no.
Director Gudvangen moved to close Wasson and re-distribute the students to the other four high schools. No second was received; the motion died.
Director Hasling moved that the Board of Education directs the administration to work with appropriate groups during the 2009-2010 school year to complete a plan/study for the following item: make Wasson a magnet, with a boundary that would potentially place 1200-1400 students in a high school for performing arts and math science. The plan is to be presented to the Board of Education no later than February 1, 2010 for approval and implementation in August, 2010. Director Null seconded the motion. Discussion followed.
Director Tanner moved to amend the motion, striking the words, "that would potentially place 1200-1400 students." Director Gudvangen seconded the motion, which passed, 4/3.
Director Bobbitt moved to delay this decision until the next board meeting to give the administration and Wasson staff time to come up with something better. The motion received no second and therefore died.
The motion on the table now read: that the Board of Education directs the administration to work with appropriate groups during the 2009-2010 school year to complete a plan/study for the following item: make Wasson a magnet high school, with a boundary, for performing arts and math science. The plan is to be presented to the Board of Education no later than February 1, 2010 for approval and implementation in August, 2010. This motion failed, 4/3. Directors Bobbitt, Gudvangen, Null and Strand voted no.
Director Bobbitt moved that the Board of Education task administration to work with the Wasson staff to come up with a recommendation for the board to look at in two weeks. Director Strand seconded the motion, which passed, 7/0.
| | | Approve | II. A. 2.- 21. | Jan Tanner | Tom Strand | Passed | Director Tanner moved that the Board of Education directs the administration to work with appropriate groups during the 2009-2010 school year to complete a plan/study for the following items: 2-21, as printed. Director Strand seconded the motion. Discussion followed.
Points covered:
The K-8 philosophy (integrated K8).
#13 (Read to Achieve/Reading First).
#4 & 5 Discussion followed. The board wondered if there was space at Wasson to accommodate both Food Service and the Special Education Department? Mr. Poore responded that the study would look into that aspect. Mr. Poore also commented that the district administration would like some flexibility to sift through the offers coming in on utilization of district facilities; he mentioned that BOCES had contacted the district to see about space in a district building on the west side. The board agreed to a friendly amendment to look within the entire district for space, not just at Wasson.
#2 Director Null suggested that the wording be modified. His concern with the phrase, "full capacity." Mr. Poore said they would look at that.
#3 Director Null had a concern about implementation in the middle of a school year. He suggested adding the word "possible" before "implementation in second semester" to the sentence. Director Null also referenced #11, and stated his concern about capacity at McAuliffe. Mr. Bernhard replied that this would be part of a boundary study.
#19 Director Bobbitt had a concern about staffing formulas or developing formulas. He asked for sensitivity and balance, and suggested that administration look at the demographics, as well as the number of students in a school.
This motion passed, 7/0.
| | | Approve | II. B. Develop a Plan for Boundary Changes | Tom Strand | Bob Null | Passed | | Director Strand moved that the Board of Education directs the administration to continue to develop a plan for boundary changes for the 2010-2011 school year that would institute the changes approved by the Board of Education during the 2009-2010 school year and present such plan to the Board of Education no later than March 15, 2010. All factors listed in the Utilization PLAN are to be considered as these are planned. Director Null seconded the motion. Discussion followed. The motion passed, 6/0. Director Bobbitt was absent.
| | | Approve | III. A. Three to Five Year Planning-Re-build or Re-model Schools | Jan Tanner | Tom Strand | Passed | THREE TO FIVE YEAR PLANNING A. Director Tanner moved that the Board of Education directs the administration to develop plans that would rebuild or substantially remodel Hunt, Midland and West and add additions onto Howbert and Bristol. Such plans are to be given to the Board of Education by October, 2009 for possible consideration when funds might be available in the future. Director Strand seconded the motion. Discussion followed. The motion passed, 6/0. Director Bobbitt was absent.
| | | Approve | III. B. Three to Five Year Planning- Cost Savings Moves | Tom Strand | Bob Null | Passed | | Director Strand moved that the Board of Education directs the administration to explore the cost savings of moving Security and Community Services out of the two small buildings to another location for the 2010-2011 school year. Director Null seconded the motion. Discussion followed. The motion passed, 6/0. Director Bobbitt was absent.
| | | Dr. Bishop's Statement | | | | Dr. Bishop read a statement:
"We realize that the School Reutilization process has been a difficult one for parents, communities, staff and the Board of Education. As I have said to many different groups, many times, there is no more difficult decision than school closures and reutilization. We have tried to involve as many stakeholders and to analyze as much data as logistically possible. In the end, we believe that the decision you have made tonight ,and the next few weeks, is the best thing for the district as a whole, in order to allow us to remain as competitive as possible in our never-ending quest for student achievement. We also believe, that just like our country, we believe that District 11 will bounce back stronger than before.
The safety and education of our students is the most important component of our mission. We want to assure parents, students, staff and neighborhoods that we will now be doing everything possible to make this transition as smooth as possible with the least disruption of our communities. We will immediately begin the process of preparing for these changes. We are planning to immediately break into project teams to address every single issue that we might encounter during this transition. We know that we have facility modifications to design, compete, contract and implement. We know that school boundaries will have to change; we actually have a plan that we will be sending you this Friday in Friday Night Notes of how we plan to go about that. We know that programs will have to be adjusted. We know that vacated buildings and their uses will need to be finalized. And, we know that staff and students have to be moved to new environments. We are prepared to carry forward these plans with the highest priority of diligence and consideration because our most valuable asset, our students, need to be protected.
Our measure of success will be based upon the happy and satisfied students, as they walk into their new schools on the first day in August, and we promise to deliver this outcome as smoothly and expeditiously as possible."
Dr. Bishop advised the board that his team would meet immediately after this meeting adjourned to formulate a document that will be given to principals. There will also be a press release and an "all" e-mail out to staff. Dr. Bishop will meet with elementary principals at 8:30 a.m. this morning. Dr. Bishop confirmed that the board wanted a recommendation on Wasson at the March 11 meeting.
Director Null asked Dr. Bishop if they would contact Dr. Kimbra Smith and CONO representatives to involve them in the process. Dr. Bishop deferred to Mr. Poore, who advised that he had been attempting to speak with Dr. Smith, but not CONO representatives. He asked board members to help him with that contact.
Director Null commended district staff for their hard work and thanked the citizens who sat through this. He felt the board did what they needed to do tonight. President Hasling echoed his remarks and spoke of time to heal and how she, as a parent, has had to adjust to changes made in the district.
| |
|
| C.7 - | Emerson Structure - 60 minutes | Item Action: Approved | | | The Board of Education voted December 17, 2008, to restructure Emerson Edison Charter school as a District 11 school for the 2009-10 school year as a result of the school failing to make AYP for six consecutive years. The federal No Child Left Behind legislation requires school districts to restructure Title I schools that are unable to make AYP.
Presenters: Mr. Poore/Ms. Provenzano/Ms. ClaybaughRef. Pages: 30-35 | | | | Recommendation That the Board of Education approves one of the following options: Option A - Open as a 6th grade only
- Partnership with the Space Foundation
Option B - 6th grade with Space Foundation
- 7th and 8th grade traditional curriculum
Option C - Expand 6th grade to include Irving 6th grade students
- 7th and 8th grade students stay at Irving (for two years)
Option D - Space Foundation only
- No students for 2009-2010
| | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
| | Approve | | Tom Strand | Bob Null | Passed | Executive Director Jackie Provenzano advised board members that administration recommends Option B and she explained why.
Director Strand moved that the Board of Education approves Option B, sixth grade with Space Foundation and seventh and eighth grade traditional curriculum. Director Null seconded the motion. Discussion followed. Director Strand asked Ms. Provenzano if the district would be doing it this way because they had to or because it would be successful implementing one grade at a time.
Ms. Provenzano commented that administration would prefer to open only to sixth grade only and to build the program; that is the favorite option. However, it isn't to say that they haven't opened three grades at once in a school. It can be done, the district has the talent and resources to get it done. Administration is not convinced that it would be in the best interests of the district or children to open sixth grade only at Emerson at this time and put other kids in other schools that may have to change later. She said in the best interest of kids, this is the best option. The motion that the Board of Education approves Option B, opening to sixth grade students with the Space Foundation and seventh and eighth grades with traditional curriculum passed, 6/0. Director Bobbitt was absent. | |
|
| D.1 - | Citizens' Comments | Item Action: None | | | The Board as a representative body of the District wishes to provide an avenue for any citizen to express his/her interest and concerns for the schools. Accordingly, the public is cordially invited to attend Board meetings. Meetings of the Board are conducted for the purposes of carrying on the business of the Board and are closed to the public only during executive sessions. There are three 20-minute time periods designated for Citizens’ Comments:
1.) During the Preliminaries section of the agenda, as the last item before the start of the Consent Items for the purpose of addressing other concerns that are not Action or Non-Action items on the agenda, 2.) At the beginning of Action for the purpose of addressing action items only, and 3.) At the beginning of Non-Action for the purpose of addressing Non-Action items only. Except when otherwise specified by the Board President, comments by individual citizens in a given time period shall be limited to three minutes with a 30-second warning on the time limit. In order that the Board may fairly and adequately discharge its overall responsibilities, citizens who wish to make requests, representations or proposals to the Board are requested to direct these to the Superintendent, who will deal with them according to the regulations approved by the Board. Ref: Policy BEDH/BEDH-R. | | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
|
|
| E. | REPORTS AND DISCUSSION ITEMS |
| E.1 - | Board Subcommittee Reports | Item Action: None | | | Board members will have the opportunity to report on their respective subcommittees. | | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
|
|
| E.2 - | Superintendent/Administrative Reports | Item Action: None | | | This agenda item is reserved for presentations, status reports, and announcements to the Board by the Superintendent and the Administration that have not been provided as information only in the Board packets. Unless otherwise directed by the Board, annual and standing reports not requiring Board action are to be provided in hard copy for information only in the Board Director packets. The superintendent has the opportunity to report on a range of topics during this time. | | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
|
|
| E.3 - | Other Discussion Items | Item Action: None | | | Board members will have the opportunity for open discussion. | | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
| | | | | | President Hasling confirmed that there will be a special meeting/work session on March 4, 2009, at 6:00 p.m. Agenda items for the special meeting would be an executive session to discuss the superintendent's contract; Work Session items: Update on Project Now Task Force, QPG Presentation, and the DAAC Budget Committee Preliminary Report. There was discussion on whether the board would address all these items or not. Board members will meet with Dr. Bishop to make that determination.
The Board of Education will hold a special meeting on March 4, 2009, executive session only, to discuss the new superintendent’s contract.
| |
|
| F.1 - | New Agenda Items from Board Discussion | Item Action: None | | | Board members have the opportunity to bring forward items for a future agenda. | | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
|
|
| F.2 - | Magnet School Concepts - TBD | Item Action: None | | | Magnet School Concepts will be presented sometime after the November elections. | | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
|
|
| G. | FUTURE WORK SESSIONS LIST REVIEW AND DISCUSSION FOR ADDITIONAL WORK SESSIONS ITEMS |
| H. | ADMINISTRATION’S TASK LIST REVIEW AND UPDATE |
| H.1 - | Task List Review 2 minutes | Item Action: None | | | The Administration Task List consists of requests from Board directors for information/analysis within specified time lines and will be reviewed and updated during this time. These requests should primarily be tasking for information/analysis and should not be for the scheduling of future agenda items. A recommendation should be included with the task for the purpose indicating as whether or not it needs to be included on the Calendar. Items may be added to the task list with the agreement of four Board Directors as indicated by head nods. Ref. Pages: 37-41 | | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
|
|
| I. | CALENDAR REVIEW AND UPDATE |
| I.1 - | Calendar Review 2 minutes | Item Action: None | | | The Board's Calendar will be reviewed and updated during this time.
Items may be added to the Calendar with the agreement of four Board Directors as indicated by head nods.
To look at district events and to access the District Calendar go to our home page at www.d11.org. On the left hand side of the screen, click on Calendars, then D11 Calendars. In the center of that page, in the drop down box, select District Calendar.
Upcoming meetings/events (tentative) refer to the attached Master Planning Calendar: - February 23, 2009, work session
- February 25, 2009, regular meeting
- March 4, 2009, work session
- March 11, 2009, regular meeting
Ref. Pages: 42-53 | | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
|
|
| | | Item Action: None | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
| | adjourned | | | | The Board of Education adjourned at 12:35 a.m.
Julie Rene Stevens, Secretary to the Board of Education
| |
|
|