| |
Roll CallCharles Bobbitt, Director John Gudvangen, Treasurer Tami Hasling, President Sandra Mann, Director Bob Null, Director
Tom Strand, Vice-PresidentJanet Tanner, Secretary
|
Item Action:
None |
| |
|
Motions
|
|
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present at Roll Call were President Tami Hasling, Vice-President Tom Strand, Secretary Janet Tanner, Treasurer John Gudvangen, and Directors Charlie Bobbitt and Bob Null. Director Sandra Mann arrived during executive session. Also present: Superintendent Dr. Terry Bishop, Deputy Superintendent of Personnel Support Services Dr. Mary Thurman, Chief Financial Officer/Deputy Superintendent Mr. Glenn Gustafson, Deputy Superintendent of Educational Support Services Mr. Michael Poore, Human Resources Division Head Mr. David Schenkel, Communications and Community Relations Director Ms. Elaine Naleski, and Secretary to the Board of Education Julie Rene Stevens.
|
|
|
|
| A.3 - |
Moment of Silence - |
| A.4 - |
Adoption of the Agenda - |
| |
The agenda presented to the Board in the Board’s packet will be considered for approval at this time. A Board Director or the Superintendent may request to, add, delete or table an item, i.e., an emergency school closure approval action that is in accordance with Policies. Board Directors shall make a separate motion for each item they seek to have added, deleted, or tabled. Reordering items on the agenda requires approval of a single motion with a majority vote of the quorum present.
A Board Director’s request that a non-emergency item be added to the agenda, as action shall require for approval a two-thirds majority of the entire Board. The Director making the request shall provide a copy of the motion and materials to all Board Directors. A Board Director’s request that a non-emergency item be added to the agenda, as non-action shall require for approval a majority of the quorum present. The Director making the request shall provide a copy of the motion and materials to all Board Directors.
|
Item Action:
Approved |
| |
Recommendation That the Board of Education adopts the agenda, as presented (and/or amended).
|
|
| |
|
Motions
|
|
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
|
| Approve |
|
Tom Strand |
Bob Null |
Passed |
Director Strand moved that the Board of Education adopts the agenda, as amended, by removing action item C2-Contract Awards, as there were no contract awards and adding discussion on schools of innovation to legal advice under executive session topics. Director Null seconded the motion, which passed, 6/0. Director Mann was absent.
|
|
|
|
| A.5 - |
Executive Session - |
| |
The Board of Education may, under state statutes, go into Executive Session to discuss matters pertaining to:
1) property transactions [per C.R.S. 24-6-402(4)(a)] [particular matter:]; 2) X legal advice [per C.R.S. 24-6-402(4)(b)] [particular matter: Doug Bruce Complaint]; 3) security arrangements or investigations [per C.R.S. 24-6-402(4)(d)] [particular matter:]; 4) negotiations [per C.R.S. 24-6-402(4)(e)] [particular matter: ]5) personnel [per C.R.S. 24-6-402(4)(f)] [particular matter: ];6) individual student(s) [per C.R.S. 24-6-402(4)(h)] [particular matter: ]; 7) documents that may not be disclosed under the Colorado Open Records Act [per C.R.S. 24-6-402(4)(g)] [particular matter ]; and 8) matters required to be kept confidential by state or federal law [per C.R.S. 24-6-402(4)(c)][specific legal citation:].
Executive Session from approximately 5:30 p.m.-6:30 p.m. The Board of Education will reconvene into regular session at approximately 6:30 p.m.
|
Item Action:
Approved |
| |
Recommendation To convene into Executive Session. The Board of Education may, under state statutes, go into Executive Session to discuss matters pertaining to property transactions, legal advice, security arrangements or investigations, negotiations, personnel, individual students, documents that may not be disclosed under the Colorado Open Records Act and matters required to be kept confidential by law. |
|
| |
|
Motions
|
|
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
|
| Approve |
|
Tom Strand |
Bob Null |
Passed |
|
Director Strand moved to convene into Executive Session to discuss legal advice [per C.R.S. 24-6-402(4)(b)] [particular matter: Doug Bruce Complaint and Schools of Innovation Act (law)]. Director Null seconded the motion, which passed, 6/0. Director Mann was absent.
|
|
|
|
| A.6 - |
Pledge of Allegiance - |
| A.8 - |
Modification of the Agenda - |
| |
The Board as a representative body of the District wishes to provide an avenue for any citizen to express his/her interest and concerns for the schools. Accordingly, the public is cordially invited to attend Board meetings. Meetings of the Board are conducted for the purposes of carrying on the business of the Board and are closed to the public only during executive sessions. There are three 20-minute time periods designated for Citizens’ Comments:
1.) During the Preliminaries section of the agenda, as the last item before the start of the Consent Items for the purpose of addressing other concerns that are not Action or Non-Action items on the agenda, 2.) At the beginning of Action for the purpose of addressing action items only, and 3.) At the beginning of Non-Action for the purpose of addressing Non-Action items only. Except when otherwise specified by the Board President, comments by individual citizens in a given time period shall be limited to three minutes with a 30-second warning on the time limit. In order that the Board may fairly and adequately discharge its overall responsibilities, citizens who wish to make requests, representations or proposals to the Board are requested to direct these to the Superintendent, who will deal with them according to the regulations approved by the Board. Ref: Policy BEDH/BEDH-R.
|
Item Action:
None |
| |
|
Motions
|
|
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
|
|
Glenn Gustafson |
|
|
|
Glenn Gustafson, deputy superintendent and CFO, topic: D-11 Energy Award. Mr. Gustafson showed a short video showcasing the district's Photovoltic project. Mr. Gustafson recognized Energy Manager Mr. Thomas Fernandez.
The D-11 Facilities, Operations and Transportation Center (FOTC) is using energy conserving photovoltaic panels to generate electrical energy in order to reduce the amount of electricity D-11 purchases from Colorado Springs Utilities. District 11 has a long history of energy conservation efforts starting in 1999, when the district first officially began its self-funded, multi-phased program. Since then, D- 11 has become a local energy conservation leader and has received various awards and recognitions for its energy conservation efforts. Thomas Fernandez, D-11 energy manager, is nationally recognized and frequently invited to speak at conferences. On Oct. 28, the D-11 Facilities, Operations and Transportation Center (FOTC) held a ribbon-cutting ceremony to officially begin use of a new energy conservation pilot project – the photovoltaic (PV) project, a solar-energy pilot project that uses an array of interconnected PV panels to generate significant amounts of electrical energy, which is fed into the power system of the building and reduces the amount of electricity that must be purchased from Colorado Springs Utilities (CSU). During low-use periods, excess energy can be sold back to CSU. The expected useful life of the system is 40-50 years, and the break-even point is estimated at 15 to 20 years. The photovoltaic project is really a shared-funding partnership with Colorado Springs Utilities ($92,000 in energy rebates) and the Governor’s Energy Office (a $25,000 grant). Thanks to the partnership, the school district’s costs were reduced by 50 percent. "The Governor’s Energy Office applauds the work of School District 11 to advance clean, modern energy by installing a solar electric system," says Mona Newton, central regional representative of the Governor’s Energy Office.
|
|
|
|
Lyman Kaiser |
|
|
|
|
Lyman Kaiser, topic: School Accountability Reports (SARs). Mr. Kaiser congratulated the board, the administration, schools and staff on the outstanding results in their School Accountability Reports and longitudinal growth. Mr. Kaiser commented further on the improvement in the SARs and other positive results in District 11.
|
|
|
|
John Spengler |
|
|
|
|
John Spengler, topic: Montessori Program at Buena Vista Elementary. Mr. Spengler stated that he was a science teacher at District 20 and had the option to enroll his children in District 20, but they chose Buena Vista because it "is that good." Mr. Spengler spoke in favor of keeping Buena Vista open.
|
|
|
|
Grant Spengler |
|
|
|
|
Grant Spengler, 4th grader at Buena Vista, topic: Montessori Program at Buena Vista Elementary. Grant said Buena Vista should stay open because it is a great school; he listed more reasons why Buena Vista should stay open.
|
|
|
|
Kristen Downs |
|
|
|
|
Kristen Downs, topic: Montessori Program at Buena Vista. Ms. Downs presented another positive as to why the Montessori program should stay at Buena Vista. Ms. Downs delivered packets of comments and information to each board member. She implored the board to take the closure of Buena Vista off the agenda now.
|
|
|
|
President Hasling's comments |
|
|
|
7:00 p.m.: President Hasling closed citizens' comments for now and moved to the Public Hearing on the Emerson-Edison Restructure.
She reminded those attending from Buena Vista that there is no school on "the list for closure" at this time. The board is researching the utilization of schools; no decision had been made by the board.
|
|
|
|
Jessica Wheeler |
|
|
|
|
Jessica Wheeler, topic: Montessori Program at Buena Vista Elementary. Ms. Wheeler spoke in favor of the Montessori program at Buena Vista, the advantages of a smaller school and the location of the school. She commented that a public Montessori program is a great asset.
|
|
|
|
Maida Scott |
|
|
|
|
Maida Scott, topic: Montessori Program at Buena Vista. Ms. Scott spoke highly of the Montessori program at Buena Vista. Said she was losing sleep over the possibility of the school closing. Despite what the board has said, she said that is not the public perception, and asked the board to remove them from the list of schools to be considered for closure.
|
|
|
|
Alberto Hernandez |
|
|
|
|
Alberto Hernandez, topic: Montessori Program at Buena Vista. Mr. Hernandez commented on his concern with Buena Vista closing. He then commented that the report from the Utilization Study did not take into account the fact that there was a Montessori program at Buena Vista.
|
|
|
|
| B.1 - | 7:00 p.m. Public Hearing: Emerson-Edison Restructure | Item Action: None | | | This time is set aside for community input regarding the Emerson-Edison Restructure. | | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
| | Chandra Lovette | | | | Chandra Lovette, topic: Emerson-Edison Restructure. Ms. Lovette said that she has her children enrolled at Russell by choice. With regard to the Emerson-Edison decision, Ms. Lovette asked the board to take into consideration the effect it may have on the district as a whole. She was okay with reopening Emerson as long as it didn't take away programs and benefits from Russell. | | | Mark Lyons | | | | | Mark Lyons, parent and BAAC chair at Russell Middle School, topic: Emerson-Edison Restructure. Mr. Lyons thanked the board and administration for considering all options and listening to the community.
| | | Public Hearing Closed at 7:10 p.m. | | | | | There were no other comments pertaining to the Emerson-Edison Restructure. President Hasling returned to Citizens' Comments.
| |
|
| B.2 - | Emerson-Edison Restructure - 30 minutes | Item Action: None | | | Under the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB), Emerson Edison Charter Academy must be restructured as a consequence of not making Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) for the last six years. A restructuring team was established to meet the requirements for NCLB which requires community input, Emerson Edison staff input as well as District 11 staff input. After studying the options (reopen as a charter, reopen as a District 11 focus school, or close the school) and considering the community input the restructuring team is recommending to keep Emerson as a District 11 focus school.Presenters: Dr. Bishop/Mr. Poore/Mr. Griego/Ms. ClaybaughRef. Pages: 64-105
| | | | Recommendation The Administration recommends that the Emerson Edison Charter Academy be restructured, as required by NCLB, for the 2009-10 school years to reopen as a District 11 school continuing to serve students in grades 6-8, starting with grade 6 in 2009-10, adding a grade each year for the next 2 years. The administration is directed to hire a principal and administrative assistant to facilitate the opening of the new District 11 school.
| | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
| | | | | | Dr. Bishop introduced the topic and turned over the presentation to Charter School Liaison Mr. John Griego. Mr. Griego reviewed a presentation with the board.
Mr. Gustafson then presented the Emerson School Reutilization Analysis, General Fund Impact. Questions and answers followed.
| |
|
| C.1 - | Adoption of Consent Items - 2 minutes | Item Action: Approved | | | Consent items are placed in the consent portion of the agenda. If board members have any questions concerning these items, they should be directed to the Superintendent or designee prior to the board meeting. If discussion is required on any one of the items, it may be removed from the consent agenda. Those items indicated as being consent items will be adopted by one single motion unless a member of the board requests an item be removed from the consent agenda. | | | | Recommendation To adopt all consent items as designated in the agenda. Consent items: - B.2. Mill Levy Certification
- B.3. 403 (b) Tax Sheltered Annuity Plan
- B.4. Approval of Board Meeting Minutes
- B.5. Two-hour Delayed Start, December 1, 2008
| | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
| | Approve | | Jan Tanner | Tom Strand | Passed | Director Tanner moved to adopt all consent items as designated in the agenda. Director Strand seconded the motion, which passed, 7/0.
Consent items: - B.2. Mill Levy Certification
- B.3. 403 (b) Tax Sheltered Annuity Plan
- B.4. Approval of Board Meeting Minutes
- B.5. Two-hour Delayed Start, December 1, 2008
| |
|
| C.2 - | Mill Levy Certification | Item Action: None | | | By statute, the mill levy rates must be certified by December 15 of each year. The Board receives the calculated mill levy rates and resolution for approval.Ref. Pages: 15-19 | | | | Recommendation That the Board of Education approves the District 11 mill levy as shown in the attached resolution.
| | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
| | | | | | | The Board of Education approved the District 11 mill levy as shown in the attached resolution.
| |
|
| C.3 - | 403 (b) Tax Sheltered Annuity Plan Document | Item Action: None | | | In late 2007 the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) issued new regulations that required sweeping changes to section 403(b) of the Internal Revenue Code. After years of random implementations and variable compliance measures, the IRS decided to promulgate new regulations to standardize 403(b) compliance across the education and health care industries. The new rules place the fiduciary responsibility of plan administration squarely on the District's shoulders by requiring the adoption of a plan document, election of plan provisions, and compliance with various IRS regulations including Maximum Exclusion Allowance (MEA) calculations, loan and hardship withdrawal provisions, and timely remittance to vendors.Ref. Pages: 20-43 | | | | Recommendation That the Board of Education approves the Adoption Agreement for the 403(b) Plan Document for Public Education Organizations and the 403(b) Plan document as submitted by the administration and Voluntary Retirement Plan Employee Committee.
| | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
| | | | | | | The Board of Education approved the Adoption Agreement for the 403(b) Plan Document for Public Education Organizations and the 403(b) Plan document, as submitted by the administration, and Voluntary Retirement Plan Employee Committee.
| |
|
| C.4 - | Approval of Board Meeting Minutes | Item Action: None | | | Ref. Pages: Under Separate Cover | | | | Recommendation That the Board of Education approves the minutes of the November 12, 2008, regular board meeting. All minutes are available on the district website after approval by the Board of Education.
| | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
| | | | | | | The Board of Education approved the minutes of the November 12, 2008, regular board meeting.
| |
|
| C.5 - | Two-Hour Delayed Start December 1, 2008 | Item Action: None | | | According to Board policy, the Superintendent or his designee is authorized to close schools for specified emergencies. School District 11 had a two-hour delayed start on December 1, 2008, due to inclement weather.
| | | | Recommendation That the Board of Education approves the two-hour delayed start of School District 11 on December 1, 2008, as submitted by the Administration.
| | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
| | | | | | | The Board of Education approved the two-hour delayed start of School District 11 on December 1, 2008, as submitted by the Administration. | |
|
| D.1 - | Citizens' Comments | Item Action: None | | | The Board as a representative body of the District wishes to provide an avenue for any citizen to express his/her interest and concerns for the schools. Accordingly, the public is cordially invited to attend Board meetings. Meetings of the Board are conducted for the purposes of carrying on the business of the Board and are closed to the public only during executive sessions. There are three 20-minute time periods designated for Citizens’ Comments:
1.) During the Preliminaries section of the agenda, as the last item before the start of the Consent Items for the purpose of addressing other concerns that are not Action or Non-Action items on the agenda, 2.) At the beginning of Action for the purpose of addressing action items only, and 3.) At the beginning of Non-Action for the purpose of addressing Non-Action items only. Except when otherwise specified by the Board President, comments by individual citizens in a given time period shall be limited to three minutes with a 30-second warning on the time limit. In order that the Board may fairly and adequately discharge its overall responsibilities, citizens who wish to make requests, representations or proposals to the Board are requested to direct these to the Superintendent, who will deal with them according to the regulations approved by the Board. Ref: Policy BEDH/BEDH-R. | | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
| | Lyman Kaiser | | | | | Lyman Kaiser, Eva Reynolds, co-chairs of the Citizen's Bond Oversight Committee, topic: Bond Contingency Fund Transfer. Mr. Kaiser spoke on behalf of the Citizens' Bond Oversight Committee (CBOC). Mr. Kaiser said this is the right time to move on the projects listed.
| |
|
| D.2 - | Contract Awards | Item Action: None | | | The purpose of this agenda item is to have a standing agenda item in place on a continual weekly basis. This agenda item will be used for capital investment and other contracts. Timing of contract actions is such that it will require continual expeditious board approval of contracts. Some weeks will not have any contracts, while many other weeks will have lists of proposed contracts for board approval. Each week a reference will be submitted listing any proposed contract actions with appropriate information. Solicitation documents and information about each procurement action are available for examination and review in the Business Office. | | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
| | There were no contract awards | | | | | |
|
| D.3 - | Budget Transfers, Appropriations and FTE Approvals - 10 minutes | Item Action: None | | | Board Policy DBJ-Budget Transfers requires the board to approve budget transfers for any fund when: (1) the aggregate amount to be transferred to support any line item, single issue or purpose exceeds $100,000; or (2) the accumulation of budget transfer needs is expected to significantly impact the annual budget; or (3) transfers from one major function category to another major function category exceed $20,000 or (4) strategic plan resource allocations need to be re prioritized. Board approval is also required for general fund contingency transfers over $50,000, or in the event the contingency reserve will be reduced by more than 25% for the fiscal year. Board policy DBJ also states that all capital reserve fund project budget appropriations shall be approved by the board; therefore, any transfer of unspent, or unencumbered monies to other projects, shall be approved by the board. CRS-32-109 (1) (f) (l) states the Board of Education has the specific duty to employ all personnel...and to fix and order paid their compensations. Since the budgetary impact of adding a new position must first be considered prior to the hiring process, Board approval is required when there is a proposed change to the authorized staffing level. Presenters: Glenn Gustafson/Mike Maloney
Ref. Pages: 48-51 | | | | Recommendation That the Board of Education approves the appropriation and transfer of $2,475,000 from the 41 Fund (Bond Fund) program contingency account to the various projects listed. | | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
| | Approve | Transfer of $2,475,000 from the 41 Fund (Bond Fund) program contingency account to the various projects | Tom Strand | Bob Null | Passed | Dr. Bishop introduced the topic and turned over the presentation to Director of Facilities
Mr. Mike Maloney. Mr. Maloney presented a Capital Program Update and spoke to several points.
Director Strand moved that the Board of Education approves the appropriation and transfer of $2,475,000 from the 41 Fund (Bond Fund) program contingency account to the various projects listed. Director Null seconded the motion. Questions and answers followed.
Director Null commented that he felt the district should hold off on any projects until the utilization study was completed. He thought the district should be careful not to spend funds on a site that might be a candidate for closure.
| | | Other | Motion to table this item to the December 17th agenda | Charles Bobbitt | Tom Strand | Failed | | Director Bobbitt moved that this item be tabled until the next meeting on December 17th for approval. Director Strand seconded the motion. Discussion followed. The motion to table this item to December 17th for approval, failed, 4/3. Directors Gudvangen, Hasling, Mann and Tanner voted no. The board returned to the previous motion.
| | | Approve | Vote | | | Passed | | The motion, that the Board of Education approves the appropriation and transfer of $2,475,000 from the 41 Fund (Bond Fund) program contingency account to the various projects listed, passed, 6/1. Director Bobbitt voted no.
| |
|
| D.4 - | Personnel Recommendations-2 minutes | Item Action: Approved | | | The Division of Human Resources provides for consideration a list of Personnel Recommendations. The Board may remove an individual personnel recommendation for separate consideration by amending the original motion to approve the recommendation list. Presenters: Dr. Thurman/Mr. Schenkel
Ref. Page: 52-59 | | | | Recommendation That the Board of Education approves the December 10, 2008, Personnel Recommendations, as submitted by the Administration.
| | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
| | Approve | | Tom Strand | Jan Tanner | Passed | | Director Strand moved that the Board of Education approves the December 10, 2008, Personnel Recommendations, as submitted by the Administration. Director Tanner seconded the motion, which passed, 7/0.
| |
|
| D.5 - | Acceptance of the Vision/Mission and Message Platform in Concept - 15 minutes | Item Action: Approved | | | By approving the new vision, mission and message platform, which includes the brand promise, the administration will be able to move forward in marketing the district and its programs, developing policies and procedures for communications standards, and filtering district initiatives and communications. Presenter: Ms. Elaine NaleskiRef. Pages: 60-62 | | | | Recommendation That the Board of Education accept the vision/mission and message platform in concept and direct the administration to develop policies and procedures to ensure brand consistency in all school/district communication vehicles.
| | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
| | Approve | mission vision | John Gudvangen | Sandra Mann | Passed | Director Gudvangen moved that the Board of Education accept the vision/mission and message platform in concept and direct the administration to develop policies and procedures to ensure brand consistency in all school/district communication vehicles. Director Mann seconded the motion. Discussion, questions and answers followed.
The motion, that the Board of Education accept the vision/mission and message platform in concept and direct the administration to develop policies and procedures to ensure brand consistency in all school/district communication vehicles, passed, 6/1. Director Bobbitt voted no.
| | | Break 8:30-8:45 p.m. | | | | | |
|
| E.1 - | Citizens' Comments | Item Action: None | | | The Board as a representative body of the District wishes to provide an avenue for any citizen to express his/her interest and concerns for the schools. Accordingly, the public is cordially invited to attend Board meetings. Meetings of the Board are conducted for the purposes of carrying on the business of the Board and are closed to the public only during executive sessions. There are three 20-minute time periods designated for Citizens’ Comments:
1.) During the Preliminaries section of the agenda, as the last item before the start of the Consent Items for the purpose of addressing other concerns that are not Action or Non-Action items on the agenda, 2.) At the beginning of Action for the purpose of addressing action items only, and 3.) At the beginning of Non-Action for the purpose of addressing Non-Action items only. Except when otherwise specified by the Board President, comments by individual citizens in a given time period shall be limited to three minutes with a 30-second warning on the time limit. In order that the Board may fairly and adequately discharge its overall responsibilities, citizens who wish to make requests, representations or proposals to the Board are requested to direct these to the Superintendent, who will deal with them according to the regulations approved by the Board. Ref: Policy BEDH/BEDH-R. | | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
| | There were no citizens' comments pertaining to non-action items | | | | | |
|
| E.2 - | Administration Proposal for the Emerson Facility - 30 minutes | Item Action: None | | | The Board of Education has been briefed throughout the Fall regarding the status of Emerson Edison. As the Board of Education considers a course of action to respond to Emerson Edison’s inability to make AYP the Administrative Team began to explore options and opportunities if the District took this site back and made it a District school. Attached you will find a recommendation for action to bring Emerson back as a District school. Presenters: Dr. Bishop/Dr. Thurman/Mr. Gustafson/Mr. Poore
Ref. Pages: 107-129 | | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
| | Objectives and Agenda | | | | Dr. Bishop provided an introduction and turned over the presentation to Deputy Superintendent Mr. Poore.
Mr. Poore presented an overview of the administrative proposal. Each item was addressed by the personnel listed. Prior to actually reviewing the objectives and agenda, Director Null asked that administration find other words to use other than "opening" and "closing." The word "restructure" was suggested.
Objectives and Agenda - Factors to consider in reopening a school: Kandy Claybaugh/Holly Brilliant
- Instructional Model: David Malone/Cheryl DeGeorge
- School of Innovation: Dr. Bishop/team
- Support to Affected Sites: Mike Poore
- Personnel Request: Dr. Thurman
- Fiscal Realities: Glenn Gustafson
- Partnership Concept: Mary Ley/Mike Kazmierski
Discussion, questions and answers followed. | |
|
| E.3 - | Revisions to Policies BDFB-Vocational Advisory Council, JKF- Educational Alternatives for Expelled Students and JKG-Expulsion Prevention - 15 minutes | Item Action: None | | | As a result of House Bill 08-1079, C.R.S. 23-8-103(2)(c), any statutory reference to “vocational education” is now “career and technical education”. This verbiage change requires updates to policies JKF- Educational Alternatives for Expelled Students, JKG-Expulsion Prevention Program, and BDFB-Vocational Advisory Committee.Presenters: Mr. Poore/Ms. McConnell
Ref. Pages: 130-136 | | | | Recommendation Review and approved revisions to policies JKF, JKG and BDFB.
| | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
| | | | | | Dr. Bishop introduced the next three topics: Revisions to policies BDFB, JKD/JKE and DFA/DFAA and turned over the presentation of BDFB and JKD/JKE to Mr. Poore.
Mr. Poore and Teina McConnell, director of Career and Technical Education, reviewed the proposed revisions to policy BDFB.
This item will roll forward to the December 17 agenda as a consent item. | |
|
| E.4 - | Revision to Policy JKD/JKE-2-Discipline of Students with Disabilities - 15 minutes | Item Action: None | | | Due to changes in State and Federal Law, IDEA (formerly Individuals with Disabilities Education Act) has been changed to IDEIA (Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act).Presenters: Mr. Poore/Mr. Carubia
Ref. Pages: 137-140 | | | | Recommendation That the Board of Education reviews and approves revisions to policy JKD/JKE-2.
| | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
| | | | | | Dr. Day, director of Special Education, reviewed the proposed revisions to policies JKD/JKE with the board.
This item will roll forward to the December 17 agenda as a consent item. | |
|
| E.5 - | Revision to Policy DFA/DFAA-Statement of Investment - 15 minutes | Item Action: None | | | Board Policy DFA-DFAA is the District’s investment policy which governs the management and operations of the District’s investment portfolio. Presenter: Mr. Gustafson
Ref. Pages: 141-151 | | | | Recommendation Review and approve revisions to Board of Education Policy DFA-DFAA.
| | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
| | | | | | Mr. Gustafson reviewed the proposed revisions to policy DFA/DFAA with the board, stating that it was mostly housekeeping changes.
This item will roll forward to the December 17 agenda as a consent item. | |
|
| E.6 - | FY2008-2009 Mid-Year Budget Modifications - 30 minutes | Item Action: None | | | Each year the District prepares a mid-year budget document. The mid-year budget revision reflects the final certified pupil count, property tax revenues based on the county’s final assessed valuations, the audited beginning fund balances, and other revenue and expenditure adjustments as needed. Presenters: Mr. Gustafson/Ms. Kluck
Ref. Pages: 152 & Under Separate Cover | | | | Recommendation That the Board of Education approves the FY08/09 Mid-Year Budget Update modifications and revised appropriation levels as presented by the administration.
| | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
| | | | | | Dr. Bishop introduced the topic and turned over the presentation to Ms. Kluck.
Ms. Rebecca Kluck, Executive Director of Budget and Planning, reviewed the FY 08-09 Mid-Year Modifications.
Discussion, questions and answers followed.
This item will roll forward to the December 17 agenda as an action item.
| |
|
| F. | REPORTS AND DISCUSSION ITEMS |
| F.1 - | Superintendent/Administrative Reports | Item Action: None | | | This agenda item is reserved for presentations, status reports, and announcements to the Board by the Superintendent and the Administration that have not been provided as information only in the Board packets. Unless otherwise directed by the Board, annual and standing reports not requiring Board action are to be provided in hard copy for information only in the Board Director packets. The superintendent has the opportunity to report on a range of topics during this time.SAR Update (Dr. Demi-Smith)15 minutes (SARs are embargoed until December 9 and will be delivered to the board Under Separate Cover) | | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
| | School Accountability Reports (SARs) | | | | Dr. Bishop introduced the topic, saying that the board would be reviewing the 2007-2008 SARs, and turned over the presentation to Dr. Demi-Smith.
Executive Director of AERO Dr. Janeen Demi-Smith presented an overview of the 2007-2008 School Accountability Reports. Executive Director of Achievement and Accountability Ms. Shirley Stevens assisted during the questions/answers period.
Discussion, questions and answers followed.
| |
|
| F.2 - | Phase I of Draft Plan of the Utilization Study - 15 minutes | Item Action: None | | | An update from the steering committee meeting on December 9 will be provided to the board.Presenter: Mr. Poore | | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
| | | | | | Mr. Poore presented an update of Phase II of the draft plan of the utilization study. He commented that the next steering committee meeting would be Thursday, December 18th.
Discussion, questions and answers followed.
Mr. Poore said that he hoped to provide the board with an updated document by December 19th, but it could be later in the month.
Directors Bobbitt and Null voiced their opinions that administration should listen to the community now and not wait for January (Phase III of the Draft Plan schedule). Mr. Poore acknowledged and tried to address their concerns.
| |
|
| F.3 - | Other Discussion Items | Item Action: None | | | Board members will have the opportunity for open discussion. | | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
|
|
| F.4 - | Board Subcommittee Reports | Item Action: None | | | Board members will have the opportunity to report on their respective subcommittees. | | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
| | | | | | | Director Tanner submitted a written report.
| |
|
| G.1 - | New Agenda Items from Board Discussion | Item Action: None | | | Board members have the opportunity to bring forward items for a future agenda. | | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
|
|
| G.2 - | School Utilization | Item Action: None | | | - Phase I (November): draft plan to steering committee & administration develops recommendation
- Phase II (December): draft plan/recommendation goes to staff
- Phase III (January): draft plan/recommendation goes to community
- Phase IV (February): draft plan/recommendation to the Board of Education: hearing, non-action, action
The Board of Education will be provided updates under Reports & Discussion Items November-January. Possible work session on the Draft Plan February 4, followed by a public hearing, non-action on February 11 and action February 25, 2009. | | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
|
|
| G.4 - | Choice Permit Policy Discussion - TBD | Item Action: None | | | The Board of Education will discuss the choice permit policy at a future meeting
| | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
|
|
| G.5 - | Magnet School Concepts - TBD | Item Action: None | | | Magnet School Concepts will be presented sometime after the November elections. | | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
|
|
| H. | FUTURE WORK SESSIONS LIST REVIEW AND DISCUSSION FOR ADDITIONAL WORK SESSIONS ITEMS |
| H.1 - | January 21, 2008, Work Session | Item Action: None | | | - Board Input for FY 09/10 Budget Development
- Superintendent Search Work
| | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
|
|
| I. | ADMINISTRATION’S TASK LIST REVIEW AND UPDATE |
| I.1 - | Task List Review 2 minutes | Item Action: None | | | The Administration Task List consists of requests from Board directors for information/analysis within specified time lines and will be reviewed and updated during this time. These requests should primarily be tasking for information/analysis and should not be for the scheduling of future agenda items. A recommendation should be included with the task for the purpose indicating as whether or not it needs to be included on the Calendar. Items may be added to the task list with the agreement of four Board Directors as indicated by head nods. Ref. Pages: 153-158 | | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
|
|
| J. | CALENDAR REVIEW AND UPDATE |
| J.1 - | Calendar Review 2 minutes | Item Action: None | | | The Board's Calendar will be reviewed and updated during this time. Items may be added to the Calendar with the agreement of four Board Directors as indicated by head nods. To look at district events and to access the District Calendar go to our home page at www.d11.org. On the left hand side of the screen, click on Calendars, then D11 Calendars. In the center of that page, in the drop down box, select District Calendar.
Upcoming meetings/events: - December 10, 2008, regular meeting
- December 17, 2008, regular meeting
Ref. Pages: 159-169 | | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
|
|
| | | Item Action: None | | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
| | | | | | The Board of Education adjourned at 11:30 p.m.
Julie Rene Stevens, Secretary to the Board of Education
| |
|
|