| |
Roll CallCharles Bobbitt, Director John Gudvangen, Treasurer Tami Hasling, President Sandra Mann, Director Bob Null, Director
Tom Strand, Vice-PresidentJanet Tanner, Secretary
|
Item Action:
None |
| |
Approval Sheet
( KB)
|
| |
|
Motions
|
|
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present at Roll Call were President Tami Hasling, Vice-President Tom Strand, Secretary Janet Tanner and Directors Charles Bobbitt, Sandra Mann and Bob Null. Treasurer John Gudvangen arrived during executive session. Also present: Superintendent Dr. Terry Bishop, Deputy Superintendent of Personnel Support Services Dr. Mary Thurman, Chief Financial Officer/Deputy Superintendent Mr. Glenn Gustafson, Deputy Superintendent of Educational Support Services Mr. Michael Poore, Human Resources Division Head Mr. David Schenkel, Communications and Community Relations Director Elaine Naleski and Secretary to the Board of Education Julie Rene Stevens.
|
|
|
|
| A.3 - |
Moment of Silence - |
| A.4 - |
Adoption of the Agenda - |
| |
The agenda presented to the Board in the Board’s packet will be considered for approval at this time. A Board Director or the Superintendent may request to, add, delete or table an item, i.e., an emergency school closure approval action that is in accordance with Policies. Board Directors shall make a separate motion for each item they seek to have added, deleted, or tabled. Reordering items on the agenda requires approval of a single motion with a majority vote of the quorum present.
A Board Director’s request that a non-emergency item be added to the agenda, as action shall require for approval a two-thirds majority of the entire Board. The Director making the request shall provide a copy of the motion and materials to all Board Directors. A Board Director’s request that a non-emergency item be added to the agenda, as non-action shall require for approval a majority of the quorum present. The Director making the request shall provide a copy of the motion and materials to all Board Directors.
|
Item Action:
Approved |
| |
Recommendation That the Board of Education adopts the agenda, as presented (and/or amended). |
|
| |
Approval Sheet
( KB)
|
| |
|
Motions
|
|
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
|
| Approve |
|
Tom Strand |
Bob Null |
Passed |
Director Strand moved to adopt the agenda with the modification of moving non-action item D2. Procedures for the Modification of the 2008 Mill Levy Override (MLO) to action as action item C5. Director Null seconded the motion.
President Hasling clarified that moving a non-action item directly to action required a two-thirds majority vote of the board.
The motion, to adopt the agenda as modified passed, 6/0. Director Gudvangen was absent.
|
|
|
|
| A.5 - |
Executive Session - |
| |
The Board of Education may, under state statutes, go into Executive Session to discuss matters pertaining to:
1) property transactions [per C.R.S. 24-6-402(4)(a)] [particular matter:]; 2) legal advice [per C.R.S. 24-6-402(4)(b)] [particular matter:]; 3) security arrangements or investigations [per C.R.S. 24-6-402(4)(d)] [particular matter:]; 4) negotiations [per C.R.S. 24-6-402(4)(e)] [particular matter: ]; 5) X personnel [per C.R.S. 24-6-402(4)(f)] [particular matter: principals];6) individual student(s) [per C.R.S. 24-6-402(4)(h)] [particular matter: ]; 7) documents that may not be disclosed under the Colorado Open Records Act [per C.R.S. 24-6-402(4)(g)] [particular matter ]; and 8) matters required to be kept confidential by state or federal law [per C.R.S. 24-6-402(4)(c)][specific legal citation:].
Executive Session from approximately 5:30 p.m.-6:30p.m. The Board of Education will reconvene into regular session at approximately 6:30 p.m.
|
Item Action:
Approved |
| |
Recommendation To convene into Executive Session. The Board of Education may, under state statutes, go into Executive Session to discuss matters pertaining to property transactions, legal advice, security arrangements or investigations, negotiations, personnel, individual students, documents that may not be disclosed under the Colorado Open Records Act and matters required to be kept confidential by law. |
|
| |
Approval Sheet
( KB)
|
| |
|
Motions
|
|
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
|
| Approve |
|
Jan Tanner |
Tom Strand |
Passed |
Director Tanner moved that the Board of Education convene into Executive Session to discuss personnel. Director Strand seconded the motion, which passed, 7/0.
The Board of Education convened into executive session to discuss personnel [per C.R.S. 24-6-402(4)(f)] [particular matter: principals].
|
|
|
|
| A.6 - |
Pledge of Allegiance - |
| |
The Board of Education invites the public in attendance to stand and recite the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag of the United States of America.
|
Item Action:
None |
| |
Approval Sheet
( KB)
|
| |
|
Motions
|
|
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
President Hasling led those present in the Pledge of Allegiance.
|
|
|
|
| A.8 - |
Modification of the Agenda - |
| |
A Board Director, by a motion, or the Superintendent (via a recommendation for a motion), may cause the modification of the previously approved agenda only for the following reason:
Required action following discussion in Executive Session.
|
Item Action:
None |
| |
Recommendation That the Board of Education adopts the agenda modifications. |
|
| |
Approval Sheet
( KB)
|
| |
|
Motions
|
|
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
|
|
There were no modifications to the agenda |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The Board as a representative body of the District wishes to provide an avenue for any citizen to express his/her interest and concerns for the schools. Accordingly, the public is cordially invited to attend Board meetings. Meetings of the Board are conducted for the purposes of carrying on the business of the Board and are closed to the public only during executive sessions. There are three 20-minute time periods designated for Citizens’ Comments:
1.) During the Preliminaries section of the agenda, as the last item before the start of the Consent Items for the purpose of addressing other concerns that are not Action or Non-Action items on the agenda, 2.) At the beginning of Action for the purpose of addressing action items only, and 3.) At the beginning of Non-Action for the purpose of addressing Non-Action items only. Except when otherwise specified by the Board President, comments by individual citizens in a given time period shall be limited to three minutes with a 30-second warning on the time limit. In order that the Board may fairly and adequately discharge its overall responsibilities, citizens who wish to make requests, representations or proposals to the Board are requested to direct these to the Superintendent, who will deal with them according to the regulations approved by the Board. Ref: Policy BEDH/BEDH-R.
|
Item Action:
None |
| |
Approval Sheet
( KB)
|
| |
|
Motions
|
|
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
|
|
Barry Reid |
|
|
|
|
Barry Reid, topic: Wasson High School's 50th year celebration. Mr. Reid gave a brief history of Wasson and Wasson alumni. He invited all to attend a day long celebration at Wasson on September 27, 2008, in the south parking lot and to the game afterward.
|
|
|
|
| B.1 - | Adoption of Consent Items - 2 minutes | Item Action: Approved | | | Consent items are placed in the consent portion of the agenda. If board members have any questions concerning these items, they should be directed to the Superintendent or designee prior to the board meeting. If discussion is required on any one of the items, it may be removed from the consent agenda. Those items indicated as being consent items will be adopted by one single motion unless a member of the board requests an item be removed from the consent agenda. | | | | Recommendation To adopt all consent items as designated in the agenda. Consent items: B.2. Approval of Board Meeting Minutes | | | | Approval Sheet
( KB)
| | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
| | Approve | | Tom Strand | Bob Null | Passed | | Director Strand moved to adopt the consent item, Approval of Board Meeting Minutes. Director Null seconded the motion, which passed, 7/0.
| |
|
| B.2 - | Approval of Board Meeting Minutes | Item Action: None | | | Ref. Pages: Under Separate Cover | | | | Recommendation That the Board of Education approves the minutes of the June 25, 2008, regular meeting, the July 9, July 23 and August 5, 2008, special meetings. All minutes are available on the district website after approval by the Board of Education.
| | | | Approval Sheet
( KB)
| | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
| | | | | | | The Board of Education approved the minutes of the June 25, 2008, regular meeting, the July 9, July 23 and August 5, 2008, special meetings. All minutes are available on the district website after approval by the Board of Education.
| |
|
| C.1 - | Citizens' Comments | Item Action: None | | | The Board as a representative body of the District wishes to provide an avenue for any citizen to express his/her interest and concerns for the schools. Accordingly, the public is cordially invited to attend Board meetings. Meetings of the Board are conducted for the purposes of carrying on the business of the Board and are closed to the public only during executive sessions. There are three 20-minute time periods designated for Citizens’ Comments:
1.) During the Preliminaries section of the agenda, as the last item before the start of the Consent Items for the purpose of addressing other concerns that are not Action or Non-Action items on the agenda, 2.) At the beginning of Action for the purpose of addressing action items only, and 3.) At the beginning of Non-Action for the purpose of addressing Non-Action items only. Except when otherwise specified by the Board President, comments by individual citizens in a given time period shall be limited to three minutes with a 30-second warning on the time limit. In order that the Board may fairly and adequately discharge its overall responsibilities, citizens who wish to make requests, representations or proposals to the Board are requested to direct these to the Superintendent, who will deal with them according to the regulations approved by the Board. Ref: Policy BEDH/BEDH-R. | | | | Approval Sheet
( KB)
| | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
| | There were no citizens' comments pertaining to action items | | | | | |
|
| C.2 - | Contract Awards - 20 minutes | Item Action: Approved | | | The purpose of this agenda item is to have a standing agenda item in place on a continual weekly basis. This agenda item will be used for capital investment and other contracts. Timing of contract actions is such that it will require continual expeditious board approval of contracts. Some weeks will not have any contracts, while many other weeks will have lists of proposed contracts for board approval. Each week a reference will be submitted listing any proposed contract actions with appropriate information. Solicitation documents and information about each procurement action are available for examination and review in the Business Office.
Presenters: Mr. Gustafson/Mr. Elliott
Ref. Pages: 8-9 | | | | Recommendation Approval of Intergovernmental Agreement C2009-0023 with the Coalition for a Thorough and Uniform Colorado Public Education System Recommend the Board of Education approve an Intergovernmental Agreement with the Coalition for a Thorough and Uniform Colorado Public Education System for FY 08-09 in the amount of $29,462.80 to cover annual lobbying costs.
Approval of Intergovernmental Agreement C2009-0046 for the 2008 General/Coordinated Election Recommend the Executive Director, Procurement and Contracting, execute the IGA for the 2008 General/Coordinated Election to be held on November 4, 2008, at an estimated cost of $103,126.
| | | | Approval of Intergovernmental Agreement C2009-0023 with the Coalition for a Thorough and Uniform Colorado Public Education System
(27 KB)
| | | Approval Sheet
( KB)
| | | Coalition Contract IGA
(59 KB)
| | | Coalition Agreement attachment
(12 KB)
| | | Transmittal Letter for Approval of IGA for the 2008 General/Coordinated Election
(27 KB)
| | | County IGA
(147 KB)
| | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
| | Approve | Approval of Intergovernmental Agreement C2009-0023 with the Coalition for a Thorough and Uniform Colorado Public Education System | Tom Strand | Jan Tanner | Passed | Dr. Bishop introduced the topic and turned over the presentation to Executive Director of Procurement and Contracting Mr. John Elliott. Mr. Elliott presented the Intergovernmental Agreement.
Director Strand moved that the Board of Education approve an Intergovernmental Agreement with the Coalition for a Thorough and Uniform Colorado Public Education System for FY 08-09 in the amount of $29,462.80 to cover annual lobbying costs. Director Tanner seconded the motion.
Questions, answers and comments followed.
The motion, that the Board of Education approve an Intergovernmental Agreement with the Coalition for a Thorough and Uniform Colorado Public Education System for FY 08-09 in the amount of $29,462.80 to cover annual lobbying costs, passed, 7/0.
| | | Approve | Approval of Intergovernmental Agreement C2009-0046 for the 2008 General/Coordinated Election | Jan Tanner | Tom Strand | Passed | Dr. Bishop introduced the topic and turned over the presentation to Mr. Elliott. Mr. Elliott presented the Intergovernmental Agreement and provided some background information on the contract.
Director Tanner moved that the Executive Director, Procurement and Contracting, execute the IGA for the 2008 General/Coordinated Election to be held on November 4, 2008, at an estimated cost of $103,126. Director Strand seconded the motion.
Questions and answers followed.
The motion that the Executive Director, Procurement and Contracting, execute the IGA for the 2008 General/Coordinated Election to be held on November 4, 2008, at an estimated cost of $103,126 passed, 7/0.
| |
|
| C.3 - | Budget Transfers, Appropriations and FTE Approvals - 20 minutes | Item Action: Approved | | | Board Policy DBJ-Budget Transfers requires the board to approve budget transfers for any fund when: (1) the aggregate amount to be transferred to support any line item, single issue or purpose exceeds $100,000; or (2) the accumulation of budget transfer needs is expected to significantly impact the annual budget; or (3) transfers from one major function category to another major function category exceed $20,000 or (4) strategic plan resource allocations need to be re prioritized. Board approval is also required for general fund contingency transfers over $50,000, or in the event the contingency reserve will be reduced by more than 25% for the fiscal year. Board policy DBJ also states that all capital reserve fund project budget appropriations shall be approved by the board; therefore, any transfer of unspent, or unencumbered monies to other projects, shall be approved by the board. CRS-32-109 (1) (f) (l) states the Board of Education has the specific duty to employ all personnel...and to fix and order paid their compensations. Since the budgetary impact of adding a new position must first be considered prior to the hiring process, Board approval is required when there is a proposed change to the authorized staffing level. Presenters: Mr. Gustafson/Ms. Kluck/Mr. Elliott/Mr. Poore
Ref. Pages: 10-15 | | | | Recommendation Preschool Fund Appropriation Increase That the Board of Education approves the increase in appropriations to the Preschool Fund from $2,206,702 to $2,300,197. Reutilization Contract Recommendation 1: That the Board of Education approves a contingency fund transfer for a K-12 School Utilization Study in the amount of $124,960. or Recommendation 2: That the Board of Education approves a contingency fund transfer for a K-5 School Utilization Study in the amount of $86,235.
Bridges to Opportunity Program (5th Year) That the Board of Education approves the $124,965 General Fund contingency transfer to fund the Bridges to Opportunity program for FY08/09.
| | | | Preschool Fund Appropriation Increase Memorandum
(270 KB)
| | | Approval Sheet
( KB)
| | | General Fund Contingency Transfer Request for School Utilization Study Memorandum
(71 KB)
| | | K-12 School Utilization Study Transfer Request
(44 KB)
| | | K-5 School Utilization Study Transfer Request
(44 KB)
| | | Bridges to Opportunity Program Contingency Transfer Memorandum
(278 KB)
| | | Bridges to Opportunity Contingency Transfer Request
(42 KB)
| | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
| | Approve | Preschool Fund Appropriation Increase | Tom Strand | Bob Null | Passed | Dr. Bishop introduced the topic and turned over the presentation to Executive Director of Budget and Planning Ms. Rebecca Kluck. Ms. Kluck presented the preschool fund appropriation increase.
Director Strand moved that the Board of Education approves the increase in appropriations to the Preschool Fund from $2,206,702 to $2,300,197. Director Null seconded the motion.
Questions and answers followed.
The motion that the Board of Education approves the increase in appropriations to the Preschool Fund from $2,206,702 to $2,300,197 passed, 7/0.
| | | Approve | Reutilization Contract | Bob Null | Charles Bobbitt | Passed | Mr. Elliott presented the reutilization contract.
Director Null moved that the Board of Education approves a contingency fund transfer for a K-12 School Utilization Study in the amount of $124,960. Director Bobbitt seconded the motion.
Questions, answers and discussion followed.
Director Strand asked Dr. Bishop which plan he preferred, the K-5 utilization study or the K-12 utilization study. Dr. Bishop replied that, from his point of view and in talking with the staff, he thought it would be very difficult to take on a K-12 study. He suggested that it perhaps be done in two steps, starting with a K-5 study. Discussion continued. Mr. Elliott advised that if the board approved the funds, they were ready to award this contract tomorrow and the vendor has advised that they would be ready to start on Monday. Their time line showed that they would complete the K-12 study by the end of October for the review of the administration, followed by presentation to the board on November 5, 2008, for their approval. Dr. Bishop did say that he felt the K-5 study was the most urgent. Questions, answers and discussion continued.
The motion that the Board of Education approves a contingency fund transfer for a K-12 School Utilization Study in the amount of $124,960 passed, 7/0. | | | Approve | Bridges to Opportunity Program (5th Year) | Jan Tanner | Charles Bobbitt | Passed | Mr. Gustafson introduced the topic and turned over the presentation to Mr. Poore, who presented and explained the 5th year program.
Director Tanner moved that the Board of Education approves the $124,965 General Fund contingency transfer to fund the Bridges to Opportunity program for FY08/09. Director Bobbitt seconded the motion.
Questions and answers followed.
Director Bobbitt commended administration for bringing forward all the programs and ideas to get kids to stay in school and to come back into high school. He also thanked Communications and Community Relations Director Ms. Naleski for coordinating so many great, positive events for the district. He also thanked community members who showed up at the event at the Citadel Mall.
The motion, that the Board of Education approves the $124,965 General Fund contingency transfer to fund the Bridges to Opportunity program for FY08/09, passed, 7/0.
| |
|
| C.4 - | Personnel Recommendations-2 minutes | Item Action: Approved | | | The Division of Human Resources provides for consideration a list of Personnel Recommendations. The Board may remove an individual personnel recommendation for separate consideration by amending the original motion to approve the recommendation list. Presenters: Dr. Thurman/Mr. Schenkel
Ref. Pages: 16-38 | | | | Recommendation That the Board of Education approves the August 13, 2008, Personnel Recommendations, as submitted by the Administration.
| | | | Personnel Recommendations dated August 13, 2008
(168 KB)
| | | Approval Sheet
( KB)
| | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
| | Approve | | Tom Strand | Charles Bobbitt | Passed | Dr. Bishop spoke briefly about the personnel recommendations.
Director Strand moved that the Board of Education approves the August 13, 2008, Personnel Recommendations, as submitted by the Administration. Director Bobbitt seconded the motion.
Director Bobbitt asked Mr. Schenkel to explain why some personnel recommendations were listed with salaries to-be-determined. Mr. Schenkel commented that typically all information needed to set salaries cannot be obtained right away; in some cases the Human Resources Department has to wait to receive transcripts, check out eligibility and set the salary according to the Master Agreement. It usually takes a few weeks after school starts to get that information.
The motion that the Board of Education approves the August 13, 2008, Personnel Recommendations, as submitted by the Administration, passed, 7/0.
| |
|
| C.5 - | Procedures for the Modification of the 2008 Mill Levy Override (MLO) - 15 Minutes | Item Action: Approved | | | Procedures for the modification of the 2008 MLO plan have been developed for the purpose of supporting effective decision-making by the Board of Education and for the development and adoption of the election question prior to the county deadline.Presenter: Mr. Gustafson
Ref. Page: 39 | | | | Recommendation That the Board of Education approves the MLO plan amendment procedures, as submitted by the Administration.
| | | | Procedures for the Modification of the 2008 MLO Memorandum
(277 KB)
| | | Approval Sheet
( KB)
| | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
| | Approve | | Tom Strand | Bob Null | Passed | Dr. Bishop introduced the topic and turned over the presentation to Mr. Gustafson. Mr. Gustafson reviewed the procedures to modify the 2008 Mill Levy Override with the board members. Any changes proposed would not be final until the board approved the election question, probably on August 27, 2008.
Director Strand moved that the Board of Education approves the MLO plan amendment procedures, as submitted by the Administration. Director Null seconded the motion.
Questions, answers and discussion followed.
The motion, that the Board of Education approves the MLO plan amendment procedures, as submitted by the Administration, passed, 7/0.
| |
|
| D.1 - | Citizens' Comments | Item Action: None | | | The Board as a representative body of the District wishes to provide an avenue for any citizen to express his/her interest and concerns for the schools. Accordingly, the public is cordially invited to attend Board meetings. Meetings of the Board are conducted for the purposes of carrying on the business of the Board and are closed to the public only during executive sessions. There are three 20-minute time periods designated for Citizens’ Comments:
1.) During the Preliminaries section of the agenda, as the last item before the start of the Consent Items for the purpose of addressing other concerns that are not Action or Non-Action items on the agenda, 2.) At the beginning of Action for the purpose of addressing action items only, and 3.) At the beginning of Non-Action for the purpose of addressing Non-Action items only. Except when otherwise specified by the Board President, comments by individual citizens in a given time period shall be limited to three minutes with a 30-second warning on the time limit. In order that the Board may fairly and adequately discharge its overall responsibilities, citizens who wish to make requests, representations or proposals to the Board are requested to direct these to the Superintendent, who will deal with them according to the regulations approved by the Board. Ref: Policy BEDH/BEDH-R. | | | | Approval Sheet
( KB)
| | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
| | There were no citizens comments pertaining to non-action items | | | | | |
|
| D.2 - | 2008 Mill Levy Override Election Question - 60 Minutes | Item Action: None | | | Attached is the 2008 Mill Levy Override Election Question as drafted by the District's legal counsel, HRO. We are still working on the mill levy calculation and will provide those numbers at a later date.Presenter: Mr. Gustafson
Ref. Pages: 40-44 | | | | Recommendation That the Board of Education approves the 2008 Mill Levy Override Election Question Resolution, as submitted by the Administration.
| | | | 2008 Mill Levy Override Election Question Memorandum
(275 KB)
| | | Approval Sheet
( KB)
| | | 2008 Mill Levy Override Spending Plan
(25 KB)
| | | 2008 Mill Levy Override Definitions
(52 KB)
| | | 2008 Mill Levy Override Election Question
(48 KB)
| | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
| | Introduction and Presentation | | | | Dr. Bishop introduced the topic and turned over the presentation to Deputy Superintendent/CFO Mr. Glenn Gustafson. Mr. Gustafson presented the 2008 Mill Levy Override Election Question. Holme, Roberts and Owen Attorney Steve Gaines was present to address certain aspects of the election question.
Discussion followed. Mr. Gaines and Mr. Gustafson fielded questions from the board.
| | | Discussion on proceeding with the full $21.5 million | | | | Director Bobbitt asked if all board members were willing to proceed with the full $21.5 million. He stated his concerns. Director Gudvangen said he was fine with the full amount. Director Null didn't think there would be another chance to ask for funds, especially if the board decided to phase in the funds. Director Null suggested that the board start with $21.5 million. Directors Mann, Strand and Tanner were also in favor of proceeding with the full amount.
The board continued reviewing the Mill Levy Override Plan and each point of the plan (A through H on agenda page 41). Discussion, questions and answers followed.
Dr. Bishop commented that the state will need to make some changes to keep up with improvement in education, what with so many districts going for mill levys and reaching their maximum.
| | | Approve w/ Conditions | Director Gudvangen's Motion | John Gudvangen | Tom Strand | Passed | Director Gudvangen moved for the purposes of discussion that $2 million of the $6 million be re-directed towards these priorities: hiring instructional staff in difficult to hire areas, such as math and science; provide incentives for instructional staff to teach at schools with the widest achievement gap; same for Title 1 schools; direct funds to schools that are below the full accreditation level; provide incentives for staff who are performing well to stay at high needs schools; provide incentives for staff at schools with declining performance and attract staff to lower performing schools. Director Strand seconded the motion. Director Gudvangen commented that he left out additional time for instruction, especially in targeted schools. Director Gudvangen then spoke to his motion. One issue he thought they should discuss was how sustainable it is to take ninety new FTEs (in this proposal) and then have a ninety percent general fund parameter for new compensation, "Ninety percent of new monies go to the compensation on ninety new FTEs; in fact I would argue that this is a flaw in the 2000 mill levy where we have upwards of maybe two hundred FTEs and yet every one of those is funded with the same $26 million every year but the ninety percent new parameter money must come out of the new money on all those mill levy override FTEs. I don't think that's sustainable." He asked the superintendent and his staff to consider how to make it more sustainable because, basically, it is put in the mill levy but funded with general fund money (for ninety new FTEs). He also commented that without significant proof that we are having trouble attracting and retaining staff in general, he'd like to get back to feeling like some portion of the compensation money is going to certain accountability parameters, particularly for high needs schools or math/science difficulties. Discussion continued.
Discussion followed on potential amendments. Director Bobbitt proposed new teacher coaching, mentoring and incentives for teachers to stay (longevity bonus). Director Strand proposed taking out math/science teachers, don't single them out. Director Gudvangen said he was okay with the words "hard to staff" instead of citing specific positions and he commented that this shouldn't preclude additional time at some schools.
Dr. Bishop commented that he has called a meeting tomorrow to go over this amendment and detail to the program implementation plan (pip) and come back to the board as soon as possible with the revision. Board members were in agreement that they were satisfied with this language and directive to Dr. Bishop and his staff.
With Director Gudvangen's consent, Mr. Gustafson re-capped the motion:
Take $2 million from the teacher salary line item and put it into targeted performance areas.
Use the $2 million for: hard to staff areas, teacher incentives to close the achievement gap, teacher incentives in Title 1 schools, instructors at schools below accreditation, incentives for teachers in low performing schools and incentives at schools with declining enrollment.
This motion passed, 7/0.
| | | Approve w/ Conditions | Director Strand's Motion | Tom Strand | Bob Null | Failed | Director Strand moved to add $500,000 to item A: Career & Tech Education Pathways Expansion; taking $500,000 from category D, specifically Purchase 21st Century Technology. Director Null seconded the motion. Discussion followed.
Director Null suggested that instead of taking $500,000 all from one category, spread it out over several different areas; he suggested taking $100,000 out of G, Arts Education and $200,000 from the high school staffing model and $200,000 from E, Special Education/Gifted and Talented, English Language Learner. Discussion followed.
Mr. Poore commented on Career and Tech Education and offered the board some more specifics regarding for what the funds might be used. He cautioned against moving funds out of item D, Textbooks, Curriculum and 21st Century Resources.
President Hasling suggested that the motion simply be "add $500,000 to item A: Career and Tech Education Pathways." Board members agreed. The motion failed, 4/3. Directors Gudvangen, Hasling, Mann and Tanner voted no.
| | | Discussion | | | | Board members asked for further details on item G, Arts Education. Fine Arts Facilitator Tom Fleecs spoke to specifics and passed out a document that provided a detailed explanation for use of funds and calculations.
Discussion continued on the 21st Century Staffing model and high school staffing and how many courses high school students take on average. Mr. Keane explained that the 22 teachers would be a pool of teachers divvied out on the basis of the student count. He said the numbers were relative to student count figure and that by using the formula they provide equity and by using the number of class sizes they directly address the issue of not having enough teachers to address the number of classes the kids take. Mr. Keane said they had the data to support the request for more teachers for that purpose; he would provide it to the board in a Friday Night Note.
Director Gudvangen asked, "How do we address the issue of whether or not it's appropriate or sustainable to continue funding 99 or 101 FTEs and give them the 90% parameter increase?" Mr. Gustafson said Director Gudvangen's point was right on target, and said what would happen was the district would hire these additional staff, give pay raises to staff and basically increase the total base compensation of the district. Approximately $140,000 goes to salaries, with another $10,000 added. Mr. Gustafson said that every year, as the district allocates pay raises, "We would have a higher burden to pay for those pay raises because we didn't build it into this mill levy override. That was a conscious decision." He also commented that as long as the district was in declining enrollment, it would have a hard time staying competitive in the marketplace with salaries.
Director Gudvangen commented that numbers of staff increases, yet the student count goes down. Not just enrollment, but staffing is the issue. Discussion continued.
| | | Director Bobbitt's Motion | | | | | Director Bobbitt moved to eliminate the ELL teachers from item E, which failed for lack of a second.
| | | Approve | Director Null's Motion | Bob Null | Sandra Mann | Passed | Director Null moved to add a category for Athletics, at a cost of $300,000. Director Mann seconded. Discussion followed. Director Bobbitt moved to amend by increasing the amount of funding to $500,000. The amendment failed for lack of a second. The motion to add $300,000 for athletics passed, 5/2. Directors Gudvangen and Tanner voted no. The board agreed that administration could propose where to obtain the funds.
President Hasling asked board members if they wished to discuss phasing in any part of the funds. Board members agreed that they did not wish to phase in any of the funding.
| | | Moving Veritas Charter School Forward | | | | | President Hasling proposed hearing non-action item, D5. Veritas Charter School Permission to Apply to CSI, next for discussion; thereby postponing D4. 2008 Mill Levy Override Governance Plan to after the Veritas presentation. Board members agreed.
| |
|
| D.3 - | Veritas Charter School Permission to Apply to CSI | Item Action: None | | | Representatives from the Veritas Academy Charter School met with district staff to discuss the charter school's program and the feasibility of becoming chartered through District 11. Veritas is seeking to locate in a manufacturing building on North Nevada for a school location. The school plans to open in 2009. The district needs to either grant permission to Veritas to apply to the Charter School Institute (CSI) or allow them to apply for a district charter.Presenter: Mr. GustafsonRef. Pages: 49-56 | | | | Recommendation That the Board of Education approves the resolution to grant permission to Veritas Academy to apply to the Colorado Charter School Institute, as submitted by the Administration.
| | | | Veritas Academy Charter School Permission to Apply to Charter School Institute Memorandum
(290 KB)
| | | Approval Sheet
( KB)
| | | Resolution 2009-1
(27 KB)
| | | Veritas Academy Executive Summary
(28 KB)
| | | Financial Analysis
(213 KB)
| | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
| | | | | | Dr. Bishop turned over the topic to Mr. Gustafson, who made a brief introductory statement and introduced Mr. Hall from Veritas Charter School.
Mr. Eric Hall, a representative from Veritas Academy Charter School, made his presentation to the Board of Education, followed by a budget impact summary presentation (see pages 54-56 in this agenda) by Mr. Gustafson. It was administration's recommendation to grant permission to Veritas Academy to apply to the Colorado Charter School Institute.
Discussion, questions and answers followed.
Director Tanner commented that school districts are forced (because of a law) to place the merits of a school secondary to the financial impact on our district. She said, "That's wrong, we need to change the law." She continued making her point. Mr. Gustafson said that he asked Senator Windels to carry an amendment to a bill one year. He said that they need to find a mechanism in the School Finance Act to carve out all charter kids before the averaging and fund them separately. We do that with pre-school students, but there continues to be resistance in state legislature to modify the school finance formula.
Discussion continued.
Director Bobbitt said he was frustrated and sad that they couldn't bring this school into the district because of the financial impact to the district.
Director Gudvangen commented that it wasn't really an issue of whether they want to be in the district; it's an issue of the charter law compelling one direction only. Veritas wasn't asking to be a district school; they were asking to be a charter school. It's simply an issue of whether it is a CSI charter school or a district charter school. The fiscal impact is what's compelling the board to make some different decisions. He said if we want a school like this in our system, then, "Do a school of innovation under the new law."
President Hasling commented that one of her concerns was the lack of a physical education courses. Discussion continued.
President Hasling closed the discussion, saying that this item will move to action at the next regular board meeting.
| |
|
| D.4 - | 2008 Mill Levy Override Governance Plan - 30 Minutes | Item Action: None | | | The structure, format and language of the 2008 MLO Election Question is of a legal nature and heavily dictated by state statute and the Colorado Constitution. In order to supplement the Election Question with appropriate oversight details, the administration has presented a draft Governance Plan for consideration by the Board of Education.Presenter: Mr. Gustafson
Ref. Pages: 45-48 | | | | Recommendation That the Board of Education approve the 2008 Mill Levy Override Governance Plan, as submitted by the Administration.
| | | | 2008 Mill Levy Override Governance Plan Memorandum
(276 KB)
| | | Approval Sheet
( KB)
| | | 2008 Mill Levy Override Governance Plan
(47 KB)
| | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
| | | | | | | Dr. Bishop introduced the topic and turned over the presentation to Deputy Superintendent/CFO Mr. Gustafson. Attorney Steve Gaines was also present and spoke to the governance plan. There were no questions for further discussion. This item will be action at the next regular meeting.
| |
|
| D.5 - | Revision to Board Policy IJOA: Field Trips - 20 minutes | Item Action: None | | | In order to ensure student and staff safety and limit District 11 liability, it is necessary to develop specific guidelines regarding Field Trips. A collaborative effort has been undertaken in order to clarify and update D11’s Field Trip Policy for our students and staff. A subcommittee was convened to review the current policy and make recommendations. Presenters: Mr. Poore/Mr. Stull
Ref. Pages: 57-70 | | | | Recommendation That the Board of Education approve the revisions to policy IJOA as submitted by the policy subcommittee and Administration.
| | | | Executive Summary - Policy IJOA revisions
(44 KB)
| | | Approval Sheet
( KB)
| | | Revised Policy IJOA
(44 KB)
| | | Revised Regulation to Policy IJOA
(68 KB)
| | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
| | Postponed | | | | | Board members agreed to postpone this item to the next regular board meeting, August 27, 2008, as non-action.
| |
|
| E. | REPORTS AND DISCUSSION ITEMS |
| E.1 - | Superintendent/Administrative Reports | Item Action: None | | | This agenda item is reserved for presentations, status reports, and announcements to the Board by the Superintendent and the Administration that have not been provided as information only in the Board packets. Unless otherwise directed by the Board, annual and standing reports not requiring Board action are to be provided in hard copy for information only in the Board Director packets. The superintendent has the opportunity to report on a range of topics during this time.Overview of CSAP Performance-20 minutes (Dr. Bishop/Dr. Demi-Smith)
Bridges to Opportunity (dropout retrieval & 5th year options)-15 minutes (Dr. Bishop/Mr. Poore)
Achieve K12 online-15 minutes (Dr. Bishop/Mr. Poore) | | | | Approval Sheet
( KB)
| | | CSAP Presentation
(117 KB)
| | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
| | Overview of CSAP Performance | | | | | Dr. Demi-Smith presented a very quick overview of CSAP performance. Dr. Bishop advised that Dr. Thurman would go into more detail with the board at the next regular meeting.
| | | Bridges to Opportunity | | | | Mr. Poore presented a brief discussion on dropout retrieval.
Director Strand requested an update in about a month on the results of the dropout retrieval initiative (out calling) at the Citadel Mall last Wednesday. Board members agreed with Director Strand's request. Dr. Bishop indicated that administration would provide an update.
| | | Closing the Achievement Gap | | | | | Dr. Mary Thurman’s report on closing the achievement gap was postponed until the next meeting.
| |
|
| E.2 - | Other Discussion Items | Item Action: None | | | Board members will have the opportunity for open discussion. | | | | Approval Sheet
( KB)
| | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
|
|
| E.3 - | Board Subcommittee Reports | Item Action: None | | | Board members will have the opportunity to report on their respective subcommittees. | | | | Approval Sheet
( KB)
| | | Tanner Report
(30 KB)
| | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
| | | | | | Director Tanner shared legislative information through a written report.
Director Strand and Director Null attended the last School Configuration and Use Study Committee meeting.
Director Null received a request from the Central Colorado Springs Coalition (CCSC) of neighborhoods for a meeting with school board members. Directors Tanner and Null will work on a response to the group.
Director Mann and Director Tanner met with Glenn Gustafson regarding the legislative agenda. The district will hold a breakfast for area legislators in September.
Director Hasling was asked by the School Configuration and Use Study Committee to give them time at a work session, and the board agreed (head nods).
Director Hasling spoke about board member assignments to schools. She will work on setting a date for a board retreat in September. She asked Director Null and Director Tanner to coordinate various community meetings.
Director Bobbitt thanked the district and especially Elaine Naleski for all the positive publicity for the district’s dropout recovery event at the Citadel last week, as well as other positive publicity for the district in the last few weeks.
| |
|
| F.1 - | New Agenda Items from Board Discussion | Item Action: None | | | Board members have the opportunity to bring forward items for a future agenda. | | | | Approval Sheet
( KB)
| | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
|
|
| F.2 - | New Policy IHBAA-Response to Intervention | Item Action: None | | | This policy will be non-action on August 27, 2008
| | | | Approval Sheet
( KB)
| | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
|
|
| F.3 - | August 2008: Superintendent Search | Item Action: None | | | The Board of Education will discuss a timeline and criteria for the upcoming superintendent search.
| | | | Approval Sheet
( KB)
| | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
|
|
| F.4 - | Development of 2009 Legislative Agenda | Item Action: None | | | Work Session Fall of 2008
| | | | Approval Sheet
( KB)
| | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
|
|
| F.5 - | Choice Permit Policy Discussion - TBD | Item Action: None | | | The Board of Education will discuss the choice permit policy at a future meeting
| | | | Approval Sheet
( KB)
| | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
|
|
| F.6 - | Buena Vista Montessori Magnet - TBD | Item Action: None | | | The Buena Vista Montessori Magnet will be presented to the board at a future date, to be determined. Included in the discussion will be a boundary adjustment and the preschool program expansion | | | | Approval Sheet
( KB)
| | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
|
|
| F.7 - | 403 (b) Tax Sheltered Annuity Plan Document - TBD | Item Action: None | | | Date of presentation: TBD
| | | | Approval Sheet
( KB)
| | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
|
|
| G. | ADMINISTRATION’S TASK LIST REVIEW AND UPDATE |
| G.1 - | Task List Review 2 minutes | Item Action: None | | | The Administration Task List consists of requests from Board directors for information/analysis within specified time lines and will be reviewed and updated during this time. These requests should primarily be tasking for information/analysis and should not be for the scheduling of future agenda items. A recommendation should be included with the task for the purpose indicating as whether or not it needs to be included on the Calendar. Items may be added to the task list with the agreement of four Board Directors as indicated by head nods. Ref. Pages: 71-74 | | | | August 9 Task List
(27 KB)
| | | Approval Sheet
( KB)
| | | October 11 Task List
(28 KB)
| | | April 16 Task List
(29 KB)
| | | January 16 2008
(28 KB)
| | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
|
|
| H. | CALENDAR REVIEW AND UPDATE |
| H.1 - | Calendar Review 2 minutes | Item Action: None | | | The Board's Calendar will be reviewed and updated during this time. Items may be added to the Calendar with the agreement of four Board Directors as indicated by head nods. To look at district events and to access the District Calendar go to our home page at www.d11.org. On the left hand side of the screen, click on Calendars, then D11 Calendars. In the center of that page, in the drop down box, select District Calendar.
Upcoming meetings/events: - August 13, 2008 (1st regular meeting of the 2008/09 school year)
- August 20, 2008, work session (Branding Campaign)
- August 27, 2008, regular board meeting
- September 10, 2008, regular board meeting
- September 24, 2008, regular board meeting
Ref. Pages: 75-82 | | | | August thru December BOE mtg calendar
(84 KB)
| | | Approval Sheet
( KB)
| | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
|
|
| | | Item Action: None | | | Approval Sheet
( KB)
| | | | Motions | |
Motion
Type
|
Motion
Text
|
Made
By
|
Seconded
By
|
Motion
Result
| | | | | | The Board of Education adjourned at 11:15 p.m.
Julie Rene Stevens, Secretary to the Board of Education
| |
|
|