|
Seminar in Advanced Research
Course Number: EN.ADVRE
Overview
Facilitated by the Gifted and Talented teacher, students will participate in
a year-long mentorship that includes the completion of an independent
project. Requirements include: connection with a community mentor,
developing a timeline and learning plan, and evaluation of process and
product using original assessments. The independent project is designed to
enhance and expand the meta-cognitive process of research, development and
presentation as part of the life-long learning process.
Target Audience: gifted resource teachers, science teachers, industrial
technology teachers and mathematics teachers
Prerequisite: recommendation by at least one teacher and student must attend
a summer training
Course Length: 1 Period Length: 1 Grade Level: 9-12 Credit per Semester: .5
(entire year: 1.0)
Additional Credit Information: Credits per Semester: .5 (Elective) |
|
|
|
Enduring Understandings - important ideas that students should carry
with them years beyond the instruction received this year.
-
After a review of available and pertinent
information, scientists formulate a hypothesis. A scientific
investigation uses a repeatable procedure to explore one independent
variable and proper constants or controls.
-
Scientists use evidence gained through
scientific processes to explain the natural world.
-
Recognizing bias and opinion is important
when processing scientific information.
-
Scientists communicate about and critique
each others work.
-
A valid hypothesis or theory must
accommodate new data or the hypothesis or theory must be changed.
-
The interdependent fields of science are
connected through a particular way of knowing.
Essential Questions - most important “big picture” questions students
should be able to answer after completing learning activities.
-
Why is it important to continuously
evaluate and revise scientific explanations and models?
-
What makes a scientific conclusion valid
and reliable? What is the importance of written communication in a
scientific investigation? Why might there be alternative explanations
and models?
-
What is the importance of identifying
alternative explanations and models? How do theories change over time?
How does a scientific hypothesis drive an investigation?
-
What are safe laboratory practices?
-
What constitutes scientific evidence?
What makes data valid and reliable?
-
Why is it important to recognize patterns
and trends in scientific data?
-
How are systems kept in balance?
-
How are models used to increase our
understanding of the natural world?
-
How do hypotheses and theories change
over time?
Standards
Science Standard 1: Students apply the process of scientific
investigation and design, conduct, communicate about, and evaluate such
investigations.
Standard 1 Benchmarks: Grades 9-12
1. select and use appropriate technologies to gather, process, and analyze
data and to report information related to an investigation
2. identify major sources or error or uncertainty within an investigation
(for example: particular measuring devices and experimental procedures)
3. recognize and analyze alternative explanations and models
4. construct and revise scientific explanations and models, using evidence,
logic, and experiments that include identifying and controlling variables
5. communicate and evaluate scientific thinking that leads to particular
conclusions
Science Standard 5: Students understand that the nature of science
involves a particular way of building knowledge and making meaning of the
natural world.
Standard 5 Benchmarks: Grades 9-12
1. the scientific way of knowing uses a critique and consensus process;
e.g., peer review, openness to criticism
2. graphs, equations or other models are used to analyze systems involving
change and constancy; e.g., constructing a closed ecosystem
3. there is a difference between a scientific theory and a scientific
hypothesis
|