♫
Downloads
and Viruses
http://www.cbc.ca/streetcents/guide/2003/07/s06_01.html
♫
Music
downloading
-----
If
it’s free, is it for me?
http://www.forwardillinois.com/schools/musicdownloading.aspx
♫
How
do musicians feel about Internet file-sharing?
http://www.duanemorris.com/articles/article1568.html
♫
Local
musicians defend music downloading
http://www.cariboo.bc.ca/news/Stories04Dec7/downld.html
♫
Piracy
pillages music industry
http://www.usatoday.com/money/covers/2002-04-05-music-piracy.htm
Illegal
Free Music: Downloads with Consequences
December 13, 2004
By Jeremy Horwitz, Editor-in-Chief of iPodlounge.com
Six years ago, the sheer quantity of open challenges to American copyright
law created a popular perception that music - old and new alike - was
supposed to be free, and "shared" between friends and strangers
alike. Upon release of just about any new album (and sometimes even
before), full MP3-format tracks appeared on music-sharing services such as
Napster and Kazaa, spreading around the world without restriction. Many
recording artists were angered by what they felt was mass theft of their
music, while others either ignored or embraced the file-sharing.
The Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) decided to fight the
"music is free" movement, undertaking highly publicized lawsuits
on behalf of artists it represented. Services such as Napster were sued
for billions of dollars as facilitators of copyright infringement, and
either driven out of business or forced into retreat. Subsequently, RIAA
lawsuits against individuals shut down large resources of
"shared" music, and warned others that swapping smaller
quantities of copyrighted content could subject them to similar legal
action.
RIAA
lawsuits haven't stopped the trading of copyrighted music online, but
they've turned file-sharing into a game of Russian Roulette. For obvious
reasons, iPodlounge does not recommend the sharing or downloading of
"free" music from file-sharing services unless you know for sure
that the artist has specifically given permission for that music to be
shared.
Non-U.S.
Music Download Sites:
A Dangerous Gray Area
The average person should be aware that there's likely something wrong
about getting entire free albums for nothing, but what if they were
offered for four cents per song, instead of ten or more dollars per album?
If you pay something for your downloads, is that enough to protect
yourself from being sued?
That's the question posed by a few fly-by-night web sites - often operated
by individuals outside of the United States - that purport to offer
penny-per-megabyte downloads of popular music. One of the more notable,
AllofMP3.com, offers a surprisingly robust collection of albums from major
recording artists in the compressed audio format of your choice, More
amazingly, songs are available for download at rates of under 10 cents per
track, and the site has claimed for months - without public legal
challenge, at least - that it is operating legally under Russian law.
Competing site Weblisten.com offers a similar downloading service from
Spain. Other sites offering similarly priced downloads of major recording
artists' products, such as the Spanish site Puretunes.com, have been sued
and shut down.
iPodlounge
doesn't take a position on the legality of any of these specific sites, as
they operate under foreign legal systems and may or may not be entitled to
offer the pricing and unprotected files they are selling. We urge our
readers to exercise caution before assuming that any "purchased"
music from these stores is a replacement for store-purchased CDs or
licensed tracks from established domestic vendors of digital music.
Thank
you to iPod Lounge:
http://www.ipodlounge.com/articles_more.php?id=5754_0_8_0_M