| |
Roll CallCharles Bobbitt, Director John Gudvangen, Treasurer Tami Hasling, President Sandra Mann, Director Bob Null, Director
Tom Strand, Vice-PresidentJanet Tanner, Secretary
|
Item Action:
None |
| |
|
Motions
|
|
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present at Roll Call were President Tami Hasling, Vice-President Tom Strand, Secretary Janet Tanner, Treasurer John Gudvangen, and Directors Charlie Bobbitt, Bob Null and Sandra Mann. Also present: Superintendent Dr. Terry Bishop, Deputy Superintendent of Personnel Support Services Dr. Mary Thurman, Chief Financial Officer/Deputy Superintendent Mr. Glenn Gustafson, Deputy Superintendent of Educational Support Services Mr. Michael Poore, Human Resources Division Head Mr. David Schenkel, Communications and Community Relations Director Ms. Elaine Naleski, and Secretary to the Board of Education Julie Rene Stevens.
|
|
|
|
| A.3 - |
Moment of Silence - |
| A.4 - |
Adoption of the Agenda - |
| |
The agenda presented to the Board in the Board’s packet will be considered for approval at this time. A Board Director or the Superintendent may request to, add, delete or table an item, i.e., an emergency school closure approval action that is in accordance with Policies. Board Directors shall make a separate motion for each item they seek to have added, deleted, or tabled. Reordering items on the agenda requires approval of a single motion with a majority vote of the quorum present.
A Board Director’s request that a non-emergency item be added to the agenda, as action shall require for approval a two-thirds majority of the entire Board. The Director making the request shall provide a copy of the motion and materials to all Board Directors. A Board Director’s request that a non-emergency item be added to the agenda, as non-action shall require for approval a majority of the quorum present. The Director making the request shall provide a copy of the motion and materials to all Board Directors.
|
Item Action:
Approved |
| |
Recommendation That the Board of Education adopts the agenda, as presented (and/or amended).
|
|
| |
|
Motions
|
|
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
|
| Approve |
|
Tom Strand |
John Gudvangen |
Passed |
|
Director Strand moved to adopt the agenda with the following amendments: remove action items C2-Contract Awards and C3-Budget Transfers, Appropriations or FTE Approvals, as there were no contract awards or budget transfers, appropriations or FTE approvals; add a Personnel Addendum to the Personnel Recommendations. Director Gudvangen seconded the motion, which passed, 7/0.
|
|
|
|
| A.5 - |
Executive Session - |
| |
The Board of Education may, under state statutes, go into Executive Session to discuss matters pertaining to:
1) property transactions [per C.R.S. 24-6-402(4)(a)] [particular matter:]; 2) legal advice [per C.R.S. 24-6-402(4)(b)] [particular matter: ]; 3) security arrangements or investigations [per C.R.S. 24-6-402(4)(d)] [particular matter:]; 4) negotiations [per C.R.S. 24-6-402(4)(e)] [particular matter: ]5) X personnel [per C.R.S. 24-6-402(4)(f)] [particular matter: personnel matters];6) individual student(s) [per C.R.S. 24-6-402(4)(h)] [particular matter: ]; 7) documents that may not be disclosed under the Colorado Open Records Act [per C.R.S. 24-6-402(4)(g)] [particular matter ]; and 8) matters required to be kept confidential by state or federal law [per C.R.S. 24-6-402(4)(c)][specific legal citation:].
Executive Session from approximately 5:30 p.m.-6:30 p.m. The Board of Education will reconvene into regular session at approximately 6:30 p.m.
|
Item Action:
Approved |
| |
Recommendation To convene into Executive Session. The Board of Education may, under state statutes, go into Executive Session to discuss matters pertaining to property transactions, legal advice, security arrangements or investigations, negotiations, personnel, individual students, documents that may not be disclosed under the Colorado Open Records Act and matters required to be kept confidential by law. |
|
| |
|
Motions
|
|
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
|
| Approve |
|
John Gudvangen |
Charles Bobbitt |
Passed |
Director Gudvangen moved to convene into executive session. Director Bobbitt seconded the motion, which passed, 7/0.
The Board of Education convened into executive session to discuss personnel [per C.R.S. 24-6-402(4)(f)] [particular matter: personnel matters].
|
|
|
|
| A.6 - |
Pledge of Allegiance - |
| A.8 - |
Modification of the Agenda - |
| |
The Board as a representative body of the District wishes to provide an avenue for any citizen to express his/her interest and concerns for the schools. Accordingly, the public is cordially invited to attend Board meetings. Meetings of the Board are conducted for the purposes of carrying on the business of the Board and are closed to the public only during executive sessions. There are three 20-minute time periods designated for Citizens’ Comments:
1.) During the Preliminaries section of the agenda, as the last item before the start of the Consent Items for the purpose of addressing other concerns that are not Action or Non-Action items on the agenda, 2.) At the beginning of Action for the purpose of addressing action items only, and 3.) At the beginning of Non-Action for the purpose of addressing Non-Action items only. Except when otherwise specified by the Board President, comments by individual citizens in a given time period shall be limited to three minutes with a 30-second warning on the time limit. In order that the Board may fairly and adequately discharge its overall responsibilities, citizens who wish to make requests, representations or proposals to the Board are requested to direct these to the Superintendent, who will deal with them according to the regulations approved by the Board. Ref: Policy BEDH/BEDH-R.
|
Item Action:
None |
| |
|
Motions
|
|
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
|
|
Bob Null |
|
|
|
|
Bob Null, topic: Acknowledgment of District Support Staff. On behalf of the Board of Education, Director Null acknowledged the wonderful service of the following district staff: our wonderful catering staff, maintenance staff, superior audio/video staff, "super" assistant board secretary and "to our bosses, the voters." The Board of Education expressed their appreciation and wished all a very, Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays.
|
|
|
|
Charles Brown |
|
|
|
|
Charles Brown, president of the Downtown Rotary Club, topic: Downtown Rotary Club Check to Queen Palmer. Mr. Brown introduced fellow Rotarian, Tony Sorato. Mr. Sorato spoke regarding their fundraiser in which 50% would stay in their fund and the other 50% would be donated to a worthy cause. Their fundraiser was the Butterflies and Friends Project, which featured local artists. In their research, the Rotary discovered Queen Palmer Elementary School did not have an art program for its students, and so Queen Palmer was selected as the recipient of their fundraiser. The auction proceeds of the Butterflies and Friends Project netted $40,000. The Downtown Rotary presented a check in the amount of $20,000 to Queen Palmer Principal Priscilla Barsotti. Talented area artisans designed the 30 butterflies to raise money for art education, support and supplies for the community’s children. Most of the money raised was split between the Rotary Club’s community service fund and Queen Palmer Elementary School
|
|
|
|
Kristen Downs |
|
|
|
|
Kristen Downs, topic: Buena Vista. Ms. Downs provided an update on their marketing efforts to increase awareness and enrollment for Buena Vista Elementary.
|
|
|
|
Karl Spiecker |
|
|
|
|
Karl Spiecker, topic: Buena Vista and the School Utilization Report. Mr. Spiecker spoke in support of Buena Vista.
|
|
|
|
Michelle Vandepas |
|
|
|
|
Michelle Vandepas, topic: Buena Vista Montessori Program. Ms. Vandepas spoke in support of Buena Vista and the Montessori Program at Buena Vista.
|
|
|
|
Jessica Wheeler |
|
|
|
|
Jessica Wheeler, topic: Buena Vista. Ms. Wheeler spoke of "choice and innovation," federal programs, President-elect Obama's plan and the direction education needs to go. Ms. Wheeler, a Buena Vista parent, supported keeping Buena Vista open and the Montessori program intact at Buena Vista.
|
|
|
|
Heidi Cooper |
|
|
|
|
Heidi Cooper, topic: Taking Buena Vista Elementary off the School Closure List. Ms. Cooper said she was one of a large group of parents concerned about the fate of Buena Vista and urged the board to remove Buena Vista from the "closure list."
|
|
|
|
Wayne Rainford |
|
|
|
|
Wayne Rainford, topic: Potential Closing of Wasson High School. Mr. Rainford spoke in support of keeping Wasson High School open.
|
|
|
|
Michael Fitch |
|
|
|
|
Michael Fitch, Wasson Senior, topic: Wasson High School Plans. Mr. Fitch commented on the excellent opportunities he has received at Wasson High School and spoke further in support of Wasson.
|
|
|
|
Dr. Bishop's Comments |
|
|
|
|
Dr. Bishop commented that, "When you are in a district that has lost 4,000 students in the past ten years, I think it is prudent for the board to take a look at the situation and make sure that we need to either keep going the way we're doing, make some changes, or make other changes and modifications in order to afford the best education possible for all the students in a large school district in Colorado Springs. There are several ways of going about this and we've been accused a lot of times of a top down situation, where the administration and the board came up with a plan and accused of doing it kind of unilaterally and so forth. We wanted to make sure that would not be the case this time and so we developed a multi-phase plan in order that everyone in this community would have some say and at least even a plan before we started looking at making any decisions. Now, that process started back in August and September by hiring a consultant; the consultant spent two months, September and October coming up with just some suggestions. A lot of the way these suggestions have been played in the media and so forth, is kind of like there's been some final decisions made. There have been no final decisions made. All we did as far as the results given to the administration and to the board by the consultants was take that information and go to the second phase, which was the development of a steering committee, in which that steering committee was to come up with a way and kind of a formula that we would utilize going to the community and gaining more information and suggestions and so forth. That committee took the month of November...and came forth with a model that we can use throughout the community to gather this information. During the month of December...we took this month to work with staff. We've been working with principals, ESP (educational support professionals), teachers, central office staff; we've tried to make sure as many people that work for this district has input to that process. Then we're going to take that information and during the month of January, we're going to the community. We're going to have several meetings throughout the community; those meetings will be announced widely by the media and so forth, so everyone will have an opportunity to attend one of the meetings and provide input to the process. the steering committee will take all that information and provide it to the board during the month of February. At that time, the board will have hearing and later on during the month, they will make some type decision of what they think is best for this school district to move forward, to utilize its facilities the best we can and at the same time continue to provide the best education for this community that is possible...I want to assure you that the administration does not have a list of schools to close at this time. "
He asked the community to pay attention to what's happening and guanteed them that they would have an opportunity in January to attend a community meeting in their home area. He hoped they would attend, participate and provide input during one of those meetings.
|
|
|
|
| B.1 - | Adoption of Consent Items - 2 minutes | Item Action: Approved | | | Consent items are placed in the consent portion of the agenda. If board members have any questions concerning these items, they should be directed to the Superintendent or designee prior to the board meeting. If discussion is required on any one of the items, it may be removed from the consent agenda. Those items indicated as being consent items will be adopted by one single motion unless a member of the board requests an item be removed from the consent agenda. | | | | Recommendation To adopt all consent items as designated in the agenda. Consent items: - B.2. Two-Hour Delayed Start, December 9, 2008
- B.3. Revisions to Policies BDFB, JKF and JKG
- B.4. Revision to Policy JKD/JKE-2
- B.5. Revision to Policy DFA/DFAA
| | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
| | Approve | | Jan Tanner | Tom Strand | Passed | Director Tanner moved to adopt all consent items as designated in the agenda. Consent items: - B.2. Two-Hour Delayed Start, December 9, 2008
- B.3. Revisions to Policies BDFB, JKF and JKG
- B.4. Revision to Policy JKD/JKE-2
- B.5. Revision to Policy DFA/DFAA
Director Strand seconded the motion, which passed, 7/0. | |
|
| B.2 - | Two-Hour Delayed Start December 9, 2008 | Item Action: None | | | According to Board policy, the Superintendent or his designee is authorized to close schools for specified emergencies. School District 11 had a two-hour delayed start on Tuesday, December 9, 2008, due to inclement weather.
| | | | Recommendation That the Board of Education approves the two-hour delayed start of School District 11 on December 9, 2008, as submitted by the Administration.
| | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
| | | | | | | The Board of Education approved the two-hour delayed start of School District 11 on December 9, 2008, as submitted by the Administration. | |
|
| B.3 - | Revisions to Policies BDFB-Vocational Advisory Council, JKF- Educational Alternatives for Expelled Students and JKG-Expulsion Prevention | Item Action: None | | | As a result of House Bill 08-1079, C.R.S. 23-8-103(2)(c), any statutory reference to “vocational education” is now “career and technical education”. This verbiage change requires updates to policies JKF- Educational Alternatives for Expelled Students, JKG-Expulsion Prevention Program, and BDFB-Vocational Advisory Committee.
Ref. Pages: 10-14 | | | | Recommendation Review and approved revisions to policies JKF, JKG and BDFB.
| | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
| | | | | | | The Board of Education approved revisions to policies JKF, JKG and BDFB.
| |
|
| B.4 - | Revision to Policy JKD/JKE-2-Discipline of Students with Disabilities | Item Action: None | | | Due to changes in State and Federal Law, IDEA (formerly Individuals with Disabilities Education Act) has been changed to IDEIA (Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act).
Ref. Pages: 15-16 | | | | Recommendation That the Board of Education reviews and approves revisions to policy JKD/JKE-2.
| | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
| | | | | | | The Board of Education approved revisions to policy JKD/JKE-2.
| |
|
| B.5 - | Revision to Policy DFA/DFAA-Statement of Investment | Item Action: None | | | Board Policy DFA-DFAA is the District’s investment policy which governs the management and operations of the District’s investment portfolio.
Ref. Pages: 17-25 | | | | Recommendation Review and approve revisions to Board of Education Policy DFA-DFAA.
| | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
| | | | | | | The Board of Education approved revisions to policy DFA-DFAA.
| |
|
| C.1 - | Citizens' Comments | Item Action: None | | | The Board as a representative body of the District wishes to provide an avenue for any citizen to express his/her interest and concerns for the schools. Accordingly, the public is cordially invited to attend Board meetings. Meetings of the Board are conducted for the purposes of carrying on the business of the Board and are closed to the public only during executive sessions. There are three 20-minute time periods designated for Citizens’ Comments:
1.) During the Preliminaries section of the agenda, as the last item before the start of the Consent Items for the purpose of addressing other concerns that are not Action or Non-Action items on the agenda, 2.) At the beginning of Action for the purpose of addressing action items only, and 3.) At the beginning of Non-Action for the purpose of addressing Non-Action items only. Except when otherwise specified by the Board President, comments by individual citizens in a given time period shall be limited to three minutes with a 30-second warning on the time limit. In order that the Board may fairly and adequately discharge its overall responsibilities, citizens who wish to make requests, representations or proposals to the Board are requested to direct these to the Superintendent, who will deal with them according to the regulations approved by the Board. Ref: Policy BEDH/BEDH-R. | | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
| | Elliot Pullman | | | | | Elliot Pullman, CEO of the Space Foundation, topic: Space Foundation partnership with the district and the utilization of the Emerson facility. Mr. Pullman said he was delighted to be here this evening to speak to the board. He thanked the board and the district's terrific staff for their engagement with the Space Foundation in looking for solutions going forward. Mr. Pullman commented that the Space Foundation has spent the last 23 years developing the expertise in space as a curriculum and have trained more that 30,000 teachers. He said they are very enthused with their conversations with the district about establishing and delivering directly to teachers and students in an in-school environment.
| | | Wes Montoya | | | | | Wes Montoya, topic: Support to Keep Emerson open. Mr. Montoya commented that he was here representing some of the students and parents of the Emerson community. He said parents appreciate the fact that their children can stay at school and be safe. He asked the board to keep Emerson open.
| | | Vicky Chiles | | | | Vicky Chiles, teacher at Emerson, topic: Support to Keep Emerson Open! Ms. Chiles spoke regarding the families that live in the Emerson area and attend the school. She said the kids mean a lot to her and they need a community school. | | | Betsy Mitchell | | | | | Betsy Mitchell, parent of a 7th grader at Emerson, topic: Support to Keep Emerson Open! Ms. Mitchell commented on the attendance during their last concert and said the parents were able to attend because they could walk to the school. She asked the board to keep the students at Emerson.
| | | Josh Propp | | | | | Josh Propp, topic: In Support of Emerson Staying Open.
| | | Precious Broadnax | | | | | Precious Broadnax, principal of Roosevelt-Edison, acting principal of Emerson-Edison, topic: In Support of Keeping Emerson Open. She said she was here tonight as Precious Broadnax, community leader. She was here for her "babies" tonight and said that they deserve a community school that is excellent.
| | | Pamela Stokes | | | | | Pamela Stokes, mother and grandmother of students at Roosevelt and Emerson schools, topic: Support of Keeping Emerson Open. She said it was very important to them to have a school in the area so kids and parents could participate in before/after school programs.
| | | Howard Johnson | | | | | Howard Johnson, counselor at Emerson, topic: Don't Close the School! Mr. Johnson commented that Emerson really is a community school; parents look to them for help, to answer questions, provide a safe place for their kids to stay. He said they really need the school to stay open.
| | | Howard Johnson | | | | | Howard Johnson, counselor of Emerson, topic: Don't Close Emerson. really is a community school; parents look to them for help, to answer questions, provide a safe place to stay. Really need the school to stay open.
| | | Margarita Escobar | | | | | Margarita Escobar, Emerson parent, topic: To Keep Emerson Open. Ms. Escobar had an Emerson teacher present to translate her comments. The teacher said Ms. Escobar said the students and parents all walk to school. Her family has lived in the community for seven years; she asked the board to reconsidering closing the school; relocating the children to another school would be very traumatic for them. Please do not shut the door on her children.
| | | Heather Ulrich | | | | | Heather Ulrich with student Karina Vega, topic: Student has a Poem to Share. Ms. Ulrich, teacher at Emerson, read a poem Karina wrote about her school. Karina was present at the podium, but was too shy to speak. She asked the board to keep Emerson open.
| |
|
| C.2 - | Contract Awards | Item Action: None | | | The purpose of this agenda item is to have a standing agenda item in place on a continual weekly basis. This agenda item will be used for capital investment and other contracts. Timing of contract actions is such that it will require continual expeditious board approval of contracts. Some weeks will not have any contracts, while many other weeks will have lists of proposed contracts for board approval. Each week a reference will be submitted listing any proposed contract actions with appropriate information. Solicitation documents and information about each procurement action are available for examination and review in the Business Office. | | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
| | There were no contract awards | | | | | |
|
| C.3 - | Budget Transfers, Appropriations and FTE Approvals | Item Action: None | | | Board Policy DBJ-Budget Transfers requires the board to approve budget transfers for any fund when: (1) the aggregate amount to be transferred to support any line item, single issue or purpose exceeds $100,000; or (2) the accumulation of budget transfer needs is expected to significantly impact the annual budget; or (3) transfers from one major function category to another major function category exceed $20,000 or (4) strategic plan resource allocations need to be re prioritized. Board approval is also required for general fund contingency transfers over $50,000, or in the event the contingency reserve will be reduced by more than 25% for the fiscal year. Board policy DBJ also states that all capital reserve fund project budget appropriations shall be approved by the board; therefore, any transfer of unspent, or unencumbered monies to other projects, shall be approved by the board. CRS-32-109 (1) (f) (l) states the Board of Education has the specific duty to employ all personnel...and to fix and order paid their compensations. Since the budgetary impact of adding a new position must first be considered prior to the hiring process, Board approval is required when there is a proposed change to the authorized staffing level. | | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
| | There were no budget transfers, appropriations or FTE approvals | | | | | |
|
| C.4 - | Personnel Recommendations-2 minutes | Item Action: Approved | | | The Division of Human Resources provides for consideration a list of Personnel Recommendations. The Board may remove an individual personnel recommendation for separate consideration by amending the original motion to approve the recommendation list. Presenters: Dr. Thurman/Mr. Schenkel
Ref. Page: 26-34 | | | | Recommendation That the Board of Education approves the December 17, 2008, Personnel Recommendations, as submitted by the Administration.
| | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
| | Approve | | Tom Strand | Bob Null | Passed | Mr. Schenkel advised the board that within the personnel recommendations submitted were lists of employees that were eligible for the retirement program. The employees have ninety days from today to confirm their wish to retire with the Human Resources Department.
Director Bobbitt inquired about the early retirement incentive program and asked what the incentive was. Mr. Schenkel said it was not an incentive to retire; it was an incentive to not retire until an employee got to the top 4, 20 or 40 within their employee group.
Director Strand moved that the Board of Education approves the December 17, 2008, Personnel Recommendations, as amended, and as submitted by the Administration. Director Null seconded the motion, which passed, 7/0.
The Board of Education approved the December 17, 2008, personnel recommendations and addendum.
| |
|
| C.5 - | Emerson-Edison Restructure - 30 minutes | Item Action: None | | | Under the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB), Emerson Edison Charter Academy must be restructured as a consequence of not making Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) for the last six years. A restructuring team was established to meet the requirements for NCLB which requires community input, Emerson Edison staff input as well as District 11 staff input. After studying the options (reopen as a charter, reopen as a District 11 focus school, or close the school) and considering the community input the restructuring team is recommending keeping Emerson as a District 11 focus school.Presenters: Dr. Bishop/Mr. Poore/Mr. Griego/Ms. ClaybaughRef. Pages: 35-76 | | | | Recommendation The Administration recommends that the Emerson Edison Charter Academy be restructured, as required by NCLB, for the 2009-10 school years to reopen as a District 11 school continuing to serve students in grades 6-8, starting with grade 6 in 2009-10, adding a grade each year for the next 2 years. The administration is directed to hire a principal and administrative assistant to facilitate the opening of the new District 11 school.
| | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
| | Approve | | Tom Strand | Bob Null | Passed | Dr. Bishop provided a short introduction to the topic. Personnel were available to answer questions the board had. Executive Director of Grants Ms. Kandy Claybaugh gave a brief review and said that tonight the board needed to decide what was going to be reported to the state on January 7 about the restructuring of Emerson. Deputy Superintendent of Educational Support Services Mr. Mike Poore was also present to respond to board member concerns and questions.
Director Strand moved the the Board of Education approves that the Emerson-Edison Charter Academy be restructured, as required by NCLB, for the 2009-10 school year to reopen as a District 11 school. The administration is directed to hire a principal and administrative assistant to facilitate the opening of the new District 11 school. Director Null seconded the motion.
Mr. Poore recommended the board include in their motion the statement, "With such funds approved from the FY08-09 General Fund Contingency Fund."
Director Strand withdrew his motion and restated:
Director Strand moved that the Board of Education approves that the Emerson-Edison Charter Academy be restructured, as required by NCLB, for the 2009-10 school year to reopen as a District 11 school. The administration is directed to hire a principal and administrative assistant to facilitate the opening of the new District 11 school with such funds approved from the FY08-09 General Fund Contingency Fund. Director Null seconded the motion.
Discussion, questions and answers followed.
Director Strand commented that although he would support this motion, he would work hard to protect the other middle schools' interest. Director Tanner said she would also support this motion and that the Emerson neighborhood needed a neighborhood school. President Hasling commented that she felt they had a great opportunity with this and creating partnerships with the community and the Space Foundation.
The motion, that the Board of Education approves that the Emerson-Edison Academy be restructured, as required by NCLB, for the 2009-10 school year to reopen as a District 11 school. Further moved that the Board of Education directs administration to hire a principal and administrative assistant to facilitate the opening of the new Distridct 11 school with such funds approved from the FY08-09 General Fund Contingency Fund, passed, 7/0.
| |
|
| C.6 - | Administration Proposal for the Emerson Facility - 30 minutes | Item Action: Approved | | | The Board of Education has been briefed throughout the Fall regarding the status of Emerson Edison. As the Board of Education considers a course of action to respond to Emerson Edison’s inability to make AYP the Administrative Team began to explore options and opportunities if the District took this site back and made it a District school. Attached you will find a recommendation for action to bring Emerson back as a District school. Presenters: Dr. Bishop/Dr. Thurman/Mr. Gustafson/Mr. Poore
Ref. Pages: 77-123 | | | | Recommendation Starting with the 2009-2010 school year a district run magnet school with an aeronautical focus, with support from community partners, including but not limited to, The Space Foundation, Economic Development Corporation, The Colorado Springs Chamber of Commerce, and Peterson Air Force Base, will open in the former Emerson-Edison school facility.
Materials of Support
- Personnel Request (Dr. Thurman)
- Model of Delivery (David Malone)
A. 6th Grade
B. Aero Science
C. RtI/PBS
- School of Innovation Components
- Partnership with National Space Foundation (Mary Ley)
- Budget Transfer (Glenn Gustafson)
- Middle School Boundary Map
| | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
| | Approve | | Jan Tanner | Charles Bobbitt | Passed | Mr. Poore presented a PowerPoint presentation and spoke to each slide.
For the 2009-10 school year, administration proposed only open to 6th grade in the Emerson facility to create a culture. Current 6th and 7th graders at Emerson would attend Irving Middle School. Those students from Emerson attending Russell will continue to receive transportation (for the next two years).
Dr. Bishop spoke regarding the importance of using the model of opening to only one grade (6th grade) the first year a school reopens to change the culture. The research is clear and the evidence from across the United States support opening to only the youngest grade.
Discussion, questions and answers followed. Board members had concerns about the current 6th and 7th graders at Emerson. Mr. Poore commented that he wasn't sure that administration could open the new school to all three grades and do it well and with fidelity. He assured the board that the principal at Irving, Judy Hawkins, is ready to receive them and can work wonders.
President Hasling asked for a motion.
Director Tanner moved that the Board of Education Starting with the 2009-2010 school year a district run magnet school with an aeronautical focus, with support from community partners, including but not limited to, The Space Foundation, Economic Development Corporation, The Colorado Springs Chamber of Commerce, and Peterson Air Force Base, to open in the former Emerson-Edison school facility. Director Bobbitt seconded the motion.
Discussion continued.
Director Tanner commented that she felt for the future 7th and 8th graders next year, who won't be able to be in this location, but we have to promise all students that no matter where we educate them, they will have an excellent education. She said that all 7th graders would be able to take advantage of programming that the Space Foundation would provide. Opportunities would be available at every middle school.
Director Strand said he was not convinced that this school had to be a magnet school, or that it couldn't be opened to 6th, 7th and 8th graders in a traditional school. He was concerned about that student who did not want to go to Irving and would cross the border to another school district. He requested proof that this program would be able to provide a curriculum that would make a difference and would increase test scores. Mr. Poore responded that administration and staff had some real work to do to open this school and that was why they recommended only opening to 6th grade. He also cited what's happening at Galileo.
Director Null might approve this tonight if a decision wasn't made about what to do with the current 6th and 7th graders.
Director Mann commented that she would support reopening to 6th grade only. She asked Mr. Poore to confirm that all current 6th and 7th graders from Emerson would attend Irving next year. He replied yes, administration felt it would be better to keep them as a group together and that Irving had the room.
Director Gudvangen said no matter how exciting the proposals may be, the rubber hits the road with the teacher in the classroom. He felt it was clear that cross cultural relationships should be paid attention to; cross culture partnerships was important. He said there was still a lot of lack of specificity, and a lot of work left to be done, "Frankly, I don't think I would be supportive of this if there weren't a Space Foundation partnership." He commented on his concern about resources for all of the district's schools.
Director Bobbitt clarified that they were no longer looking at a school of innovation. Dr. Bishop responded that was correct. He said their recommendation would not to be to use the Innovative Schools Act; there are too many questions about it; about the legality of using it in this situation. However, we could use some of the concepts.
Director Bobbitt commented that he felt this all worked into and was part of the Utilization Study. He said he was totally in support of this because of the involvement of the Space Foundation.
The motion, that the Board of Education Starting with the 2009-2010 school year a district run magnet school with an aeronautical focus, with support from community partners, including but not limited to, The Space Foundation, Economic Development Corporation, The Colorado Springs Chamber of Commerce, and Peterson Air Force Base, will open in the former Emerson-Edison school facility, passed, 7/0.
Dr. Bishop clarified with the board that what they wanted administration to do was to investigate the options, research the availability of curriculum and communicate to them about their findings and plans to open only to 6th grade next year. | | | Break at 9:30 p.m. | | | | | |
|
| C.7 - | FY2008-2009 Mid-Year Budget Modifications - 30 minutes | Item Action: Approved | | | Each year the District prepares a mid-year budget document. The mid-year budget revision reflects the final certified pupil count, property tax revenues based on the county’s final assessed valuations, the audited beginning fund balances, and other revenue and expenditure adjustments as needed. Presenters: Mr. Gustafson/Ms. Kluck
Ref. Pages: 124-126 | | | | Recommendation That the Board of Education approves the revised FY08/09 Mid-Year Budget Update modifications and revised appropriation levels as presented by the administration.
| | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
| | Approve | | Tom Strand | Charles Bobbitt | Passed | Executive Director Rebecca Kluck clarified that the Contingency Fund Balance was currently $1.7 million and said that the contingency balance is based on an estimate of revenues.
Director Strand moved that the Board of Education approves the revised FY08/09 Mid-Year Budget Update modifications and revised appropriation levels as presented by the administration. Director Bobbitt seconded the motion.
Discussion, questions and answers followed.
The motion, that the Board of Education approves the revised FY08/09 Mid-Year Budget Update modifications and revised appropriation levels as presented by the administration, passed, 7/0.
| |
|
| D.1 - | Citizens' Comments | Item Action: None | | | The Board as a representative body of the District wishes to provide an avenue for any citizen to express his/her interest and concerns for the schools. Accordingly, the public is cordially invited to attend Board meetings. Meetings of the Board are conducted for the purposes of carrying on the business of the Board and are closed to the public only during executive sessions. There are three 20-minute time periods designated for Citizens’ Comments:
1.) During the Preliminaries section of the agenda, as the last item before the start of the Consent Items for the purpose of addressing other concerns that are not Action or Non-Action items on the agenda, 2.) At the beginning of Action for the purpose of addressing action items only, and 3.) At the beginning of Non-Action for the purpose of addressing Non-Action items only. Except when otherwise specified by the Board President, comments by individual citizens in a given time period shall be limited to three minutes with a 30-second warning on the time limit. In order that the Board may fairly and adequately discharge its overall responsibilities, citizens who wish to make requests, representations or proposals to the Board are requested to direct these to the Superintendent, who will deal with them according to the regulations approved by the Board. Ref: Policy BEDH/BEDH-R. | | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
| | There were no citizens' comments pertaining to non-action items | | | | | |
|
| D.2 - | Permit Window Extension | Item Action: Approved | | | This is a proposal to temporarily waive the required February 1 choice application acceptance deadline and extend it to April 1 to accommodate potential opportunities resulting from the reutilization plan. Presenter: Mr. Poore
Ref. Pages: 127-134 | | | | Recommendation The recommendation is that, in accordance with Board policy BG, School Board of Education Policy Process, the BOE elect to waive the requirement of ending the Choice permit application acceptance window on February 1, 2009, and extend the application acceptance window to April 1, 2009, in order to accommodate parents that may want to utilize the choice program as a result of the reutilization plan/study.
| | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
| | Approve | move to action | Tom Strand | Charles Bobbitt | Passed | Dr. Bishop introduced the topic and turned over the presentation to Mr. Poore.
Mr. Poore explained the permit window extension, and clarified that this was not a policy change.
Director Strand moved to move this item to action to vote on it tonight. Director Bobbitt seconded the motion, which passed, 7/0.
| | | Approve | Temporarily extending the permit window | Bob Null | Charles Bobbitt | Passed | Director Null moved that, in accordance with Board policy BG, School Board of Education Policy Process, the Board of Education elect to waive the requirement of ending the Choice permit application acceptance window on February 1, 2009, and extend the application acceptance window to April 1, 2009, in order to accommodate parents that may want to utilize the choice program as a result of the reutilization plan/study. Director Bobbitt seconded the motion, which passed, 7/0.
In accordance with Board of Education policy BG – School Board of Education Policy Process, the Board of Education elected to waive the requirement ending the Choice Permit application acceptance window on February 1, 2009, and extend the application acceptance window to April 1, 2009, in order to accommodate parents who may want to utilize the choice program as a result of the reutilization plan/study.
Administration was directed to communicate this to the internal and external community immediately.
| |
|
| E. | REPORTS AND DISCUSSION ITEMS |
| E.1 - | Superintendent/Administrative Reports | Item Action: None | | | This agenda item is reserved for presentations, status reports, and announcements to the Board by the Superintendent and the Administration that have not been provided as information only in the Board packets. Unless otherwise directed by the Board, annual and standing reports not requiring Board action are to be provided in hard copy for information only in the Board Director packets. The superintendent has the opportunity to report on a range of topics during this time.
| | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
|
|
| E.2 - | Phase II of Draft Plan of the Utilization Study - 15 minutes | Item Action: None | | | An update will be provided to the board.Presenter: Mr. Poore | | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
| | An update was presented | | | | Mr. Poore presented an update on the steering committee work and the meetings that have occurred. He said that perhaps they might be able to deliver a report to the board by this Friday (hard copy and electronic).
Director Null commented, "I am most happy with the participation of all the staff and citizen volunteers with regard to the reutilization of D-11 schools and resources, but now it is time for the leadership (Board of Education and Superintendent) to give some course correction. It is great that we have been looking at all possible options and exploring some of the options in-depth, but I believe it is time to start reducing the scope and field of study with direction from the Board. The Gazette article is not the D-11 answer or even part of the answer!! Proposed Board Actions
1. Approve Emerson proposal/recommendations – almost done.
2. Explore the option of the utilization of “Small Schools” as mentioned in the Contractor’s report.
3. Drop any effort to address closing and selling the administration building and moving assets to Wasson.
4. Drop combining Night Schools.
5. Delay any more effort to establish K-8’s until a future phase.
6. Look at down sizing crowded schools to under utilized schools.
7. Take Buena Vista off the closure list.
8. Take serious look at moving Bijou to Longfellow.
9. Delay or drop putting any non-D-11 students or people into any D-11 building."
He also commented that the Board of Education needs to review substance of the recommendations in early January and give course correction superintendent. Only twenty-six working days to accomplish all this in before February 4, 2009.
| |
|
| E.3 - | Other Discussion Items | Item Action: None | | | Board members will have the opportunity for open discussion. | | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
| | | | | | Director Tanner advised that the legislative session was getting ready to start; she wanted to work with Mr. Gustafson to develop the legislative platform.
Director Null stated that the nepotism policy needs to be updated, and four board members gave head nods to ask the policy subcommittee to proceed with updating (Bobbitt, Mann, Null, Strand, Tanner).
Director Bobbitt, along with Directors Null and Strand enjoyed attending the Palmer Night School annual holiday celebration.
Director Null, who is on the charter school subcommittee, and Director Strand attended the Life Skills Center’s graduation ceremony. It was heartwarming to see the challenges the students have overcome.
Director Tanner invited everyone to meet with two legislators and will set up another meeting in January.
| |
|
| E.4 - | Board Subcommittee Reports | Item Action: None | | | Board members will have the opportunity to report on their respective subcommittees. | | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
| | | | | | Director Gudvangen advised that the audit committee had a good meeting and will meet again in January. The committee reviewed the McGladry-Pullen audit and the responses provided by adminstration.
President Hasling commented on the fact that the Project Now committees need board representation and asked other board members to let her know which one they would like to attend, and also advised that there would be a board retreat on January 7 from 6:00 to 10:00 p.m. at Tesla, the topic would be board norms.
| |
|
| F.1 - | New Agenda Items from Board Discussion | Item Action: None | | | Board members have the opportunity to bring forward items for a future agenda. | | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
|
|
| F.2 - | School Utilization | Item Action: None | | | - Phase I (November): draft plan to steering committee & administration develops recommendation
- Phase II (December): draft plan/recommendation goes to staff
- Phase III (January): draft plan/recommendation goes to community
- Phase IV (February): draft plan/recommendation to the Board of Education: hearing, non-action, action
The Board of Education will be provided updates under Reports & Discussion Items November-January. Possible work session on the Draft Plan February 4, followed by a public hearing, non-action on February 11 and action February 25, 2009. | | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
|
|
| F.4 - | Magnet School Concepts - TBD | Item Action: None | | | Magnet School Concepts will be presented sometime after the November elections. | | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
|
|
| G. | FUTURE WORK SESSIONS LIST REVIEW AND DISCUSSION FOR ADDITIONAL WORK SESSIONS ITEMS |
| G.1 - | January 21, 2008, Work Session | Item Action: None | | | - Board Input for FY 09/10 Budget Development
- Superintendent Search Work
| | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
|
|
| H. | ADMINISTRATION’S TASK LIST REVIEW AND UPDATE |
| H.1 - | Task List Review 2 minutes | Item Action: None | | | The Administration Task List consists of requests from Board directors for information/analysis within specified time lines and will be reviewed and updated during this time. These requests should primarily be tasking for information/analysis and should not be for the scheduling of future agenda items. A recommendation should be included with the task for the purpose indicating as whether or not it needs to be included on the Calendar. Items may be added to the task list with the agreement of four Board Directors as indicated by head nods. Ref. Pages: 135-140 | | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
|
|
| I. | CALENDAR REVIEW AND UPDATE |
| I.1 - | Calendar Review 2 minutes | Item Action: None | | | The Board's Calendar will be reviewed and updated during this time. Items may be added to the Calendar with the agreement of four Board Directors as indicated by head nods. To look at district events and to access the District Calendar go to our home page at www.d11.org. On the left hand side of the screen, click on Calendars, then D11 Calendars. In the center of that page, in the drop down box, select District Calendar.
Upcoming meetings/events: - December 17, 2008, regular meeting
- January 14, 2009, regular meeting
- January 21, 2009, work session
- January 28, 2009, regular meeting
Ref. Pages: 141-151 | | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
|
|
| | | Item Action: None | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
| | adjournment | | | | The Board of Education adjourned at 10:30 p.m.
Julie Rene Stevens, secretary to the Board of Education | |
|
|