The Annual Budget
Development Process
District 11’s budget process
starts and finishes with the voter-elected Board of Education and incorporates
many opportunities for input from parents and community residents.
District 11’s fiscal year
begins on July 1, but the budget process begins approximately eight months in
advance. Various segments of the D-11 community review the budget and
provide input during the budget process. The superintendent has formed
five sounding boards (senior citizen, teacher, parent, principal, and
educational support professional) to get input on District issues, including the
budget process.
In addition to the five
sounding boards, there is a District Advisory and Accountability Committee (DAAC)
budget subcommittee that involves parents, employees and community members in
the budget process. Recent budget process modifications allow even more
input to the allocation of resources. Comments about new funding
prioritization now come earlier from the DAAC budget subcommittee and District
staff input is also received sooner in the budget development process.
By law, the District staff
could prepare the budget and submit it to the Board of Education on May 30 with
just a single public meeting prior to the Board’s vote on June 30. School
District 11’s budget process far exceeds state requirements for involving the
community, providing numerous opportunities for review and input.
Here is an example of a typical
timeline of budget development:
Eight months ahead
(October)
The DAAC Budget Subcommittee
begins work.
Seven months ahead
(November)
Division heads and department
budget managers analyze their budget needs and submit budget requests to
the Budget Office.
Six months ahead
(December)
The Board of Education approves
the projected student count, which is used for budgeting total program funding
from the state. Historically, D-11’s forecasting models provide a 99-plus
percent accuracy against the final document.
Five months ahead
(January)
The Board of Education reviews
the District’s strategic plan and Board goals and objectives – what must be
accomplished in the next year – as the basis for developing the budget.
Four months ahead
(February)
The Board reviews preliminary
budget development assumptions with formal input from the community. These
assumptions fine tune projections of factors that were forecasted months prior –
pupil count projections, school improvement plans, District improvement plans,
the capital plan update and the technology plan update.
Three months ahead
(March)
By now, parents, community
members, employee groups, principals and budget managers have presented
preliminary draft budgets. All of these recommendations are merged to
result in a budget for the next school year.
One month ahead (May)
The Board and the public
receive the preliminary proposed budget and forward it to the DAAC for final
recommendations and review.
End of June
After two more meetings at
which the budget is subject to public scrutiny and Board of Education review,
the board votes to approve the budget for the next school year.
Award-winning budget performance
For twelve straight years,
District 11 has been recognized by the Association of School Business Officials
(ASBO). D-11 was the first school district in Colorado to receive ASBO’s
Meritorious Budget Award.
Impact of the MiLO Funding on the
budget development process
The Mill Levy Override (MiLO),
approved by voters in November 2000, began providing additional property
tax-based operating funds during FY 2000-01. The proceeds are being used
specifically to fund a 24-point spending plan that was part of the MiLO ballot
issue question. Because actual property tax collections fluctuate from
year to year, a phased spending plan was developed using a timeline that
projected when the additional funds would be received by D-11. It is
estimated that it will take eight to twelve years for D-11 to fully realize the
maximum annual funding potential of $26.9 million.
APPLE Performance Plan recommendations and budget
implications
In addition to guaranteeing
adherence to the 24-point MiLO Spending Plan (above) and formation of a
citizens’ oversight committee to oversee MiLO implementation, the November 2000
ballot issue promised that a performance plan would be developed to ensure
accountability.
The Academic Performance Plan
for the Learning Environment (APPLE) was submitted to the Board of Education in
November 2001. D-11 administrators and staff have reviewed and responded
to the recommendations and have submitted their responses to the Board for
review. The more than 40 recommendations contained in the report have been
evaluated and prioritized. The financial and human resources needed to
implement improvement strategies have been assessed and are addressed beginning
in FY 2002-03.
DISTRICT 11 BUDGET DEVELOPMENT PROCESS AND CALENDAR
FY 2008-2009
The District strategic plan and
Board goals will be the basis for the budget development process.
Other influences on the budget
development process include pupil count projections, estimated
property assessed valuations,
estimated beginning fund balance, school improvement plans,
district improvement plans, capital
plan update, and technology plan update.
October, 2007 Chief
Financial Officer discusses the IBR process for FY08/09 proposed
budget with division heads.
October 31, 2007 Summarized
incremental budget requests (IBRs) over $100,000 are due into the Budget Office.
November, 2007 Division heads
review and prioritize IBRs over $100,000.
December 12, 2007
Mill Levy
Certification for property tax collection in calendar year 2008. C.R.S.
39-5-128(1) (Certified no later than December 15)
January
18, 2008
Pupil
projections due.
January 25, 2008 Draft preliminary budget development assumptions due.
February, 2008 Discuss preliminary budget
development assumptions with school board, sounding boards, employee groups, and
District Advisory Accountability Committee (DAAC) Budget Committee.
February 27,
2008
Board non-action on
recommended preliminary budget development assumptions.
March 12,
2008
Board action on preliminary budget development assumptions and DAAC
Budget Committee preliminary report presentation.
March
21, 2008
Department
budget allocation worksheets due to the Budget Office.
Worksheets must have division head approving signature.
April 1, 2008
Per pupil allocation budgets and each school's current fee schedule
due to school principals.
April 11, 2008
Other fund budget worksheets due to the Budget Office.
April 28, 2008
Schools return per pupil allocation budgets and revised fee schedules
to the Budget Office.
May 14,
2008
Board non-action on budget modification procedures.
May 31, 2008
Publish notice to the public that the proposed budget is available for review
per C.R.S. 22-44-109(1).
June 4,
2008
Board work session to discuss proposed budget and possible June
modifications to the proposed budget.
DAACBudget Committee presents their final report.
June 11,
2008 Board
action on budget modification procedures. Board non-action for
adopted budget and the following resolutions: appropriation resolution,
inter-fund borrowing resolution, TABOR reserves resolution, fund balance
designation resolution, student fees, fines and charges resolution, and use of
beginning fund balance resolution. C.R.S. 22-44-110
June 25, 2008
Board action for budget adoption and resolutions. C.R.S. 22-44-110
Revised 03/07/08 |